Advertising

 

 


 

 

« Like Impeachement Is Groovy | Main | Blame The Taxpayer Group Not The Professionals »
Monday
Apr142008

Stupid Is As Epping Does

Epping resident Tom Sutliff’s Attorney, Chuck Douglass, sent me the 41 page Federal Court ruling on Compeled Speech violations in Tom’s Town of Epping.

I’ll boil it down - Tom and his group, EPRG, win!

Tom did not get everything he wanted from the case but I would call having the Federal Court rule that the Epping selectmen violated Tom Sutliff’s constitutional rights by denying him the ability to link his taxpayer activist site to the town’s website without first handing over to the Select Board a detailed financial report and membership list of his group – something the tax and spend groupies did not have to do to link to the town site a big step forward.

For some unknown reason, the Federal Court got mired down in a recent Supreme Court ruling about a meat producers association and some federal bureaucracy about compelled speech, which has NOTHING to do with local legislative bodies, taxpayers, and municipal government. I guess having the same title on your case must mean something – who knows. In any case a part of the action Tom Sutliff brought will have to wait for another NH violation to take action on.

So go ahead Epping, keep on sending out taxpayer funded opinion pieces selling your tax and spend political positions to the voters without offering equal space to taxpayers like EPRG or anyone else. And show everyone who is boss by trying to pry a membership list and financial statement out of a private taxpayer group in exchange for linking to your taxpayer funded web site. Smart move.

All these shenanigans will make great reading in the court depositions you will have to sit through later on.

Reader Comments (4)

Ed,

I really surprised at this from Epping given at least one of the Select 'persons' is normally quite strong behind tax payer rights.
April 16, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterdave
Dave:

OUT VOTED.
April 16, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterEd Naile
You certainly do find the silver lining. The court, properly, tossed the original complaint as essentialy frivolous and certainly without merit. The web issue, not being part of the original complaint, has not been ruled on yet - which is not quite the same as a "win" last time I checked.

April 17, 2008 | Unregistered Commenter2true
2true:

If it is without merit then PLEASE tell your friends in Epping to keep selling their views with town and school produced mailings.

And by all means refuse to post the EPRG web site on the town site.

That would be your silver lining.

April 20, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterEd Naile

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.