Ed Naile, CNHT

Hear Ed Naile every Wednesday morning on WLMW 90.7 FM on the Girard at Large radio show or listen to the archives at Voter Fraud Radio
Thursday
Aug282014

Taking It Like Men?

Is it nice to see someone get the same nasty treatment they love to dish out to others?

Of course it is!

Consider the dilemma NBC Superstar Tom Brokaw finds himself in with this Page Six investigative journalism news flash:

http://pagesix.com/2014/08/26/tom-brokaw-execs-fuming-over-nbc-chiefs-remark/

NBC has hired a British news hottie, that is how she is described and photographed in several stories I have seen, (and they make fun of FOX News) to clean up the NBC mess that has come from being so left for so long.

You have to admire the side by side photos in this news article. Brokaw is flashing his crooked lower teeth and the British hottie has a sly, smirking pose.

The boys at NBC are steaming at a comment the new hottie laid on them. She said NBC was asleep for 15 years! The NBC group think turned to group stink.

Oh, the tender feelings of hard news newsmen.

Time to sit back and watch NBC for once?

Just joking.

Monday
Aug252014

Some New Texas Indictments Are In Order

Below is a Texas statute used to indict Texas Governor Rick Perry who vetoed tax dollars going to the department of a corrupt, drunk, county prosecutor, Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg, a Democrat, who Governor Perry wanted removed from office.

It is a pretty simple read:

Sec. 36.03. COERCION OF PUBLIC SERVANT OR VOTER. (a) A person commits an offense if by means of coercion he:

(1) influences or attempts to influence a public servant in a specific exercise of his official power or a specific performance of his official duty or influences or attempts to influence a public servant to violate the public servant's known legal duty; or

(2) influences or attempts to influence a voter not to vote or to vote in a particular manner.

(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor unless the coercion is a threat to commit a felony, in which event it is a felony of the third degree.

(c) It is an exception to the application of Subsection (a)(1) of this section that the person who influences or attempts to influence the public servant is a member of the governing body of a governmental entity, and that the action that influences or attempts to influence the public servant is an official action taken by the member of the governing body. For the purposes of this subsection, the term "official action" includes deliberations by the governing body of a governmental entity.

 

Governor Rick Perry just happens to be the head of the office of the Governor of the State of Texas and in that capacity is exempt from this statute.

Or think of it this way:

If a governor of Texas can be indicted for using a veto, why can’t the Travis County Prosecutor be indicted for falsely charging and indicting former US Senator Kay Hutchinson, Congressman Tom Delay or Governor Rick Perry?

The Travis County Prosecutor’s Office under Ronnie Earle had both cases against Hutchinson and Delay thrown out for lack of evidence. After the damage was done

It seems this single Texas County has the ability, because it has the liberal, progressive, corrupt, City of Austin in it, to sway the political landscape of the entire State of Texas on a whim.

It’s almost as bad as New Hampshire where four non-residents, the NH ACLU, and the League of Liberal Woman Voters shop for crooked judges in a county that does not have the State Capitol in it so they can invent a right for non-residents to vote here.

 

Monday
Aug252014

One State And County At A Time

The Virginia Voter Alliance has investigated Fairfax County Virginia for voter fraud, in this case voting in two states, Virginia and Maryland, in the same election and caught 17 confirmed double voters by name, date of birth and last four digits of their S.S #

The Coalition of New Hampshire Taxpayers has sent this same private non-profit voter fraud investigative team voter lists from our state since our NH Secretary of State will NOT join the 28 state cooperative that shares data to catch out of state voters.

Congratulations to Reagan George and the Virginia Voters Alliance!

There are 94 more Virginia counties to go.

If volunteer organizations like The Virginia Voter Alliance can keep catching interstate double voters they may be able to catch the operatives of any organized effort. That would be icing on the cake.

 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Sandra Schwartzman

(301) 230-0045 x100

sschwartzman@rmr.com

www.rmr.com

Fairfax County Electoral Board announced today that the 17 voters identified by the VIRGINIA VOTERS ALLIANCE (VVA) as potential duplicate voters in Maryland and Virginia is 100% correct. 

