"The universally applicable requirements of Indiana's voter-identification law are eminently reasonable. The burden of acquiring, possessing and showing a free photo identification is simply not severe, because it does not 'even represent a significant increase over the usual burdens of voting,” so said US Supreme Court Justice Scalia in the recent decision over voter identification.
This ruling is going to shake up our ever more lax election process in America.
One of the dissenters in the Voter ID case was the tiny mind from New Hampshire, David Souter. If there was some way for New Hampshire to apologize to the rest of the country for this guy being on the Supreme Court we should do it. He is an utter embarrassment.
Here is his David Souter’s flimsy, paper thin, excuse for handing a vehicle for voter fraud to those who wield it in election after election: Voter ID, "threatens to impose nontrivial burdens on the voting rights of tens of thousands of the state's citizens," “targets of the law, he said, are "voters who are poor and old."
What, no racial connection Mr. Souter? Where is your liberal bleeding heart? I thought you guys never passed up a chance to label your opponents as racists.
In any case you lost, thank goodness only two moonbat justices sided with you.
David Souter, sad, sad, little man.