Ed Naile, CNHT

Hear Ed Naile every Wednesday morning on WLMW 90.7 FM on the Girard at Large radio show or listen to the archives at Voter Fraud Radio
Tuesday
Nov182014

Those Who Remember Nothing

In the race for Republican Speaker of the House all kinds of people are putting forth their opinions – even Connecticut’s, Fergus Cullen, is back for a swat at the NH Conservatives, as usual.

But the short story regarding the choice is simple.

Just ask Democrat Party Chair, Ray Buckley, who he wants for the Republican Speaker.

That should settle it.

Buckley, with his standard tactics, has failed to keep one candidate out of the House and Republican Leadership. Now he is hoping that the endless smear campaign has frightened enough Republicans that they will help do the job for him – so we can all get along.

Buckley’s slash and burn campaign style has just delivered another huge loss to Democrats in 2014. So will Republicans serve him up at least a partial win and let his tactics control who Republicans pick for Speaker?

Eyes focused completely on navel, Republicans once again stumble towards a trap.

 

Saturday
Nov152014

I'm Sorry They Don't Have A Clue

The Milford Cabinet, a  very small ,liberal paper, has done a second story defending interstate voter Jared Steven Cram, a lawyer from Philadelphia who voted in that state, 11 times since 2005 when he first registered there, and twice in the same year, at least, in Wilton, New Hampshire.

Jared Steven Cram is trying to take advantage of the non-enforcement of NH’s election laws by the NH Attorney General’s Office and their interesting take on what it means to be an “otherwise qualified voter” in NH, or any other state for that matter. The AG’s Office put out some sort of directive to election officials right before this last election stating that under no circumstances was anyone to be turned away from voting on November 4, 2012. My, how we forget to look at the NH and Federal laws regarding “qualified voters” when we work in the NH AG’s Office.

Back to the Milford Cabinet article suggesting I apologize to their double voter from Pennsylvania.

Here it is: http://www.cabinet.com/cabinet/cabineteditorials/1051338-308/fraud-accusation-tarnishes-image.html

Now if I had falsely accused this low-life of voting in two states for the same candidates don’t you think someone at the NH Secretary of State’s Office would be quoted?

How about the NH AG, he must be interested in me trying to intimidate an out-of-state voter?

Maybe Jared, being a lawyer, a member of MENSA, and an honest double voter, could sue me for slander, libel, voter intimidation, anything. I am waiting.

How about that liberal paper offering a single statute proving non-residents can vote in NH and in another state and still be “qualified voters” of this state? That NH law must be quite interesting, seeing that the home state of people like low-life vote thief Jared Steven Cram has its own statutes regarding residency and voting. I think in the Commonwealth you are called a “resident elector” or some such thing we can all find out if Jared sues me.

Did the Milford Cabinet check any of this out?

Or are they trying to place all this on the shoulders of the poor Town Clerk. She is directed by the voter fraud enablers in Concord. It isn’t her fault NH lets non-residents steal NH votes.

Maybe I shouldn’t call it stealing. That is a pretty harsh term. Let’s use the language in Federal Statute.

42 U.S. Code § 1973gg–10 - Criminal penalties

A person, including an election official, who in any election for Federal office

 (1) knowingly and willfully intimidates, threatens, or coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any person for—

 (A) registering to vote, or voting, or attempting to register or vote;

 (B) urging or aiding any person to register to vote, to vote, or to attempt to register or vote; or

 (C) exercising any right under this subchapter; or

 (2) knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process, by—

  (A) the procurement or submission of voter registration applications that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held; or

 (B) the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held, shall be fined in accordance with title 18 (which fines shall be paid into the general fund of the Treasury, miscellaneous receipts (pursuant to section 3302 of title 31), notwithstanding any other law), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

 That’s more like it.

Monday
Nov102014

Bill O'Brien For Speaker

I know they won’t listen to me but if only Charlie Brown was here to tell the Establishment Republicans not to try and kick the ball the Democrats are holding for them. But there is no talking sense to people who are scared of their own shadow and principals.

Here we go.

Bill O’Brien is your only logical pick for Speaker of the House for several self evident reasons.

1. Bill O’Brien is the only former House Speaker with the history of eliminating an $800 million dollar deficit the Democrats set up for a broad based tax. That should be enough.

2. Speaker Bill O’Brien was isolated and targeted with the age old Alinsky Rules for Radicals, and that is what the Democrat leadership is, playbook. Bill O’Brien and Bill O’Brien alone was targeted because he was effective. Here is rule #12:

* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

3. If the Republicans offer themselves as prey to the biggest, most effective tool Leftist Democrats have it is only a matter of time until another effective person is singled out for destruction; Gov. Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, Tom Delay, Sen. John Tower, Clarence Thomas, Governor Benson, and on and on. You never win surrendering your most effective people to a dirt bag trick.

4. Establishment Republicans didn’t win this election. There should be no reward, such as the usual throwing one of their own to the wolves.

Now pay attention.

5. And what exactly do Republicans get in exchange for tossing Bill O’Brien into the most recent Democrat constructed gulag? Are they trading for a target they want out? No, they never do. Why not go after Ray Buckley for a “clean 2015 slate”? Aren’t the Dems tired of the roller coaster election triumphs? How about claiming some effective Democrat leader’s head in exchange for Bill O’Brien if you don’t want to pick the obvious stain on decency in charge of the Democrat Party?

