Ed Naile, CNHT

Hear Ed Naile every Wednesday morning on WLMW 90.7 FM on the Girard at Large radio show or listen to the archives at Voter Fraud Radio

Keep The Pulitzer, How About Some News

Its Pulitzer Prize time! I love this time of year. It reminds me of when I first figured out how phony the media is.

Set your Way Back Machine for 1980 and our then hero, Janet Cooke, fabricator of a story about an 8 year old heroine addict. She won/earned/acquired/somehow wound up with, a Pulitzer Prize for that concoction. Good for her!

And then, as quickly as it appeared on the scene, the politically correct story began to show signs of leakage – like an extra large soft ice cream cone on an August day, the buyers couldn’t get rid of it fast enough.

The phony Pulitzer Prize winning story of the 8 year old heroine addict was breaking down on the regular news sources, which were limited in those days. So like any “intelligent” person I turned to PBS and the The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour.

On this high-brow, above the fray, independent, news show I was about to find out how news is really reported – or not.

The guests were talking about the fabricated story and how everyone was tricked into believing Mr. Cooke had a real college degree or if that was a fake as well – it was. How could so many super-smart media professionals become so tangled up in this?

After the story broke, one News Hour guest, by phone, was a gentleman who was on the Pulitzer Prize Committee, the people who pick the winner from the list assembled through nominations. The deal is, you get nominated then, they, the committee, picks from that list and there are your winners. It sounds pretty simple.

Every time Lehrer or MacNeil went to this particular committee member he would ask the same question: “How did Mrs. Cooke win a Pulitzer in the first place, because she wasn’t on the list?”

“Back to you Jim,” “Back to you Bob,” “No back to you Jim,” and so it went.

As each person was asked about how this made-up story could have gotten so far without being discovered, the Pulitzer Prize Committee member would ask again: “How does one win the prize if your name wasn’t on the list?”

I thought that simple question might be an interesting, newsy, tidbit for the MacNeil/Leherer “news team” to explore but they repeatedly just passed the guy off and went to another guest. What, no who, what, where and why, follow-up questions? Wouldn’t a question like that get to the heart of the matter?

Never again did I trust those two solemn, studied, award encrusted posers. They were and are, in my opinion, no better than Janet Cooke.


You Belong In Jail Fool!

I was going to write something about the clown who was running for Congress on the moonbat ticket, Gary Dodds, but he is such a pathetic creature I thought it wasn’t worth it - until now.

Dodds was the guy who on April 5 2006, felt he had to get away from the daily grind of the campaign for a while so he feigned a car accident and hid out in the woods, or at some other much warmer place indoors, for some 27 hours, leaving the police and rescue personnel to frantically search for him all during the cold night thinking he was lost. The story was a scam and that fact was apparent from day one. But Mr. Dodds was hell bent to prove it did happen and eventually the cops arrested and charged him.

During the period when a normal trial would have been held for anyone accused of filing a false report with the police, Mr. Dodds found two circus performers posing as NH licensed attorneys to join him in this sit-com and the show began. It was an embarrassing display of blame anyone and everyone else while holding dear your “integrity,” and “compassion for others.”

Dodds lost his case. The jury did not buy it. This is still NH.

As a final kick in the shins to decency, the law, facts, and the jury - members of which possibly had better things to do, Dodds goes on national TV and forgives them. Let’s embarrass the whole state Gary.

Now for the serious business of sentencing.

Judge Fauver, who sat through this comedy, cloaked as a trial, where an adult was willfully engaged in falsifying physical evidence, a felony punishable by up to seven years in prison, as well as leaving the scene of an accident and false public alarms, both misdemeanors each punishable by up to a year in jail, and who used the court system to try to blame police for his actions, finally made his statement and pronounced sentencing.

"You made a mockery of the members of law enforcement who risked their lives, in part, and used their time and their volunteer efforts, many of them, to try to find you," Fauver said.

Then he sentenced Dodds to 20 days in jail and a year with an ankle bracelet.

So in effect, Dodds and his clown act attorneys won! Not bad. This probably cost more than just getting a deal like that up front without a trial but now Dodds can be a victim of the system for the rest of his career. Not a bad gig in the world of moonbat politics.

Fast forward to today’s, April 8, 2008 Union Leader front page…

It seems one “Mr. T” (photo showing a black man) from Manchester, called police the other night about a loud party. When the Manchester Police did not respond quickly, Mr. T called back and claimed to have shot one of the partygoers. Now the police were on the scene and arrested Mr. T for a false report.

There will be no public display of “blame the Manchester Police,” no appearance on national TV with Dane Sawyer, no making a mockery of the NH judicial system any more that they do themselves, no.

Mr. T will be serving 60 days in jail.

Ah, justice.


The Meter Is Running In Windsor

On March 28, The Coalition of Windsor Taxpayers made the front page of the Boston Globe - about time. This sad epoch of municipal mismanagement has been simmering in a stew made up of direct democracy, immoral and incompetent elected officials, and an indifferent/impotent state bureaucracy.

This makes many sane people “bueaucrazy.”

But the Windsor Coalition of Taxpayers soldiers on – as does the reporter from the Globe, who has a nice, fat, two inch binder full of spread sheets our girls in the hood put together for her. Apparently, this looks to the Globe like a story worth a series, or maybe someday, a sit-com – if so much was not at stake.

