Ed Naile, CNHT

Hear Ed Naile every Wednesday morning on WLMW 90.7 FM on the Girard at Large radio show or listen to the archives at Voter Fraud Radio

The BookWORM Loses Again!!

"The universally applicable requirements of Indiana's voter-identification law are eminently reasonable. The burden of acquiring, possessing and showing a free photo identification is simply not severe, because it does not 'even represent a significant increase over the usual burdens of voting,” so said US Supreme Court Justice Scalia in the recent decision over voter identification.

This ruling is going to shake up our ever more lax election process in America.

One of the dissenters in the Voter ID case was the tiny mind from New Hampshire, David Souter. If there was some way for New Hampshire to apologize to the rest of the country for this guy being on the Supreme Court we should do it. He is an utter embarrassment.

Here is his David Souter’s flimsy, paper thin, excuse for handing a vehicle for voter fraud to those who wield it in election after election: Voter ID, "threatens to impose nontrivial burdens on the voting rights of tens of thousands of the state's citizens," “targets of the law, he said, are "voters who are poor and old."

What, no racial connection Mr. Souter? Where is your liberal bleeding heart? I thought you guys never passed up a chance to label your opponents as racists.

In any case you lost, thank goodness only two moonbat justices sided with you.

David Souter, sad, sad, little man.


Call Moe and Shemp Next Time

I got a message from one of the people in our CNHT office, Judy, the gracious, talented, professional, secretary who works here with Cornerstone Policy Network, that they received a phone call from a very, very unhappy New Hampshire state representative. (Sorry Judy, they let almost anyone have a phone these days so you have to listen to cranks now and then.)

Immediately I thought, hmm; state representative, angry, calls non-profit to bitterly complain about receiving and invitation to a prayer meeting – must be a liberal.

Bingo! Some character named Larry Brown, of Strafford, who, unfortunately for New Hampshire, won a seat in the Legislature back in 2004, is upset enough at being invited to a prayer breakfast for legislators he had to take time from his busy schedule to call and complain about it.

I was told he wants “off the CPR list.”

News flash Larry!!!!!

The “list” your name is on is the roster of State Legislators.

What a surprise. This is the same mistake one former State Rep., Ray Buckley, made a few years back when he sent CPR a prissy letter asking to be taken “off the list.” We printed his letter in our Taxing Times newspaper for statewide enjoyment because it was so amusing.

So I took the time to look up Rep Larry Brown’s legislative record to see what kind of a liberal he is.

Heavy reading for sure, not many State Representatives would tackle the third rail of all legislation like Larry did in his recent and only bill this session, his masterpiece, the all consuming - House Bill 1221. Here is the most important issue of our time, according to Representative Larry:

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 New Paragraph; Powers and Duties; Trees. Amend RSA 289:7 by inserting after paragraph II the following new paragraph:

III. Cemetery trustees shall have the power to control and preserve all shrubs, trees, and other greenery within the cemetery, within the right of way of the cemetery, and which extend over the border of the cemetery. No one shall remove or otherwise damage shrubs, trees, and other greenery which is on cemetery property, within the right of way of the cemetery, or which extends over the border of the cemetery without the written permission of a majority of the board of cemetery trustees or municipal equivalent.

Another news flash Rep. Larry!

Under RSA 289:7 Cemetery trustees already have power over the trees and shrubs in and around the cemetery, in sections 289:7 I (a-b-c-d).

Maybe that is why your bill was voted, Inexpedient to Legislate.

You know, Rep. Larry, Cornerstone Policy Network has some talented people that answer their phones. Maybe we can get one of them to find you a number for some counseling.


Can I Get A Recycled Amen

Here is a borrowed Wikipedia definition of religion – for lack of something better.

A religion is a set of beliefs and practices, often centered upon specific supernatural and moral claims about reality, the cosmos, and human nature, and often codified as prayer, ritual, and religious law. Religion also encompasses ancestral or cultural traditions, writings, history, and mythology, as well as personal faith and mystic experience. The term "religion" refers to both the personal practices related to communal faith and to group rituals and communication stemming from shared conviction.

