« SOP 14: Children: "Mine" or "Ours" | Main | 2008 Democrat Convention Rerun of 1980 »

Why I'm a Republican

Raised by a single mother who venerated the Democratic Party, it was of course only natural that I as a child would defend that party’s policies and candidates to my friends and extended family members. I still remember championing Michael Dukakis in 1988, and cheering for Bill Clinton on election night in 1992. Clinton still got my vote in 1996, the first year I could cast a ballot for president. On my hour-long bus rides to school, I’d read the paper and try to reconcile the Democratic platform with what my mind said was right: that taxes should be lower, that markets operate best when left alone, and that it’s not right to inconvenience a few for the benefit of the majority.

And then, between my undergraduate degree and my graduate studies, I went to work for a Democratic machine in South Baltimore and actually watched how people get elected, how laws are proposed and passed, and how bureaucracies work. It was, in a word, horrifying. That uneasy marriage with the Democratic Party in my mind, with those nagging inconsistencies between my opinions and the platform, quickly turned to divorce, and even while working to elect Democrats I changed my party registration to “Independent.” I still remember walking into the City Clerk’s Office, soon after moving to Manchester, and, though I had intended to register as a Republican, being almost lightheaded when answering the clerk’s question relative to my party registration. I felt, for a moment, as if I were intoxicated. The unfamiliar word left my lips in a slur and a stutter, as if I were trying to pronounce something in Russian.

The obvious question is: why? Why did I leave the party in which I was raised, the party that I had supported and worked for and helped to elect candidates? Why did I find myself swaying at the clerk’s counter, saying a foreign word?

I could no longer, in good conscience, ignore the facts that had become so evident to me over time. I had, over nearly three decades, learned to put aside the outdated party platforms and actually consider the very different philosophies behind them, and I found that without question my personal philosophy is much more in line with the Republican Party than that of the Democrats.

This, then, is why I am a Republican:

I am a Republican because I believe that each individual is born with inherent, inalienable natural rights, and that no government action may legitimately take them away. This is the same sentiment expressed in our state and federal constitutions, and in the writings of virtually every Founder of this nation. Democrats believe that rights come from governments, and as such those rights may be regulated and legislated away. In addition, Democrats believe that rights not found in nature may be legislated into existence, such as the right to housing and the right to health care. I believe that down this road lies pure socialism.

I am a Republican because I believe that these natural rights include the right to free speech, the right to engage in free trade, the right to contract, the right to control one’s property, the right to self-defense, and the right to make one’s own decisions. Motivated by their misguided good intentions, Democrats routinely work to subjugate these rights to their will. I cannot list the ways they do so. They are simply innumerable.

I am a Republican because I believe that the rights of the individual need to be protected from a tyrannous majority; indeed, that protecting individual rights is the real reason we have governments at all. Democrats believe that the individual must yield to the majority, regardless of the rights in question.

I am a Republican because I believe that the free market is dynamic, that it quickly responds to a multitude of factors, from a surprise snowstorm that hurts the orange crop to the return of bell bottoms to the latest obsession with Apple’s high-tech devices. The free market is a wonderful equation that balances supply and demand with the full range of values and preferences of every single consumer, simultaneously. I further believe that government regulation is stolid, unyielding, and oppressive, and that it harms the entry of new talent, new capital, and new ideas into the marketplace. Democrats believe that centralized economies yield more of this amorphous concept they call “social justice.” They believe this in spite of the undeniable fact that the most centralized, regulated economies in the history of the world – China, the Soviet Union, Cuba, Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, etc – have resulted in the lowest amount of social justice, human happiness, and quality of life over the past century.

I am a Republican because I believe that the ends do not justify the means. It is never acceptable to trample the rights of even one person to improve the lot of the many. Democrats place more value on the “common good,” and are willing to step on some people in pursuit of their grand vision.

I am a Republican because I believe that my business is private space, not public, and that I should be entitled to set the policies to be observed therein. Public spaces are publicly owned, as in the streets and sidewalks and parks. Democrats believe that not only are all businesses public and thus subject to intense regulation, deep down they believe that all homes are public, too, and are thus equally subject to regulation. Observe the latest push to ban smoking in apartments, condominiums, and attached dwellings.

