A Note From Our Friends At National Taxpayer's Union

Subject: The Spending Proposed by New Hampshire's Congressional Delegation

to:

Coalition of New Hampshire Taxpayers

Not sure if this was the best email address to use, but it was all I was able to find on your website.

I thought you might be interested in the latest BillTally findings on New Hampshire’s delegation from our analysis of the 112th Congress. The report provides a comprehensive overview of the net cost of all of the spending and savings bills sponsored or cosponsored by each Member of Congress. We cross-index our database of cost estimates with each bill supported by each Member to calculate their net spending agenda (excluding overlapping/duplicate measures).

Name	Party	Increases	Decreases	Net Spending Agenda	# of Increases	# of Decreases
Ayotte, Kelly	R	$8,196	($234,655)	($226,459)	15	25
Shaheen, Jeanne	D	$31,992	($647)	$31,345	48	6
Bass, Charles	R	$3,121	($34,656)	($31,535)	13	8
Guinta, Frank	R	$2,909	($355,636)	($352,727)	14	17
Notes: The links in the names will open a detailed report of that Member’s sponsored bills that had cost estimates. Dollar figures are in millions.

Among the states and territories, New Hampshire’s House delegation proposed, on net, to cut federal spending by an average of $192 billion. That was higher than all but 3 other House delegations in the country. Focusing exclusively on Republican delegations in the House, New Hampshire’s two Representatives proposed the 13^th largest budget-reducing agendas. Both of New Hampshire’s House Representatives were “net cutters,” meaning that the legislation they sponsored would, on net, decrease federal spending if passed.

Congressman Frank Guinta’s net budget-cutting agenda of nearly $353 billion ranked as the 23^rdhighest out of all U.S. Representatives, and the 35^th highest out of the entire 112^th Congress.New Hampshire’s Senate contingency proposed a net average cut agenda of just less than $98 billion, almost exactly matching the Senate-wide average. Senator Jeanne Shaheen’s $31 billion in proposed spending increases was less than the $39 billion agenda supported by the average Senate Democrat. Her Republican colleague, Senator Kelly Ayotte, proposed just over $226 billion in budget cuts, which was less than the average Senate Republican agenda of $273 billion in cuts.

The full report contains lots of other data points, including the cost of all bills introduced in each Chamber and a look at fiscally-related member caucuses such as the Tea Party Caucus.

http://www.ntu.org/ntuf/52813_112th-congress-billtally-spending-report.html 

http://www.ntu.org/on-capitol-hill/billtally/ 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

Demian Brady
Director of Research
National Taxpayers Union Foundation

New Campaign Dynamics

I just spent about 13 hours driving back to NH from Tennessee and I had a thought about all this data base talk.

Hillary Clinton, when she was co-president, had her servant, Craig Livingstone, steal 900 FBI files. Remember that? The number dribbed and drabbed out in the press until we had the number of stolen FBI files on her enemies list totaling about 900.

And she is endeared to most Democrats as presidential material.

So it shouldn’t shock anyone with a small amount of grey matter that Obama, his academic communists, and Chicago thugs are topping Hillary’s number of stolen FBI files by millions of tracked phone calls and e-mails of private citizens.

The 2012 Democrat machine was propelled by swarms of data miners nationally and also here in NH because Obama and Biden (remember him?) needed the electoral votes of NH and Ohio. Ohio TEA Partiers suffered the IRS scam as well so Democrats could lessen the TEA Party numbers in that important state.

And the result of all that data mining is – we have another four years of people running the Executive Branch who can run crooked campaigns but not govern a country.

That got me thinking.

Why not have a grass-roots data mining endeavor on the right?

What if everyone who sees an Obama Biden (remember him?) bumper sticker on a car, wrote down that vehicle’s license plate number and state of registration and sent it to me so I could start a moonbat database?

Anyone bold enough, or stupid enough, to put a socialist sticker on their Prius could not possibly mind being on my National Data-base of Moonbats.

Of course I will need to start a 501(c)3 non-profit to help pay for my efforts to track lefties and keep my data-base updated.

I think choosing a non-controversial name for my non-profit to get a green light from the IRS is in order.

Example:

Sandals with Socks.org

I Love Barack’s Middle Name.org

Friends of Saul Alynski.666

Is it 1984 yet.commie

What About Plan C?

Plan A: Get pregnant, ASAP

Plan B: Give this Plan B stuff to girls as young as 15 (for now) without a parent involved.

Plan C (My plan): Give Plan B to boys of any age to carry around in case of "emergencies."

What the heck, why not go all in?

If you are a "compassionate progressive" how can you deny males the same rights as females?

"It takes a village" to hand out Plan B in a progressive family values village.

Heads Up

I have been on the road off and on since March this year with Stihl Timbersports.

Today from noon to 3:30 we will finish up here in Pigeon Forge Tn.

You can watch live here:

http://www.stihlusa.com/stihl-timbersports/stihl-timbersports-community/watch-live/

NSA Spying?

No, the NSA wasn't spying on individuals through their VERIZON phones for catching terrorists.

Here is my best guess:

The Obama campaign was using the NSA to help their re-election campaign.

The timing is just when Organizing for America really started kicking in its data mining operation.

That is how it went in New Hampshire. Obama campaign people came in two eight months to a year out and the last crowd showed up two months out from the November election.

Wait and see.