Starting in October a small liberal paper in Milford began questioning The Coalition of New Hampshire’s articles about interstate vote thief Jared Steven Cram, a lawyer who lives in Philadelphia Pa. and who votes in both states to maximize his vote value. That is something real NH voters can not do legally.
See RSA 659:34-a.
The Milford Cabinet, without contacting a single source we know of, proceeded on its editorial page, to call us out for writing falsehoods about their protected vote thief, Jared Steven Cram. They did this for three editions.
Well, CNHT sent the paper, through its comments section, a simple pathway to all the evidence they needed to prove us wrong – Jared Steven Cram’s Pa. and NH voting records. But the paper has yet to offer a retraction or apology to CNHT or explain how we are wrong.
We have a lot of other information about Jared Steven Cram we will be printing in the near future. Maybe they are wise to keep their smarmy editorials to themselves, but I think not.
Most progressives are so sure they are a superior breed compared to others that they simply refuse to believe they could possibly be wrong about something or that the lower classes do not deserve a simple response.
But why has Jared Steve Cram not responded to what the Milford Cabinet says are false accusations made by CNHT? He is a member of MENSA so he is certainly smart enough to defend himself. Cram is also an attorney.
Could Jared Steven Cram know something about his interstate double voting in a Federal election the Milford paper doesn’t?
Google this and find out: 42 U.S. Code § 1973gg–10 - Criminal penalties.
But that is not all that is in store for Attorney Jared Steven Cram.
And we are not quite finished with the Milford paper either.