Ed Naile, CNHT

Hear Ed Naile every Wednesday morning on WLMW 90.7 FM on the Girard at Large radio show or listen to the archives at Voter Fraud Radio

Hannah Rivers Has Second Thoughts?

Hannah Rivers Revisited - 2015

The case before the NH State Supreme Court May 22, 2015 is about an offensive, to non-resident voters, legislative addition to our NH Election law, RSA 654:7, that informs a registering voter that they must follow all NH statutes when declaring NH their domicile to vote. Domicile is the requirement of our State Constitution for any newly registering inhabitant the age of 18, Part I Article II, second sentence.

The case is now titled Annemarie Guare v. State of NH because it seems Hannah Rivers is no longer listed as a litigant.

Here is how Hannah Rivers is described in the original case of “mobile domiciled” college voters:


“10. Petitioner Hannah Rivers lives at 83 Main Street, GSS Box 12764, Durham, New Hampshire . She is 19 years of age and is a citizen of the United States. In August 2011, she came from 585 West Waverly Road , Raymond , Nebraska , to New Hampshire , in order to attend school at the University of New Hampshire . She expects to finish school in May of 2015 and currently intends to leave New Hampshire after graduation. She is licensed to drive in Nebraska.”

May approaches and Hannah Rivers will graduate from UNH after attempting, with the help of the NH ACLU, NH League of Women Voters, and former Superior Court activist Judge Lewis, to water down the rights of domiciled NH citizen’s votes by staying a Nebraska citizen but voting here in NH where she goes to college.

About that NH vote Hannah Rivers “cherishes” so much.

As of today, April 27, 2015, Hannah Rivers is not a registered NH voter!

Here is Hannah Rivers LinkedIn page:


So it looks like the phony mobile domicile case had a phony lead petitioner.

How appropriate.



A Case Of "Let's Pretend"

Today I went to the embarrassment that is the NH State Supreme Court today and watched the NH Attorney General’s Office representative, in the most recent incarnation of the “Mobile Domicile” case, stutter and hem and haw his way to its illogical end. This NH AG lawyer, a Mr. Labonte, stood there as Justice Hughes said all it takes to be a voter in NH is to be an inhabitant and 18 years of age. Labonte never flinched.

The quote from the Supreme Court Justice missed the mark a bit but Mr. Labonte let him get away with it.

Here is what the NH Constitution says in regards to the qualifications of voters in NH. You will find the meat of it is in the first two sentences of Part I Article 11:

[Art.] 11. [Elections and Elective Franchises.] All elections are to be free, and every inhabitant of the state of 18 years of age and upwards shall have an equal right to vote in any election. Every person shall be considered an inhabitant for the purposes of voting in the town, ward, or unincorporated place where he has his domicile.

But Mr. Labonte either wasn’t smart enough or inclined to point that out to Justice Hughes. No, he was stuck on keeping a wide gap in the meaning of “residence” for voting purposes, and the word “domicile’ which is a legal term for “legal residence.” Everyone knows that but because all the parties seem bent on finding a way to allow non-resident college students to vote in NH, we pretend words don’t mean what they mean in Black’s Law Dictionary, countless election law cases, 49 other states, and federal elections.

Here is the Guare v. NH case:


Funny thing about the meaning of “residence” for voting in New Hampshire and the lead plaintiff in this fiasco, though.

The lead plaintiff this time is one Annemarie Guare of Bangor, Maine. She has, according to Mr. Labonte, stated that the term “resident” in our election laws was confusing and that is why the NH ACLU and NH League of Women Voters is challenging a part of the law that says that upon becoming a voter in NH you have to obey all NH laws, such as registering a car and getting a NH driver’s license.

In Maine, Election Laws come under Title 21-A where Maine voters have certain familiar requirements.

See if this makes sense.

Annemarie is a Maine voter, and driver, who does not understand NH Election Laws and feels disenfranchised.

Here is the Maine requirement to be a registered voter:

§111. General qualifications

A person who meets the following requirements may vote in any election in a municipality, including a biennial municipal caucus held pursuant to section 311. [2005, c. 387, §1 (AMD).]

1. Citizenship.  The person must be a citizen of the United States.

[ 2005, c. 387, §1 (AMD) .]

2. Age.  The person must be at least 18 years of age, except that, to vote in a political party's primary election or municipal caucus, the person must be at least 18 years of age as of the date of the next general election.

[ 2005, c. 387, §1 (AMD) .]

3. Residence.  The person must have established and maintain a voting residence in that municipality.

[ 2005, c. 387, §1 (AMD) .]

