Ed Naile, CNHT

Hear Ed Naile every Wednesday morning on WLMW 90.7 FM on the Girard at Large radio show or listen to the archives at Voter Fraud Radio

The World's Most "Exclusive" Club

Well the all white, Democrat controlled, US Senate turned the fire hoses on one Ronald Burris today. Man this new 111th Congress is off to a great start.


The given reason that this groundbreaking black politician from Illinois was kept from taking a seat in the US Senate is, according to Democrat Senate Leader Harry Reid, because he is tainted by Illinois Democrat Governor Rod Blagojevich’s arrest for a standard Chicago “pay-to-play” scheme.


How on Earth will anyone in Illinois Democrat circles ever get ahead with this kind of standard? It is so unfair.


And it is so un-Democratic to use a phony-baloney excuse like “tainted by scandal” to slow the Democrat process.


December 19, 1998 the US House impeached Billy Bob Clinton. Did that stop any appointments by the “Sex Offender in Chief?”


Unless my news radar has lead me wrong Billy-Bob was recently considered as a temp US Senator for the empty Senate Seat in New York until Princess Caroline can be appointed/anointed.


April 1999. Billy-Bob Clinton was disbarred and lost his license to practice law. But he is one of the most admired Democrat Presidents to ever have twice taken office with less than a majority vote. Only Obama has a higher level of worship from liberals than Clinton.


Yet black Democrat Roland Burris ain’t good enough for the US Senate?


Roland Burris wasn’t impeached.

Roland Burris never sexually assaulted, bit, fondled, groped, or left stains on any underlings.

Roland Burris never lost his law license.

Roland Burris has never been found guilty of perjury.

Roland Burris was an attorney general just like Billy-Bob Clinton.


But the Most Ethical Congress in US history doesn’t see fit to let him in?


I think it is interesting as well that Democrats would ask this black Democrat to PROMISE to not run for this temporary office in two years?


What, Harry Reid is for TERM LIMITS all of a sudden?




Why Not Just Shut It Down

God help us.


“WASHINGTON (AP) - Two Democratic officials say President-elect Barack Obama has chosen former Clinton White House chief of staff Leon Panetta to run the CIA. Panetta was a surprise pick for the post, with no experience in the intelligence world. An Obama transition official and another Democrat disclosed his nomination on a condition of anonymity since it was not yet public.”

What’s next, Sandy Burger as his second in command?


I shouldn’t even joke about that.


Luckily Democrat Bill “Butterfingers” Richardson is busy being investigated so he won’t lose atomic secrets to the Chinese AGAIN.


This makes it official. Obama doesn’t have enough experience to pick sane people for important posts. All his pals in Chicago are currently under investigation, headed there, indicted or convicted, so he has to reach out and re-run the Clinton nightmare.


New Mexico Democrat Governor Bill Richardson Off To Spend More Time With His Family

It’s hard to keep track of the players without a scorecard but I am trying.


Looks like President of the World-Elect Barack Hussein Obama has lost another one-of-a-kind “Change” appointments to his cabinet.


Quick, get me another Chicano!


Democrat Bill Richardson is under investigation by the Feds for his involvement with a company that consults with government bodies regarding financing of large capital projects. The firm is now called CDR Financial but has operated under other names.


See my December 15 article for details.


Richardson is backing away from Barack Historic Obama’s offer to be his commerce secretary even though Richardson has claimed there is nothing funny going on and he hopes to be cleared.


Yawn, heard that all before.





Has Obama Commented On This Yet?

Prince Riley, a spokesman for black Illinois Democrat Roland Burris, whom Governor Rod Blagojevich lawfully appointed to replace Barack Obama, had this to say about efforts to seat his boss in the open Illinois seat in the US Senate:


“It’s interesting that all those who are viable are white women and the ones who are unacceptable are black men.”


Back on December 3, 2008 high and mighty US Senator Harry Reid had a phone conversation with Illinois Govern Rod Blagojevich about filling the open seat. Blagojevich claims Reid didn’t want any of the black candidates Blagojevich offered.


In effect we have:


Now found out that DEMOCRAT US Senator Harry Reid is a racist, or DEMOCRAT Governor Rod Blagojevich has pulled an old fashioned trick on Dirty Harry by playing the race card on the lilly white Senator from Nevada just like he was some sort of Republican.


Either way, Americans who want to look now have a window into the soul of what makes up a liberal Democrat these days. Pretty damn disgusting isn't it?


Like it or not, Roland Burris is as qualified as Princess Caroline Kennedy to be a US Senator. If for no other reason than the qualifications for such office have sunk to such low depths that skin color and family name are the top qualifications.


Nutty Professors vs. Liberal Moonbats

Karl Marx described a political theory called “parliamentary cretinism in which a group of wanna-be commies delude themselves into thinking a pure socialist society can be achieved by peaceful, parliamentary means.

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, bad hair day sufferers from the 1850’s, considered this a bad way to start a socialist movement, knowing elections and legislatures would only waste time and allow reactionary forces (patriots) to grow ever stronger. Take heart my conservative friends. According to what I am reading we scare the first “Two Stooges.”

Friedrich Engels said this about parliamentary cretinism:

'Parliamentary cretinism' is an incurable disease, an ailment whose unfortunate victims are permeated by the lofty conviction that the whole world, its history and its future are directed and determined by a majority of votes of just that very representative institution that has the honour of having them in the capacity of its members.

Stay with me.


So I am reading about this parliamentary cretinism theory/belief/fairy tale stuff using my laser beam New Hampshire municipal activist, tree surgeon perspective and here is what I conclude:


My new pal Friedrich Engels has described perfectly liberal moonbats for me in one short paragraph, something I have been trying to do for years. I especially love the “lofty conviction” label he gives his fellow travelers. It also seems he doesn’t think liberal moonbats have the guts to impose communism the old fashion way, by violent revolution.


This may have something to do with the liberal moonbat aversion to owning guns.


Engels does kind of misuse the word “victims” a bit claiming his moonbat friends are such when we all know the real victims are the people who suffer FROM moonbats, but twisting facts is Engels stock and trade. He was trying to sell his fancy communist ideas after all.


Make no mistake though. Engels was not a big fan of the weak sister of communism, parliamentary cretinism, also known these days as - PC.