I am a Republican because I believe that people are entitled to make their own decisions. Democrats believe that anyone not an elected Democrat is generally stupid, and need to have their decisions made for them. Democrats believe that, because their intentions are pure and yet we oppose them, that our intentions are not. They often advocate class warfare by painting us as selfish and uneducated. Thus, they believe that they are morally superior, and perhaps just a little more intelligent. Democrats tend to be elitist and condescending.

I am a Republican because I believe that people can overcome any obstacle through hard work and determination. Democrats believe that people are either helpless victims or lucky victors of their circumstances, and that citizens have no control over their destiny. I believe this view of humanity is insulting.

I am a Republican because I recognize that making mistakes and overcoming hurdles is part of growing up and maturing, and that by insulating people from their mistakes and discouraging them from tackling those hurdles we are becoming a nation of adult children, destined to never have the experiences that result in true adulthood. Democrats believe they are everyone’s parents, so it’s perfectly all right that some people never grow up.

I am a Republican because I believe in Locke’s principle, that voluntary interaction is morally superior to using force to achieve social progress.

I am a Republican because I’m happy to live my life and let my fellow citizens alone to live theirs as they see fit. Democrats aren’t happy with living their own lives, they feel the need to live the lives of others, as well.

I am a Republican because I believe that people are generally good, and that being good, people that can afford to help other people in genuine need usually will. Democrats believe that people that do not happen to be elected Democrats are very selfish, and that they must utilize the power of the state to take money away from those who earn it for redistribution to the needy using a very inefficient, wasteful, bloated bureaucracy.

I am a Republican because I have no wish to be kept, or to keep others against their will. Democrats believe they are your keeper, whether you like it or not.

I am a Republican because I believe that parents have every right to raise their children as they see fit. Democrats do not believe they are “your” children, they believe they are “our” children.

I am a Republican because I believe that people know best how to spend their money. Democrats believe that they know how to spend your money better than you do.

I am a Republican because I believe that the meanings of words do not change, just as one plus one always equals two. This means that laws, including Constitutions, mean exactly what they meant when written. Democrats believe that words do change, and that the Constitution means very different things now than it did when written in 1787. Republicans believe this approach to be very dangerous, because if the meanings of words are dynamic and not static, then the words themselves are meaningless; like a modern art painting, the meaning is solely in the eye of the beholder. This is why so many lawyers are Democrats: they believe they are uniquely qualified to be shapers and artists of the law.

I am a Republican because I believe in liberty. Democrats believe that liberty must yield upon the demand of 50.1% of a given geopolitical unit.

I am a Republican because if someone shoots at me but misses, I'm either going to be shooting back or cursing myself for not wearing a firearm that day. Democrats would reach for a cell phone and call the police, hoping the police cars somehow reach them before the next bullet.

I am a Republican because I believe that local government is better government, because one is more likely to know the decision-makers by name, or more likely to run into them at the grocery store, and thus be able to influence the decisions, when those decisions are being made locally. Democrats believe that decisions made further away are somehow better. Thus, they support moving power from the cities to the state capital, from the state capital to Washington DC, and even from Washington DC to non-state entities such as the United Nations or The Hague.

I am a Republican because I believe in the right to be left alone. Democrats believe in the right to impose. My philosophy requires no sacrifice from anyone against his will. The philosophy of Democrats is built upon unwilling sacrifice.

I am a Republican because I believe taxes should be as low as possible and that government should focus on performing a limited number of essential tasks, most of which have to do with public safety. Democrats believe that the government should be funding all manner of programs designed to accomplish innumerable goals, from running a network of radio stations to funding artists to fighting marijuana use to encouraging healthier eating.

I am a Republican because I believe in the dignity of the individual. Democrats do not; rather, they believe in the supremacy of the collective.

I am a Republican because I believe that affirmative action is racism, and racism is wrong regardless of whether the victim is white or black. Also, I believe that people should be judged on their merits as individuals, based on their talents and intelligence and character, and should never receive special treatment because of their race, gender, or sexual orientation. Democrats believe that people of certain races, a certain gender, and a certain sexual orientation deserve preferential treatment to make up for past discrimination. This leads to…

I am a Republican because I believe that generations do not leave legacies of guilt behind. My great-grandfather was a racist, but that does not obligate me to anything, nor is a cause for me to feel guilt. I am not a racist, and that’s all that should matter. Democrats speak of inherited guilt, as if people bear some measure of guilt for their forefathers’ misdeeds.