How about some offence for a change, Republicans? Is that too much to ask?

6. The NH Democrats ran on a campaign of really stupid issues: war on women, Republicans will abolish S.S, increasing the minimum wage, Scott Brown wasn’t from here, just born here, and most importantly, how much we hate Bill O’Brien. This tactic garnered them the college student top of the ticket vote – as usual. So what’s the first move out of the Republican box? Oh, let’s sacrifice Bill O’Brien and make one of their phony issues a winner.

7. Stop for a minute and try and guess what effective Republican is next in the Alinsky lineup. This tactic works so well it shouldn’t be long before the leftists have a new target to personalize and destroy. What individual has to suffer this time for no reason? Instead of chiming in and agreeing with your opponent that the next person has to go how about defending the target for once? If you do the logical thing and push back against Alinsky’s disgusting Rule #12 the Democrats will become unhinged, to use an old Democrat term for NH conservatives, and wouldn’t that alone be worth it? There is no remedy in the Alinsky playbook for when one of his tools doesn’t work. How about going there for a CHANGE.

 

Sunday
Nov092014

Who's More Like New Hampshire?

From The Mouth Of Knaves

Currently, in the review of who voted in Dover, NH from other states I was going through the usual places you find people who harbor out of state voters and I came upon this juicy tid bit from the Democrat web page in that city.

They had a very important guest speaker recently and what she says about the Free State Project speaks volumes.

Enjoy!

Caitlin Rollo at the April DDC Meeting

Caitlin Rollo from Rollinsford was our special guest speaker at the April meeting of the Dover Democrats. Caitlin is the Research and Political Director Granite State Progress, a progressive advocacy group based in Concord, NH. She is knowledgeable about the Free State Project (FSP) and has done extensive research on them. Caitlin explained that the objective of the FSP, beginning 10 years ago, was to convince 20,000 (they are short of that goal) people to move to NH to change and reduce state government, protect life, liberty, and property.

They provide members assistance with jobs and housing, festivals such as Porkfest, state house tours and gov. training on how to run for office.

Caitlin emphasized the importance to Democrats and other progressives of understanding the FSP; we must know who are members and supporters and how Free Staters' goals differ widely from progressive goals.

This is ironic in so many ways.

Here I am tracking out of state voter scum and the Democrat Committee in Dover is being told they should track Free Staters because their goals are more, can we say this, American, than the Dover Democrats can stand.

Let’s review the goals of the Free State Movement as described by a Free State tracker:

1. “move to NH to change and reduce state government, protect life, liberty, and property.”

2. “They provide members assistance with jobs and housing, festivals such as Porkfest, state house tours and gov. training on how to run for office.”

Since, as Caitlin the Free State tracker says, these goals differ wildly from “progressive goals” which by the way are not always Democrat goals. They are as she says “progressive goals” as in, socialist, Marxists, communist - left wing nut bag goals.

Caitlin lays out exactly what many Democrats should be aware of. The people who run the Democrat Party in most places in America do not share typical, traditional, historic, workable, sensible American goals. They share progressive goals Caitlin can not say out loud at a meeting even in Dover.

By the way, when I am tracking low-life vote thieves who come from other states to steal NH votes I always double check any “Caitlins” I come across no matter how many different ways they spell this wildly popular in 1992 name.

See: Caitlin Ann Legacki, Democrat low-life vote thief who worked for Jeanne Shaheen in NH in 2008.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saturday
Nov082014

Judicial Watch's Watchers Were Watching

Judicial watch was in NH on Election Day and they pretty much saw what the State does to ensure Democrats win elections in an otherwise Red State.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/11/04/Judicial-Watch-Election-Integrity-Concerns-About-Same-Day-Registration-Voting-In-New-Hampshire

(Sorry for the link to Breitbart, which usually shuts down my computer.)

The “loophole” of letting anyone, well not just anyone, but thousands, cast an irretrievable without any form of ID doesn’t really pass the smell test – unless you need fraud to win.

Here is the loophole:

The SoS and NH AG don’t investigate or prosecute voter fraud and any document that might help a citizen prove voter fraud is either non-public (secret) or altered, or claimed to be a mistake by the powers that be.

And NH has activist judges who invent new categories of voters like this:

A student in NH paying out of state tuition, holding an out of state driver’s license, having a legal domicile I another state, and registered to vote in another state, can claim NH just for the purpose of voting – Democrat.

That is a recent ruling by a shopped-for Superior Court Judge who was shipped in from – the NH AG’s Office.

So in an effort to explain this new concept, I offer this loophole:

You can have a “Jury Duty Domicile” in another state because there is no law against it in NH.

I am going to use my parent’s retirement community address in Pennsylvania for “Jury Duty Purposes” only from now on. This is akin to Philadelphia lawyer Jared Steven Cram using his parent’s house in Wilton to vote (Well, they moved but he is still on the Wilton checklist,) election after election.

There is a loophole for ya!

I can’t vote in Pa. because Pa. has loophole-less laws against that or there might be at least ONE non-Obama vote is some Philadelphia Black Panther Wards – but I should be able to at least be on the Philadelphia jury duty list instead of Hillsborough County, NH.

Here is how the “Jury Duty Domicile” works:

When you get called, just show your out of state driver’s license. Jared Steven Cram uses a Pa. license to vote in NH – I use a NH license to get out of jury duty in Pa.

Now that makes sense – to the NH AG and Secretary of State.