NH INSIDER

Looks like a little, or should I say liberal, house cleaning is going on regarding prosecuting foreign terrorists in civilian court.

Remember back in 1999 when Ahmed Ressam, the “Millenium Bomber” tried to blow up LAX? Ahmed cooperated with authorities and was handed a 22 year prison sentence. This was before 9/11 and there was no "real war" against the US by terrorists, just constant attacks and killings of Americans.

Ahmed Ressam was tried in civilian court because we did not have the required laws to allow military prosecution like we do now.

Surprise, in February 2, 2010 Ressam’s ridiculously light sentence was thrown out by a federal appeals court, the Ninth Court, of all courts, in San Francisco. It seems Ahmed backed out of his cushy deal and stopped cooperating. Oh well.

What a coincidence though!

Just as President Barry Soetoro’s team of former President Bush stalkers in the AG’s Office began the process of Mirandising international terrorists for prosecution in civil court where, hopefully, enough evidence can be gathered to begin prosecution of the evil Cheney/Bush Administration, a liberal court in San Francisco gets tough on a terrorist.

This light sentence, civil court gift to Ahmed, wasn’t as nice as the wrist slap delivered to one ugly mama, Lynne F. Stewart, the America-hating, Soros-funded lawyer for the first batch of New York City bombers led by the “blind cleric’ Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman.

Lynne F. Stewart was facing a 40 years sentence for using a cadre of sleeper cell terrorists in the US to send messages to the blind clerics pals back in Egypt, one of which was – you guessed it, Bin Laden. This female Michael Moore look alike used her position as the terrorist’s US civil court lawyer to help him continue terrorizing in other parts of the world while his trial was ongoing in New York. Over a thousand lawyers, law professors, and notibles of the elite world of American moonbats wrote letters in support of this beast, Stewart. They are still out there practicing their various liberal/progressive trades.

Yep, civil trials for terrorist, what could go wrong?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/us/03bomber.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/17/nyregion/17stewart.html?_r=1

Here is part of an email I was sent from a resident from a small town that has a SB#2 Town Meeting. The SB#2, or RSA 40:13, Town Meeting consists of a “deliberative session” before the actual Town Meeting where everyone has an opportunity to vote – BY SECRET BALLOT.

There has been an unconstitutional trick pulled on voters at SB#2 towns and schools which leaves the choices of the ballot voting taxpayers limited and which also strips petitioners of any chance certain petitioned warrant articles will come before voters through secret ballots.

Here is what happened in this small town:

THE PETITION WAS:

"ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF COMBINING THE POSITION OF TAX COLLECTOR AND TOWN CLERK THEREBY CREATING ANEW OFFICE OF TOWN CLERK-TAX COLLECTOR TO BE HELD BY ONE INDIVIDUAL FOR A

3 YEAR TERM AT A SALERY OF $40,000?

THEY AMENDED IT TO SAY:

"ARE YOU IN FAVOR"?      ELIMINATING ALL THE WORDS AFTER THAT.

NOTHING ELSE.

THERE WILL AN ARTICLE THAT ONLY SAYS  - "ARE YOU IN FAVOR" !

So a small group of people at the deliberative session stripped all the relevant language from a warrant article brought by citizen’s petition. There will be absolutely no chance anyone voting by ballot will vote for a combined Town Clerk, Tax Collector position.

A superior court in NH has affirmed this unconstitutional practice as being the same as zero-funding a warrant article.

Nothing could be farther from the truth.

Historically, voters at a traditional town meeting would replace a dollar figure on a warrant article with zero to in effect kill it – but everyone at least knew what was being zero-funded.

To take a citizens petition and deny ballot voters the opportunity, and petitioners the right, to have on the ballot the wording on a citizens petition is an abomination.

I understand completely how tax and spenders consider it an abomination to have too many people in town decide what is best for everyone else. It is in their nature.

I also understand how NH Superior Courts work as well. They have a habit of stepping on taxpayers rights.

But taxpayers still have a tool left to them until we can end this practice – vote NO on everything. Become an informed NO voter.

If there is a new fire truck or cruiser on the ballot let the fire chief and police chief know why you will be voting NO on their warrant articles, teachers raises – same thing.

Once the clique at your deliberative session gets a phone call from the local powers-that-be that their nasty habit of gutting petitioned warrant articles cost everyone - it will stop.

President Barry Soetoro showed up at a State of the Union Speech and delivered a 2012 campaign salvo showing and unmatched lack of understanding of the position he is in.

I am glad I have only suffered short re-runs clips from last night’s grandstanding. I didn't watch.

Ax Men was on.

Shea-Porker has made some news! She is on Drudge this morning involved in a gender equality workshop she delivered at some location, mostly made of women I suppose.

And what does this mean?

Its time to trot out the Shea-Porker Defense League, or as it is also known – moonbats defending moonbats.

There is probably a good reason Carol Shea-Porker has stepped in it again. I can think of a few:

1. She ain’t too flippin bright.

2. Someone had to hold the seat that should have gone to Gary Dodds.

3. Carol wants bloggers to keep busy deconstructing moonbat psycho-babble.

4. Representative Shea-Porker needed to bring some sanity to the health care debate

5. It’s a woman’s right to choose to look like a fool.

This morning I called Barbara Anderson from Citizens for Limited Taxation, CNHT’s counterpart in Massachusetts, to congratulate her and CLT on Scott Brown’s election. I know CLT has worked with Senator Brown and they were whole heartedly supporting him. Here is part of a statement and his rating by CLT. For more on Senator Brown check out the CLT web site at: cltg.org

Over the years, Scott Brown has filed legislation for Citizens for Limited Taxation on tax cuts and tax limitation. For anyone who asks you, his Citizens for Limited Taxation Legislative Ratings through his eleven years in the Massachusetts House and Senate are as follows:

 Barbara says they have some more good candidates in Massachusetts(e)* waiting in the wings.

And by the way, 25% is what most Democrats get for a CLT rating.

* The Coakley spelling of Massachusetts ends in e just like potatoe.