I am a Republican because I recognize that a perfect world is impossible, that life sometimes isn’t fair, and that obstacles, fair or unfair, must be overcome through persistence and hard work. Democrats believe that a Utopia is possible, free of suffering and full of happiness and fairness, and that it can be legislated into existence by the use of their superior intellect and wise beneficence.

I am a Republican because I believe that opinions and decisions should be based upon thoughtful reasoning, weighing of the evidence, and the use of logic. Democrats believe that opinions and decisions should be based upon emotional appeals that tug on the heartstrings, regardless of how illogical those arguments may be.

I am a Republican because I believe in smaller, less intrusive government. Democrats believe in larger, more intrusive government.

I will anticipate some objections. As is always the case when dealing with loose organizations containing literally tens of millions of people, this list is full of dramatic generalizations. To be a bit more specific:

There are two kinds of Republicans with whom I find myself disagreeing often: the evangelicals and the RINOs. The evangelical Republicans do not share my “right-to-be-left-alone” beliefs. They, like the Democrats, are perfectly happy to use the power of government to shape society; they simply have different priorities and want society shaped towards a different kind of Utopian vision. Thus, like Democrats, they argue for restrictions on the right to contract (advocating state interference in marriage) and state funding of worthy causes (funding of religious charities). Make no mistake, the Bush Presidency has been an evangelical one, with its war on Islam and its big-government pseudo-conservatism. Happily, the stranglehold these evangelicals have held upon the GOP for the past decade seems to be slipping. There will be some growing pains, such as the disastrous election of 2006 and mixed results nationally this year, but the party will emerge the stronger and better for it, because we will have regained the Goldwater-Reagan small-government classical liberal conservatism that defined the winning GOP for forty years.

RINOs are Republicans-in-name-only, people who support Democrat policies and beliefs, but who register as Republican for electoral success or due to a lack of understanding of the party philosophy. I cringe whenever a registered Republican votes to expand state power or centralize it, weakening local decision-making. Republicans who do it often should truly consider a change in party, because by their incorrect, inconsistent votes they make it appear that we stand for nothing at all, or worse, that we are Democrat-lite. There are some DINOs – I know several – but they are much rarer than RINOs. I believe this disparity is due to the fact that Democrats tend to be followers, and so they fall in line and vote as they are told much easier than Republicans. The local Democrat chair calls the delegation and tells them to support or oppose a given bill, and they usually say, “Yes, sir!” The Republican chair rarely bothers to make that call, because he knows that if he did the answer would usually be “Go to hell!”

For a mathematical explanation of why I am a Republican, I direct you to the nonpartisan New Hampshire Liberty Alliance’s “Liberty Ratings.” In 2007, only one of the top 25 House members was a Democrat, one of the rare DINOs I referenced earlier. In comparison, all of the bottom 25 House members were Democrats. With few exceptions, the Republicans scored much higher than Democrats in terms of voting to protect us from an overreaching, intrusive, expensive state government. Clearly, the Republican Party is a more dependable caretaker of freedom and individual choice.

http://www.nhliberty.org/2007_liberty_rating

As to my mother, she recently opened a small business, a deli and country store. Last month, the woman who has for my entire life cursed Republicans as selfish and held up Democrats as fine examples of generosity and intelligence, after fifty-six years as a Democrat, after five years of giving me books by Daniel Moynihan and George Mitchell in attempt to bring me back to the fold, she recently walked into her city clerk’s office in Cumberland, Maryland, and said a word that I’m sure made her head spin.

“Independent.”

Posted on Friday, April 4, 2008 at 05:44PM by Registered CommenterKeith Murphy in , | Comments26 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (26)

My gosh, Keith, an interesting entry. As I started reading I was about to take the words from your "I am a Republican because..." and make the case that those are Democratic principles as well.

As I look at all of them all, though, on just about each the case can be made that those are where the Democrats are standing, and you're welcomed home.

We want to see government stay out of our business, out of our lives, certainly out of our bedroom, and not tell us how to think.

We just want to make sure that others are not going to be able to rip us off (that's why we're for some kind of minimum wage), won't steal from us (that's why we know the Ken Lays of the world are out there so we need some regulations), and won't kill us (that's why we want a smart "war on terrorism," we want us out of Iraq, we don't want to "bomb bomb Iran," and that's why we're tough on crime.

