WHEREAS: Booooom!

Any time one wants to understand how progressives will act when in control of anything of value, all you need to do is see what they feel is important through their political pronouncements.

Take for example how the moonbat enclave of Cambridge, Ma. became a sanctuary city in 1985.

Policy Order Resolution 

   O-16

  ORIGINAL ORDER

  IN CITY COUNCIL

  May 8, 2006

COUNCILLOR SIMMONS 

VICE MAYOR TOOMEY 

COUNCILLOR SULLIVAN 

COUNCILLOR DECKER 

MAYOR REEVES 

COUNCILLOR DAVIS 

COUNCILLOR MURPHY 

WHEREAS:

 The City of Cambridge has been enriched and built by generations of immigrants; and

WHEREAS:

 Cambridge has a proud history as a Sanctuary city, as declared by City Council Order Number 4 of April 8, 1985; and

WHEREAS: There are now approximately 12 million undocumented immigrants in the United States who have been systematically denied the opportunity enjoyed by past generations of immigrants to become legal permanent residents or citizens of this country; and

WHEREAS: Over the past two decades, immigration policy has become even more restrictive and punitive and closed off avenues previously available for immigrants to obtain legal permanent residency, while the US-Mexico border has been further militarized; and

WHEREAS: While borders have been closed off to people over the past two decades, they have been simultaneously opened up to trade and capital; and

WHEREAS: These same “free trade” economic policies, have increased poverty and decreased opportunities for people to make a dignified living and support their families; and

WHEREAS: In 2005, record numbers of migrants seeking a means to support their families, with no alternative to migrate safely into the United States, perished in the desert along the US-Mexico border, while countless others lost their lives in the journey; and

WHEREAS: The migration experience has adverse emotional and psychological effects on families, who are kept apart for many years due to unjust immigration policies and backlogs in visa applications; and

WHEREAS: Undocumented immigrants are especially vulnerable to workplace abuses and housing discrimination; and

WHEREAS: Current US immigration policy does not reflect our standards of what is just, humane and moral; and

WHEREAS: Both undocumented and documented immigrants in the U.S. fuel our economy and those of their countries of origin; and

WHEREAS: On December 16, 2005, the House of Representatives passed HR-4437, which would have drastic consequences for nearly all immigrants to this country, their families, their neighbors and those who support them; and

WHEREAS: The US Senate is currently considering a companion bill to HR-4437 that contains many of the same counterproductive, misguided measures, including criminalization of immigrants and those who help them, further militarization of the border, turning police into immigration agents and erosion of cherished legal traditions such as due process; and

WHEREAS: The US Senate is also considering guest worker programs that would create a second-class citizenry without basic rights that would be disenfranchised and would be vulnerable to exploitation by unscrupulous employers; and

WHEREAS: Much of the public discourse surrounding immigration has taken on a tone that ranges from irrational to racist, as seen in the use of language such as “illegal” and “alien” to describe immigrants, which has a dehumanizing effect and helps justify policies that seek to criminalize and exclude immigrants; and

WHEREAS: Raids carried out by the federal government, ranging from the highly publicized nationwide workplace raids on April 17, 2006 that resulted in the arrest of 1,187 employees, to the less widely-known sweeps of homes such as occurred in Massachusetts on March 6, 2006, have instilled fear and panic in immigrant communities and created environments that are ripe for intimidation, harassment and racial profiling; and

WHEREAS: Following the raids in April, the US Homeland Security Secretary announced that it would be intensifying such enforcement measures, an announcement that came in the midst of unprecedented numbers of immigrants demonstrating in defense of their dignity, against HR-4437, and for an opportunity to obtain legal permanent residency; and

WHEREAS: The cities of Maywood, Huntington Park and Coachella, CA have resurrected the spirit of the Sanctuary City movement in recent months and declared themselves Sanctuary Cities, and cities such as San Francisco and Chicago have reaffirmed their commitments as a Sanctuary Cities; now therefore, be it

RESOLVED: That the City of Cambridge reaffirm its commitment as a Sanctuary City, as declared by City Council Order Number 4 of April 8, 1985; and be it further

RESOLVED: That the City of Cambridge endorses the platform of the National Alliance of Latin American and Caribbean Communities’ Keep Our Families Together Campaign:

Legal permanent residency for all undocumented immigrants.

Expedition of family visas.

Visionary program for future migration flows that respects the rights of immigrants as workers and as human beings.

The social, political and economic integration of new immigrants into US society;

and be it further

RESOLVED: That the US Department of Homeland Security and the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement be called upon to issue a moratorium on raids until the US congress comes to an agreement on comprehensive immigration reform so that the debate can be carried out in good faith, rather than against a backdrop of fear, repression and intimidation; and be it further

RESOLVED: That the City of Cambridge affirms the basic human rights and dignity and every human being; and be it further

RESOLVED: That the City of Cambridge rejects the use of the word “illegal” to describe human beings and the use of the word “aliens” to describe immigrants and hereby adopts the language “undocumented” when referring to those who do not have federally recognized resident status and “immigrant” to refer to those who have migrated to the US from another country; and be it further

RESOLVED: That the Cambridge City Council hereby urges the United States Senate to defeat HR 4437 and does hereby urge the President of the United States to veto such legislation if it is in fact approved by the Senate; and be it further

RESOLVED: That the City Clerk be and hereby is requested to forward suitably engrossed copy of this resolution to the Massachusetts Congressional delegation on behalf of the entire City Council.