Letters from the Fairfax Electoral Board have been sent to county, state, and federal law enforcement offices requesting criminal investigations.  These voters are a subset of the original 164 voters in Maryland and Virginia that appeared to have voted in the 2012 election.  This information was presented to both state’s Election Boards in the latter part of May, 2014; to date, there has been no progress reported by either board.

CHANTILLY, VA – August, 25, 2014 - At the end of May, 2014 the Virginia Voters Alliance (VVA) and Election Integrity Maryland (EIM) turned over a file to each of the State Boards of Elections containing both Virginia and Maryland data of people that appeared to be registered in both states.  The file contained 43,893 duplicate voters that appeared to be registered to vote in both states, and there was an additional list of 164 voters that appeared to have voted in both states during the 2012 Presidential election. 

The Fairfax County Electoral Board asked for and received subset lists of voters that reside in Fairfax County.  VVA provided to Fairfax County 10,696 duplicate registrations and 17 apparent duplicate voters.  The Fairfax Board has been aggressively investigating the 17 apparent duplicate voters along with cooperation of the Montgomery County Board; the investigation resulted in all 17 (100%) being identified by their full name, DOB and SSN, demonstrating the immense value and validity of VVA and EIM’s work in this important area.

The Maryland Board of Elections, by contrast, has failed to respond to the confirmations of these dual voters, as well as to do its due diligence to investigate, report, and prosecute clearly illegal, fraudulent voting practices that are in direct violation of federal law and the voting procedures of the United States. This latest data underscores the continued calls for Maryland to correct and update its current system to ensure flagrant dual registrations and other fraudulent electoral behaviors are no longer able to occur.

The Virginia Voters Alliance obtained the voter data for the SBE of Virginia and Maryland and the data was loaded onto a powerful server maintained by rVotes in Rhode Island.  As of this press release, neither board has provided EIM or VVA with updates regarding the status of these parallel investigations

VVA has been asked by several more counties in Virginia to help them in challenging their local boards in investigating duplicate registrations and voters in their county.  VVA has also been asked by several states on the eastern seaboard to conduct additional private crosscheck investigations, since their state refuses to participate in the free Interstate Crosscheck capability offered by the Kansas Secretary of State, Kris Kobach.

The Brennen Center will have to change their talking points … again.  A year or so ago they had to stop claiming that Voter Fraud did not exist because there were too many reported cases, mainly by voter integrity groups like the Virginia Voters Alliance and Election Integrity Maryland and conservative media like Fox News and Watchdog-Virginia. 

Their second talking point was the denial that voter impersonation fraud exists.  We knew this was not true and we were able to prove it by this finding.  Their next point will be that voter fraud is such a small percentage of the overall vote; such voter fraud should be ignored.  What percentage of the overall vote is tolerable for Progressives?  VVA believes we should have zero tolerance for voter fraud in our elections.

Many people think voter fraud only occurs between Democrats and Republicans.  That is not true.  There is Republican-on-Republican voter fraud as evidenced by what went on in Mississippi in the Cochran/McDaniel Senate primary race, as well as, the slating of conservatives here in Virginia.  Or, if you want to hear how Democrat-on-Democrat voter fraud is used as an election weapon, talk to ArtuDavis, the former US representative from Birmingham, Alabama or examine the recent primary elections in New Mexico.

Virginians, and indeed the American people, need to wake up and demand that we have open and honest elections; otherwise, when no one trusts our elections, we will lose our Constitutional Republic. 

About the Virginia Voters Alliance (VVA)

Virginia Voters Alliance is an initiative developed by citizens for citizens, meant to inspire and equip volunteers for involvement at every stage of our electoral process. VVA promotes ideas that actively protect the rights of legitimate voters, regardless of their political party affiliation. The Virginia Voters Alliance was formed to provide a trans-partisan, state-wide organization that is devoted to improving the election laws and voting processes in the Commonwealth of Virginia, which would decrease opportunities for voter fraud, and insure open and honest elections for all citizens of Virginia. For more information, please visit www.virginiavotersalliance.com.

