From The Mouth Of Knaves
Currently, in the review of who voted in Dover, NH from other states I was going through the usual places you find people who harbor out of state voters and I came upon this juicy tid bit from the Democrat web page in that city.
They had a very important guest speaker recently and what she says about the Free State Project speaks volumes.
Caitlin Rollo at the April DDC Meeting
Caitlin Rollo from Rollinsford was our special guest speaker at the April meeting of the Dover Democrats. Caitlin is the Research and Political Director Granite State Progress, a progressive advocacy group based in Concord, NH. She is knowledgeable about the Free State Project (FSP) and has done extensive research on them. Caitlin explained that the objective of the FSP, beginning 10 years ago, was to convince 20,000 (they are short of that goal) people to move to NH to change and reduce state government, protect life, liberty, and property.
They provide members assistance with jobs and housing, festivals such as Porkfest, state house tours and gov. training on how to run for office.
Caitlin emphasized the importance to Democrats and other progressives of understanding the FSP; we must know who are members and supporters and how Free Staters' goals differ widely from progressive goals.
This is ironic in so many ways.
Here I am tracking out of state voter scum and the Democrat Committee in Dover is being told they should track Free Staters because their goals are more, can we say this, American, than the Dover Democrats can stand.
Let’s review the goals of the Free State Movement as described by a Free State tracker:
1. “move to NH to change and reduce state government, protect life, liberty, and property.”
2. “They provide members assistance with jobs and housing, festivals such as Porkfest, state house tours and gov. training on how to run for office.”
Since, as Caitlin the Free State tracker says, these goals differ wildly from “progressive goals” which by the way are not always Democrat goals. They are as she says “progressive goals” as in, socialist, Marxists, communist - left wing nut bag goals.
Caitlin lays out exactly what many Democrats should be aware of. The people who run the Democrat Party in most places in America do not share typical, traditional, historic, workable, sensible American goals. They share progressive goals Caitlin can not say out loud at a meeting even in Dover.
By the way, when I am tracking low-life vote thieves who come from other states to steal NH votes I always double check any “Caitlins” I come across no matter how many different ways they spell this wildly popular in 1992 name.
See: Caitlin Ann Legacki, Democrat low-life vote thief who worked for Jeanne Shaheen in NH in 2008.