Blogger Alerts


GasHoax Trailer 

A new short film by Phelim McAleer that debunks another fracking health scare by Josh Fox, director of GASWORK.


Obama Record in a Nut Shell 

The Obama Record in a Nut Shell 



Classic Socialist Leadership

God Help the United States of America


Sen Shaheen Receives Pro-Iran Lobby Money, Then Supports Iran Deal

Stunning news to report to you this evening, as reports surface that lobbyists aligned with the Iranian regime have been funneling money to Democrats in Congress who are now coming out and announcing their support for the disastrous Iranian Nuclear Deal. 


The Democrats who took money from the Iranian-aligned lobbyists include: Sen. Edward "Ed" Markey [D-MA],  Sen. Alan "Al" Franken [D-MN],  Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH),  Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY),  Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA),  Rep. Michael "Mike" Honda [D-CA17],  Rep. André Carson [D-IN7],  Rep. Gerald Connolly (D-VA),  Rep. Donna Edwards (D-MD),  Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA).


Carly For America - Read the Pro-Carly Op-Ed The New York Times Didn't Want You to See

I’m sure many of you have heard how the main stream media and the political establishment are trying everything they can to keep Carly Fiorinaoff the main debate stage next month.  The criteria set forth by CNN and approved by the RNC weighs polls taken prior to the Fox News debate more heavily than those taken after, negating much of the momentum Carly has gained since her outstanding performance.  Carly is still working hard on the campaign trail, but the political elite and their allies in the press are certainly making it harder. 


Now we can add The New York Times to the list of main stream media outlets that are working hard against Carly.  After publishing a misleading column that quotes a man who has compared Carly to a murderer and to ISIS, The New York Times refused to publish a rebuttal op-ed written by a former HP Board Member regarding his first-hand account of Carly's transformative leadership. Since the New York Times would not provide equal opportunity to Mr. Perkins to defend Carly's record, we decided to purchase space in the Times to make sure that his voice was heard in the same medium in which Carly was so dishonestly criticized.  


We will not let the main stream media and the political establishment silence the voices of Carly’s supporters!  Will you help us? 


The Truth About Carly 


By Tom Perkins, Former HP Board Member



August 27, 2015 


The consensus is clear: Carly Fiorina won the first Republican Primary debate. As a result she is climbing the polls and into the top tier of candidates. Her rise has led pundits to speculate about her tenure as CEO of Hewlett-Packard. 


I was a member of the HP Board of Directors much of the time Carly was the CEO. I was in the room for many of the decisions she made. I can attest to the strength of Carly’s leadership, the accuracy of her vision and the quality of her management. 


Carly was an excellent CEO. She led HP through one of the worst economic times in decades. Less than two years into Carly’s leadership, the dot com bubble went bust. Silicon Valley was in chaos. Companies were shedding jobs almost daily. There were so many layoffs The Associated Press ran weekly announcements regarding layoffs at tech companies. And The San Francisco Chronicle declared 2001 “The Year of the Layoff.” 


While other Silicon Valley icons like Sun Microsystems disappeared, Carly’s vision and execution not only helped to save HP but made it a strong, more versatile company that could compete in the changing technology sector. 


I was on the Compaq Board during the HP-Compaq merger and remained a member of the new HP Board once the merger was complete. Both companies knew that we needed something dramatic to inject life back into our companies. The merger, while controversial, was unanimously approved by every member of the HP Board and won approval from shareholders. Thanks to Carly’s leadership there was a path forward for this storied but troubled company. 


Critics questioned the move, but history proves Carly was right. Post merger, HP became the biggest computer company in the world. It positioned HP to compete in integrated systems and allowed us to compete in sectors beyond the core strength of the company, printers. 


Carly was hired at HP because it was struggling. Revenues were down, quarterly earnings were missed, innovation lagged and growth stagnated. HP, once the leader in Silicon Valley, was clinging to the status quo and failing to embrace the new tech era. Silicon Valley companies were prospering by taking advantage of the new technologies; HP was stubbornly clinging to the past. HP needed a change agent and someone who could return the company to its glory days. Carly was the right choice. 


The results of Carly’s transformational leadership? HP revenues doubled to more than $80 billion, innovation tripled to 15 patents per day, the growth rate more than quadrupled 6.5 percent and we grew to become the 11th largest company in the country. Carly did what she was brought in to do: turn the company around make it successful again. Not only did she save the company from the dire straits it was in, she laid the foundation for HP’s future growth. 


Critics often claim was fired at HP because she was unsuccessful. As a member of the board, I can tell you this is not true. In truth, it was the Board I was a part of that was ineffective and dysfunctional. The HP board of directors included family members of the founders. Carly worked with the hand she was dealt as best as one could. While Carly fought to save the company and the employees within, some board members fought for their own power or advancement. You see, some board members wanted to micro-manage the company, hand picking friends and allies to run divisions. This is no way to run a global company and Carly had the strength of character and courage of conviction to stand up to it and ultimately she lost her job because of it. 


While lesser leaders would have accepted offers of transition plans and graceful resignations, Carly would have none of that. Carly demanded to be fired. In order to restore peace to the board I voted to fire her. That was a mistake. 


In the months and years after Carly left, the Board of Directors remained dysfunctional. The Board members who plotted Carly’s ouster eventually resigned after an embarrassing investigation by Congress. 


I have no question that Carly is a transformational leader who uniquely has both vision and the expertise to implement it. We are in the middle of a heated election, and often facts and the truth get lost in the heat of partisan rhetoric. As someone who worked with and observed Carly first hand I can attest to her abilities, intellect and talent. I am proud to support Carly Fiorina for President of the United States. 


Tom Perkins is the founder of the California venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. 
























CEI - EPA's Clean Power Plan Overreach 

The “Clean Power” Plan final rule is due in August and the word is that it will be released next Tuesday, August 4.

In advance of that final rule, CEI released a new paper today “EPA’s Clean Power Plan Overreach,” by William Yeatman.

In the Clean Power Plan proposal, the EPA took the unusual step of preemptively seeking Chevron deference from federal courts, even though the Clean Power Plan will not undergo judicial review until after the final rule is published in the Federal Register. Chevron deference is a famous and oft-employed administrative law principle that federal courts should defer to reasonable agency construction of the statutes they are charged with administering, in reference to a seminal 1984 Supreme Court ruling, Chevron USA Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. As this analysis demonstrates, the agency’s request for judicial deference lacks merit.

The paper’s four sections break down the EPA’s overreach considering Chevron deference:

  • The first section of this paper explains the legal reasoning behind Chevron deference, as well as subsequent refinements of the doctrine in Article III courts.
  • The second section discusses the Clean Power Plan’s unprecedented scope and the EPA’s capacious interpretation of Clean Air Act Section 111(d), which allegedly authorizes the rule.
  • The third section argues that the Clean Power Plan contravenes every direct and indirect foundation for Chevron deference.
  • The last section briefly investigates how federal courts are likely to review the Clean Power Plan, without resorting to the Chevron framework, and concludes that the EPA’s interpretation is unlikely to survive such a “fair” reading.

Read the paper here and feel free to share the link on Facebook and Twitter.

The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group in Washington, D.C. CEI promotes the institutions of liberty and works to remove government-created barriers to economic freedom, innovation, and prosperity through timely analysis, effective advocacy, inclusive coalition-building, and strategic litigation.