So, Keith, come home to the Democratic Party. We'll keep the lights on for you.
April 5, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterJim Splaine
Keith,

First off, I want readers to know that we know each other and I've enjoyed our brief chats. I don't want my comments to sound offensive, because they aren't meant to be.

But good grief. I'm a Democrat. You've attributed literally dozens of asumptions about me as a Democrat that are way off base.

It really sounds like you are working off some personal resentment with your psychological profiling arguments.

Generalizing about ANY group of people in this way is bound to be innacurate and borders on political bigotry.

I much prefer to argue the role of government to summing up the pathology of millions of party members.

When I think of Republicans I think largely of two groups. I've always written glowingly about the old style mainstreet Republicans in our towns and public offices.

On the other hand, I don't have much good will towards the authoritarian types like Dick Chaney, Karl Rove and our own ex gov Craig Benson. Anyone who thinks this crowd is standing up for the rights of individuals is pretty naive in my humble opinion.



April 5, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterChaz Proulx
Mr. Splaine,

Leaving the party was a tough decision for me, and one I did not make lightly. My reasons for doing so derived from intense differences with the underlying party philosophy, differences I attempted to elucidate with my essay. The democrats the ones pushing for infringements on all those natural rights I mentioned. The bills proposing taxes on trade and labor - bills that to me are clear attacks on natural rights, are all proposed by democrats.

The roll call votes on these bills show a clear party division, and I'm on the side that says no to taxes and no to more intrusive government. Even on those issues I generally believe the Democrats to be correct on, such as REAL ID, there was significant crossover support from the Republicans in Concord.

Thank you, Mr. Splaine, but you can turn the porch light off, for now. For me to return to the Democratic Party, it would have to once again be the party of true liberalism, as it hasn't been since the days of Woodrow Wilson. I don't see such a huge shift in party sentiment ocurring anytime soon.
April 5, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterKeith M.
Hi Chaz,

I also never meant for my comments to come across as offensive. I admitted in the body of the post that it was, by necessity, filled with rank generalizations by virtue of the fact that these are organizations with tens of millions of people. I do not believe that pointing out obvious trends among a group of a hundred million people makes one a bigot, in any sense of the word.

Also, I do not believe these comments are usually true of the Democratic rank and file, who are generally honest, hardworking people and most of whom disagree with a great deal of their party platform and policies. I do believe them to be true of most of the party leadership and of certain opinion-shaping extra-party sources, including numerous bloggers such as the Daily Kos and Democratic columnists such as Ellen Goodman and Dan Rodricks. I can point to specific examples if you would like to see them.

Keep in mind, Chaz, that I was one of these people. I spent a lot of time with them. I know what they think and I know how their minds work. They really do believe in legislating a better world through an activist government. They really do make cracks about Republicans being selfish and/or stupid, about them caring more about business profits than working people.

And then one day I realized that Republicans are working people, too, and that it was very unlikely that Republicans are a group of evil, mean people. I do not doubt the motives of my democratic friends, though they doubt mine; indeed, they have the best of intentions. But the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

I have no personal resentment. Indeed, I am at peace with where I am in my life and in my political home.

I share your view of Karl Rove and Dick Cheney, though perhaps I'm not quite as harsh about it. I think both parties have their share of down-and-dirty political operatives, and that Mark Penn and Karl Rove are probably two sides of the same coin.

Yes, I do believe that Craig Benson did a decent job of standing up for individuals. He supported the individual right to carry firearms by signing numerous pieces of legislation. He vetoed a budget that was too big, a budget supported by many RINOs, and forced the state to live within its means. In so doing, he staved off calls for an income or sales tax, protecting the right of individuals to keep the money they earn through labor and the right to trade freely.

I wish we had his leadership now. I know you will not agree with me on this.
April 5, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterKeith M.
Keith

On a personal level I know you are fair minded. I'm a decent judge of character and think your a straight shooter.

In defense of Dems who make cracks about Republicans and greed, I am guilty of doing that myself. But as you said, most Republicans and most Dems too are just hard working people trying to make a decent life for themselves. So I limit my attacks to the worst offenders and NEVER to rank and file republicans.