About Election Integrity Maryland (EIM)

Election Integrity Maryland (EIM) is a non-partisan, non-profit volunteer citizen initiative dedicated to upholding free and fair elections as a 501 (c) (4) organization. EIM exists to promote integrity throughout the voting process in Maryland, thereby enhancing the public's confidence in its voting franchise in local, state and federal elections. EIM routinely works to support the efforts of Maryland’s various Boards of Elections in their effort to maintain voter integrity, as well as the interests of Maryland voters. For more information about EIM, please visit: www.ElectionIntegrityMaryland.com

 

Sunday
Aug242014

The Worst Golfer In THe World

When the world is expecting something of substance from you and you are out playing golf – you are the worst golfer in the World.

When you sold yourself as a new kind of international leader and the chance to prove it comes knocking at your door and you are out playing golf – you are the worst golfer in the World.

If you ever bragged about having international expertise and international incidents are actually shoving your national failures off the front page while you play golf – you are the Worst golfer in the World.

When your sense of self importance overshadows your responsibility to American citizens all over the planet and you are out playing golf – you are the worst golfer in the World.

And to top it off, if you are a lousy golfer to begin with and you are simply having American taxpayers fund your compulsion to run away from reality – you are indeed the Worst golfer in the World.

Saturday
Aug162014

Common Sense v. Common Vote Theft

How does the State of Nebraska define Domicile?

Domicile, as you may recall, is the key, and only, word in the NH State Constitution that defines where a NH inhabitant votes.

Here is what the Nebraska Dept. of Revenue says about Domicile:

Domicile.

Domicile is the place an individual has his or her permanent place of abode and home. Even if the individual is absent at times, domicile is the place to which the individual intends to return. Actual residence is not necessarily domicile. An individual establishes domicile in Nebraska on the date he or she arrives in the state for other than temporary or transitory purposes. Once domicile is established, it remains the individual’s domicile until it is abandoned. Domicile in Nebraska is abandoned when an individual leaves the state with no intention of returning to the state and establishes a domicile in another state while present in the other state for other than temporary or transitory purposes.

http://www.revenue.nebraska.gov/info/8-645.pdf

Nebraska is the home of the lead petitioner of the non-resident voter case called Hannah Rivers v. NH that TWO Superior (and insufficiently educated) Court activist judges say magically grants the right to vote in NH to non-residents.

Below is the portion of the Rivers v. NH case where the out-of-state tuitioned UNH student lays out her legal residence:

“PARTIES

10. Petitioner Hannah Rivers lives at 83 Main Street, GSS Box 12764, Durham, New Hampshire. She is 19 years of age and is a citizen of the United States. In August 2011, she came from 585 West Waverly Road, Raymond, Nebraska, to New Hampshire, in order to attend school at the University of New Hampshire. She expects to finish school in May of 2015 and currently intends to leave New Hampshire after graduation. She is licensed to drive in Nebraska.”

Now let us take a look at what the NH State Supreme court said about college voters who want to declare NH their domicile to vote. This is the last and most important part of Newberger v. Peterson 1972:

We are sensitive to the compelling need "to preserve the basic conception of a political community". Dunn v. Blumstein, supra, 92 S. Ct. at 1004. But the challenged New Hampshire law forces persons who are in every meaningful sense members of New Hampshire political communities to vote in communities elsewhere which they have long departed and with whose affairs they are no longer concerned, if indeed the former community still recognizes the right.

You do not have to be a lawyer or a member of the NH AG’s Office or even the NH Secretary of State to understand fraud when you see it.

The Hannah Rivers case has zero merit.

She has no standing to sue NH because she is not abandoning Nebraska as her legal domicile by THEIR laws or OUR NH laws, State Constitution, or previous on point court cases in New Hampshire.

But if you are a New Hampshire voter you should take the time to gather up other NH voters to ensure non-resident voters like Hannah Rivers of Raymond, Nebraska, and thousands like her, can not continue to steal your vote.