Family First

Raising well adjusted children is the first thing on every social experimenter’s list.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2255241/Sperm-donor-ordered-pay-child-support-lesbian-couple-despite-giving-rights-child.html

The Craig’s List sperm donor, according to the State of Kansas, has to pay child support to a “lesbian” couple who wanted to have a baby but split a year, maybe less, later.

The sperm donor was male. That seems to be a solid start.

The mothers wanted a baby but split up and one is now with a male. So one I assume one of the lesbians is bisexual, not a lesbian.

No problem for the one year old, she is surrounded by stable individuals who were out to prove a political point or two.

Maybe everyone can now join some new agenda-based life style like global warming protesting, or Occupy Kansas.

But my guess is they will soon start fighting over who raises the product they went to Craig’s List for.

Enjoy the family photos.

Comments

[Rick Barnes]

Guys always end up getting it in the end. Women can "choose" to just kill the baby if they don't want it. If they actually have any cares about human life they have other options like adoption as well. But guys... they get to pay out one way or another even if they don't want the baby.

Something similar happened to a friend of mine. Years before I knew him, he had gotten a woman pregnant. They were breaking up at the time so she didn't even tell him about it. She went off with another guy and had the baby in secret. 8 years later she lost her job and had to apply for unemployment. The state, being the nice helpful group government is, asked her why she wasn't getting child support. She said she didn't want the father to know about the child and never told him about it. They required her to not only sue him for child support but sue him for the 8 years back support he should have been paying the whole time. They did the paternity test and proved it was his and he instantly became a father and had to pay up.
Of course having to pay out 8 years back support for a child he didn't even know about didn't help his current family since it drove him into near bankruptcy.

[Ed Naile]

Theft by deception, simple as that.

[dave]

I know this is not PC, but actions have consequences and the guy whose actions caught up with him deserved his consequences. We are seeing this reality today with the pot head we elected to be president because many of our friends saw no consequences to their actions in the voting booth.

[C. dog]

Not true, Dave. Where's the contract terms – and conditions appertaining thereto – spelling out his paternal obligations for a night of rolling in the hay? This story merely proves the biased application of the legal sleaze system ... anything for the girly votes.
– C. dog sipping lattés risk free

[Ed Naile]

It is always fun to experiment with the American, traditional family - if you are a liberal progressive and never bound by or sorry for your mistakes.

Makes for a well rounded child as well - they spin like a top looking for stability.

Sad, angry people they are.

[dave]

We know majority of murderers like Sandy Hook are while males who had no or poor relationship with fathers. Why do we want to start life without a father on purpose?