Apparently this college student knows that she had to give a legal address for a “residence” in Maine to vote there and to get a Maine driver’s license, but she comes to NH and pays out-of-state tuition to UNH. That must be a brain teaser.

Annemarie Guare also wants to vote here in NH but stay a Maine “resident.” No wonder she might be confused. But it isn’t NH’s fault.

Here is another Maine Election Law:

§112. Residence for voting purposes

1. Residence.  The residence of a person is that place where the person has established a fixed and principal home to which the person, whenever temporarily absent, intends to return.

A. The following factors may be offered by an applicant and considered by a registrar in determining a person's residence under this section. The registrar need not find all of these factors to be present in order to conclude that an applicant qualifies to register to vote in the municipality:

(1) A direct statement of intention by the person pursuant to section 121, subsection 1;

(2) The location of any dwelling currently occupied by the person;

(6) The place where any motor vehicle owned by the person is registered;

(8) The residence address, not a post office box, shown on a current income tax return;

(9) The residence address, not a post office box, at which the person's mail is received;

(10) The residence address, not a post office box, shown on any current resident hunting or fishing licenses held by the person;

(12) The residence address, not a post office box, shown on any motor vehicle operator's license held by the person;

(14) The receipt of any public benefit conditioned upon residency, defined substantially as provided in this subsection; or

(16) Any other objective facts tending to indicate a person's place of residence. [2009, c. 253, §10 (AMD).]

In Maine, the term “residence” for voting means “legal residence” or for a more correct description, “domicile” as our NH Founding Fathers used in our Constitution.

Somehow, Annemarie Guare managed to cope with that linguistic treachery in Maine where she found a way to get a driver’s license and register to vote. Her complaint is nothing more than attempt to steal a vote from a qualified NH voter through our court system. Annemarie Guare is in no way disenfranchised by our election laws or by the State of Maine. But she is, as the other litigants were before her, a pawn in a cynical attempt to flood NH with out-of-state voters.

One thing I noticed during today’s hearing. No one referenced Black’s Law Dictionary to find the meaning of the words that were so important to the case?

Watch this stupid case drag on beyond 2016.












Today I deleted Drudge from my favorites. I just couldn’t take it any longer.

Every time I click on Drudge it seems a picture of that thing Bill Clinton married comes up. She has the wide open eye stretch going on or some absolutely fake smile spread across her mug.

But when I have to look her AND their daughter Sasquatch as well – enough!

The Arkansas Mafia has made millions for itself and I hope if she does win the presidency her incompetence will force this country to the point citizens will “fix’ it on their own, state by state.

But until that time I need a break. I can’t stomach looking at her on Drudge any longer. No other news aggregate has to have an image with her story every time.

Imagine how the Cherokee Indian’s supporters feel looking at Mrs. Rodham?

That is the one saving grace about 2016, watching elites watch the most leftist hope they have had since Obama sit it out at Harvard grinningly spinning tales of utopia if only we crush capitalism and divide the wealth among “each other.” (Why isn’t Hiawatha teaching at a poor college by the way?)

When it comes to a certain reoccurring inevitable candidate who has to announce her campaign on Twitter because she can’t draw a crowd anywhere in America, I think both sides have their reservations about looking at her.



Pay Your Student Loans AND Taxes?

I was driving back from Pennsylvania Tuesday evening and heard an offer made in a radio commercial about having student loans forgiven if the debtor had a certain career path such as a police officer or fireman. I think that is how it went.


What struck me was the other “occupation” a person could work at in order to have student loans forgiven (paid for by others) and that was if one worked for a non-profit.

That is interesting.

I wonder what kind of non-profit one would have to work for to get a free, taxpayer-funded college education – after promising to pay for it oneself, of course.

It certainly wouldn’t be one of the conservative non-profits that IRS criminal Lois Lerner denied non-profit status. Those non-profits are still in limbo while the social justice majors are crunching data for Hillary 2016.


Turn Your Head, Cough And Vote

This is a great idea, a national license plate tracking system! And our friends at Homeland Security will run it.


Think of the possibilities.

On Election Day the people who have the system can call voters directly in their cars when they run the “Get Out the Vote Campaign.” Each town or ward will have trackers, like we do now, who use their cell phones to get voters to the polls as well as the trackers who are out knocking on doors. Only this election they can get you in your Subaru Wagon, Volvo, or Audi and track whether or not you are heading to the polls.

The party that believes in privacy has to be excited at the possibilities. If you cross reference the voters who are on some sort of public assistance with voters who are on ObamaCare, Social Security, had an abortion recently, or who might have a criminal record, it will be easy to direct a call with the matching message.

No wonder Hillary feels so invincible.