You have already heard all about how if you don’t follow a certain path to “enlightenment” your entire world will end in eternal flames.

There is the moral code of doing what is expected of you towards the greater good.

And you certainly have to believe in this supernatural claim even though it is not something you can touch or see, or that science can explain.

It is all about faith.

Welcome to EARTH DAY!

But I could be wrong.

Socialism refers to the goal of a socio-economic system in which property and the distribution of wealth are subject to control by the community.[1] This control may be either direct—exercised through popular collectives such as workers' councils—or indirect—exercised on behalf of the people by the state. As an economic system, socialism is often characterized by state, worker, or community ownership of the means of production, goals which have been attributed to, and claimed by, a number of political parties and governments throughout history.

Here is a little quote from Gaylord Nelson – creator of Earth Day:

The economy is a wholly owned subsidiary of the environment, not the other way around.

In any case, Earth Day is probably some sort of moonbat hybrid. So enjoy!

We only have weeks to live before our tiny planet heats up, freezes, floods, dries out, then gets hit by a meteor.


Like Impeachement Is Groovy

Dateline Concord:

I just left my post as a protestor protesting protestors, it was tough on the prostate. I could have wet myself laughing and anyone with me would have called it justified.

Of course I am talking about the biggest socks and sandals event in Concord – the “Impeach George Bush Moonbat Rally and Men’s Ponytail and Scruffy Beard Exhibition at the Capital Theater.”

It was a packed house – not by a long shot. About half the left wing angry/crazies were from out of state. But that is typical of gambling, homosexual marriage, and union bills in the legislature as well – from my humble observations over the years.

Now my “job” at the protest of the protesters was to hold up my home made sign which said “waste $” and make revealing comments about moonbats to cars passing by. No problem.

I was singing Moonbat River, announcing the tofu tasting party menu for later, warning drivers about the money burning in the Statehouse, and most importantly, telling people that sandals and socks were required dress. All this is standard stuff.

We had a Vermont “reporter” with a great 18-20 inch ponytail come try to argue with my comrade protesters. He gave up and left. Some tired looking female moonbats stopped by to express themselves. You know the type – low maintenance.

But the highlight was some middle aged gal – crew cut hair, surprise, who wanted to get into a shouting match with one of our guys, bla, bla, bla, all the liberal checklist items and then she dropped the big one – “this country was built on slavery.”

Whenever they stoop to this I rise above it and sing Moonbat River even louder.

If these 60’s lefties rented the Capital Theater for the 100 people who showed up they should have their heads exhamined.


Stupid Is As Epping Does

Epping resident Tom Sutliff’s Attorney, Chuck Douglass, sent me the 41 page Federal Court ruling on Compeled Speech violations in Tom’s Town of Epping.

I’ll boil it down - Tom and his group, EPRG, win!

Tom did not get everything he wanted from the case but I would call having the Federal Court rule that the Epping selectmen violated Tom Sutliff’s constitutional rights by denying him the ability to link his taxpayer activist site to the town’s website without first handing over to the Select Board a detailed financial report and membership list of his group – something the tax and spend groupies did not have to do to link to the town site a big step forward.

For some unknown reason, the Federal Court got mired down in a recent Supreme Court ruling about a meat producers association and some federal bureaucracy about compelled speech, which has NOTHING to do with local legislative bodies, taxpayers, and municipal government. I guess having the same title on your case must mean something – who knows. In any case a part of the action Tom Sutliff brought will have to wait for another NH violation to take action on.

So go ahead Epping, keep on sending out taxpayer funded opinion pieces selling your tax and spend political positions to the voters without offering equal space to taxpayers like EPRG or anyone else. And show everyone who is boss by trying to pry a membership list and financial statement out of a private taxpayer group in exchange for linking to your taxpayer funded web site. Smart move.

All these shenanigans will make great reading in the court depositions you will have to sit through later on.