Little More Than A Meat Market

The next progressive logical step in a total, undefined in the US Constitution, “right.”

You let US Supreme Court liberals make up a right and there is no telling where it will end. http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/video-planned-parenthood-official-argues-right-post-birth-abortion_712198.htmlnd

Live born babies right to live are now, according to the US Supreme Court and Planned Abortion Hoods, subject to the whims of a woman’s doctor and herself – a natural step in moving America - forward.

Just like homosexual marriage has no limits, like a real marriage does, it should not take that long for progressives to determine and demand marriage evolve into several more, expanded, forward looking creations.

Liberals always look at babies and children as pawns, not whole human beings.

They trap children in public schools.

They look for ways to make abortion into a right equal to any other right a person is blessed with at birth. That is the “up is down and down is up” theory of progressivism.

Liberals want to have babies several ways – usable and disposable.

But what liberals will never conquer is this a simple fact.

When a small child from an experimental coupling of any combination of men or women of the same sex sees a real couple from a traditional marriage with a mother and father, they will always want to know where their dad or mom is. That desire for a real family will never go away with any man made law of order from plutocrats and elites. It is part of human nature.

So killing babies on a table at Planned Abortion Hood’s shop of horrors might be a long held desire of the left and someday endorsed by our courts, it will always be infanticide, even if it gets a more acceptable name, like pro-choice, from the left.

And They Will Not Like The Publicity

While documenting non-resident voters from 2008 and 20012 who came here to steal domiciled NH voter’s rights, I have come up with a somewhat standard description of a vote thief.

Here it is:

1. The vote thief went to an average high school somewhere else in the US, but sometimes a private school.

2. They were part of a non-contact sport like track, swimming, skiing, soccer, etc. (This jives with my suspicion they have never been punched in the face for doing something stupid.)

3. They got some sort of free ride to college or were from a wealthy family who sent them to Hanover hoping they would grow the hell up.

4. In almost every case they were given a three month to a year of international travel as part of their learning experience.

5. Most importantly - college. They have to have gone to some isolation chamber of uniform thought and action.

6. Social media is a lynch pin of moonbat vote thieves. They LOVE to write about how they intend to vote here and often hint at a fellow vote thief they know of in their tiny circle who intends to do the same.

7. An unhealthy worship of Obama and the things he will do.

8. Some brief banter about social justice/equality. Not enough to tell if they know what they are talking about.

9. And most important, they know exactly, not instinctively, who is to be mocked and belittled, as per Alinsky rules.

There you have it.

When doing background checks in this state and the home state of vote thieves in NH that is what to look for in your candidate’s bio.

Free To Leave

Think of it this way.

If NH is one of the top “free” states and New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, California to name a few are the least free states then moonbats have a great opportunity to move to a wonderful un-free state and have the time of their life!

But that, like most things moonbat, is exactly the opposite of reality in their world of, up is down and down is up.

Liberals do not like to pay taxes. That means payroll, property, sales, nothing. They would not think of willingly moving to a high tax state to “invest with the rest” - take a government or education job, maybe, but to help save the un-free state from economic ruin – no way.

The recent list of “free places to live” has NH right up there with the Dakotas and Tennessee, so naturally, moonbat flock to NH like birds who leave droppings in their nest until they have to fly away.

California is a prime example of what progressives want to do to NH.

I have seen a “Best Places to Live” list for liberals and it was based on:

Good coffee shops

The Arts (moonbat sleeping in a glass box)

Colleges

Hospitals

Bla, bla, bla

But the moonbats do not flock there in numbers significant to keep the population from dwindling.

Real people need to find a way to create an atmosphere in which liberals want to leave a freedom-loving, low tax states and go headlong into a highly regulated, expensive, Democrat controlled state.

Just kidding, that will never happen. Freedom is just too inviting for socialist control freaks.

Moonbats 101

For about two weeks Rush Limbaugh has been dissecting progressive political activities and how they win over low information voters through deception, media spin, and re-inventing meanings for words and basic math.

It is worth a listen as he goes through all the misconceptions of what conservatives often think about how liberals approach issues.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/03/28/fascinating_piece_substantiates_my_theory_about_how_low_information_voters_get_their_news

I have been doing some interstate driving and have had a chance to hear Rush for most of his show. It has been pretty much a free college credit on understanding moonbats. The Friday show with callers should be a good examle of how much listeners understand his new direction.

Although Rush has not come up with a simple statement that describes liberals and their campaigns like he did the Kelo Decision for instance: “It is permissible for the government to take and use but not take and give.”

I imagine he will boil liberals and progressives down to a simple formula in a few weeks. That is his genius. I would recommend tuning him in for that opportunity. He is touching on things I have hoped he would for a long time.

As usual, most low information voters who fall prey to progressive sales pitches. But to combat it and offer an alternative that catches attention you need to know why socialism seems so inviting to the uniformed.

Mark Levin is doing the same thing on his radio program, digging into the basics.

Conservatives should be paying close attention to how the people like Limbaugh and Levin, who understand progressivism the best, teach newcomers how to spot it, understand it, and deal with it.

Hey, there isn’t anything else going on.