Credibility certainly is at stake for the NH Dept. of Revenue. Our favorite question to the DRA: “How do you set a town tax rate on non-existent town supplied data?” has shifted to: “How long will you wait for the Town of Windsor elected officials to “audit” the non-existent books?” There are things like copies of checks and deposit slips left behind at the bank. How about a peek at those?

It appears that included with the fact that some taxes have not been collected – or accounted for, in some cases going back to 1996, there is the problem of not having what records the Town does have “audited” since a promise to the DRA that they would do so back in October of last year.

We haven’t even been waiting for a real audit either. Apparently we have been held up by a simple “review” of where Windsor’s appropriations went and what properties paid taxes. In a $500,000.00 total budget where only about $150,000.00 is Town spending, it should not be that hard. Something like $175,000.00, without interest, is uncollected so far, from what we can tell.

I would compare the Windsor Coalition of Taxpayers to a steady, clicking, clock, with a big alarm attached. A sand dial they are not. There has been a quiet running of the clock so far, but a year is long enough to wait for state-mandated financial information from the Windsor Selectmen and their attorney, Paul Apple, of the Upton and Hatfield firm.

Does the State of NH have municipal statutes in place for real or for show?

I guess we will find out soon enough.

Keep and eye on The Globe.


No There, There

Not that it matters much but…

Sen. Barack Obama is being labeled by what poses as serious media nowadays for supposedly fabricating a piece of Obama family history because he said the Kennedy clan donated money to bring his father over to the US.

Here is a small part of the the flimsy argument:

WAPO’s Michael Dobbs March 30, 2008

“Contrary to Obama's claims in speeches in January at American University and in Selma last year, the Kennedy family did not provide the funding for a September 1959 airlift of 81 Kenyan students to the United States that included Obama's father. According to historical records and interviews with participants, the Kennedys were first approached for support for the program nearly a year later, in July 1960. The family responded with a $100,000 donation, most of which went to pay for a second airlift in September 1960.”

And a copy cat:

MSNBC”s Mike Murray

“The Washington Post caught Obama in an exaggeration about the Kennedy family role in getting his father to America. It turns out the Kennedys were not involved in any Kenyan airlifts until after Obama's father was safely in Hawaii. What is it about politicians trying too hard to be a part of history? Sometimes, there isn't a destiny; that's ok too.”

In the world of charities and fungible dollars, to try to make a story out of this seems a tad weak.

If the gang that brought Daddy Obama to our shores is like any other chaity they were paying 1959 bills with 1960 money. The Kennedy’s dropped s nice big check on Kenyan students. There was no exaggeration by Obama worth mentioning.

This is a politically motivated cheap shot at best.


Thank You Senator Estabrook For Looking Out For The Little Guy

I love to compare other school finance disasters with what the school lobby is trying to ram through New Hampshire’s Legislature. Never do you find a pro-Claremont Funding Scam schemer holding any other state up as an example of how education EQUITY – ooops, we call it ADEQUACY now, works so well.

California was the first state to fall victim to a Claremont type extortion suit in the late 70’s. The schools there went from #1 in the country to a paltry 47th now. (All this with a property, sales, and income tax!)

But there is more! Like they didn’t get spanked enough through suits, bait and switch legislation is also “hurting the children’s” taxpaying parents. Here is how it was set up.

I n November of 2000 , California voters passed a ballot initiative known as Proposition 39, which for the first time, permitted school bonds to be approved with a 55% “super- majority” as an alternative to the historic 66%. They took the bait.

Since the pass age of Proposition 39, Californian’s school construction proponents have had the choice of whether to seek the old 66% supermajority thought special elections, or the new lower hurdle of 55% if they put the bond measure on a regularly scheduled ballot, limit the size of the bond, and agree to abide by several administrative requirements.

Local elections that rely on 55% approval have been very successful, with more than 80% passing!

Prior to 2001, more than 40% of local school bonds failed. From 1998 through November 2006, local bond elections generated $36.1 billion for school facilities.

Of the 931 elections under the two-thirds requirement from 1986 through 2006, 55% succeeded. Of the 393 elections relying on 55% approval between 2001 and 2006, 83% succeeded.

If you want to pass a school bond in California, a good old-fashioned political campaign is all you need – not necessarily a good plan for a new school to sell to voters. Turnout is the key to passing a 20 or 30 year bond, so along with the bricks piling up - so did the bond debt.

Now its 2008 and the State of California is in a financial squeeze of $16 billion dollars. Where do you suppose, frugil NH voter, that much red ink bling is going to come from – seeing as the Govenator borrowed billions to balance the budget last time around?

It looks like the public schools – which now depend on STATE money more than ever, may have to take a slight hit of about $4.8 billion.

And then we have The Granite State.

We have a pending Claremont scam suit promising MORE free state money to offset the dreaded, stable, locally controlled, property tax. (Its all “up there ^” in an alien transport vessel tucked behind the dark side of the moon.)

But this isn’t over!

We have an opportunity to stack up local bond debt in NH just like our friends in California are now going to pay for with a property tax instead of all the free state dollars. It is called:


AN ACT relative to the vote required for passage of school bonds.

SPONSORS: Sen. Estabrook, Dist 21; Sen. Kelly, Dist 10; Rep. M. Smith, Straf 7

COMMITTEE: Public and Municipal Affairs


This bill changes the required majority vote for passage of notes or bonds issued by a school district from 2/3 to 3/5.

Get the picture?