I just left a town meeting with Carol Shea Porter in Epping. Dems and Republicans were there and its amazing what a civil conversation you can have with most people if you show a little respect.

Carol always stresses that Americans are a good people. I agree with her. We are by and large a very decent people.

Unfortunately some very bad apples have amassed far more power than they deserve.

There are a lot of people and organizations who inject huge amounts of money into the public sphere with one motivation--to pad their own pockets. There are also predatory corporations driven by nothing but the profit motive. Many of them as we are now seeing, take the money and run leaving the decent folks who work for them in dire straights.

Pensions are disappearing and shell companies are used to avoid taxes. Oil companies are gouging and Halliburton has cost us billions in Iraq.

But these were the big doners who supported Bush Cheney.

The markets have failed big time recently. Investment banks were not regulated and left to their own devices have screwed up our economy so badly that taxpayers are being blackmailed into bailing them out.

The argument is that wall Street might collapse if we don't prop up what's left of Bear Stearns one of the most predatory and oportunistic (-sp)companies in Lower Manhatten.



That's the result of greed.

April 5, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterChaz Proulx
oops

Keith.

you're right, we're not going to agree about Governor Benson. Not my favorite guy. He wasn't a favorite of many Republicans either. Heavy hitters like Betty (or is it Nancy?) Tamposi supported John Lynch. Otherwise Lynch would have lost. The winning margin was only one percent and on election night, Republicans for Lynch were in the room when the final results came in at 2:30 in the morning.

Benson made a lot of enemies by not even trying to work with the legislature. He also did a lot of grandstanding--some of it showing up fellow Republicans. He was hooked up with Grover Norquist and main street Republicans saw through Norquist with ease. He showed up here and was NOT well received.

Republican Senator Dick Green called Benson a "cancer on the system" Green also had a run in with Norquist in the legislative office building.

There was a lot more going on in the Benson administration than meets the eye.
April 5, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterChaz Proulx
Chaz,

Thank you for the compliment. I always value the civility of our discourse, and despite our disagreements about the role of government, the classical question of less vs. more, I know you are motivated by improvement of our nation and state, just as I am.

I believe that what we are seeing should, by rights, be a very temporary market correction of the sort that comes along every decade or so. I also believe that "stimulus packages," like the ones passed by Congress and urged by the President, as well as taxpayer bailouts, will only make things worse by increasing the deficit and spending money the nation does not have.

My approach towards corporate bailouts and tax breaks is the same as it is towards individuals: they shouldn't exist. It is just as wrong to give special consideration to businesses as it is to Joe and Jane Six-Pack. Everyone should play by the same rules. You'll never see me argue for special benefits for some.

Bear Stearns deserves to go under. I say let it go.

I agree with Benson's general philosophy and much of his actual decisions. His problem was that he was not very politic; he promised to run the state government like a business, and he did - to an extreme degree. In my business, what I say goes. I don't take a poll of my employees or managers, nor do I take a lot of guff from employees who don't do their job correctly. Benson didn't understand that as the state's CEO he had to be diplomatic, especially with other Republicans in leadership, and that un-politic approach is what cost him the election. In my opinion, that election was more about his somewhat abrasive personality, and not necessarily an indictment of his ideas and policies.

Remember when he set up that "Tax Me More" fund, and told citizens that wanted a tax increase to just drop their checks in the mail? The fund got like $200 total. Man, that was priceless. And I'll never forget that huge veto stamp...

Anyway, good chat, Chaz. Stop in the Taproom soon and we'll debate over a round of beers.
April 5, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterKeith M.
Keith,

The Tax me more ploy was a Norquist idea. Benson put it on the state website where it didn't belong. He never could separate politics from public policy.

As for Bear Stearns, bailing them out sets a dangerous precedent. I share your sentiment to let em go under.

But from everything I've read about this situation, the argument for the bailout is that there is a very real chance of a general run on the market that could even result in a depression. This is based on psychology more than liquidity, but is a plausible scenario,

So that's why I argued earlier that Bear Stearns has essentially blackmailed taxpayers,

Also according to Paul Krugman and the economists I believe know what they are talking about this isn't just a minor market adjustment. With Bush's national debt, the war (which is off the books by the way), millions of home owners upside down on their mortgages and housing prices going down down down, plus the credit card debt carried by the average American--this crise is a big one.

In other words the chickens have come home to roost.

The US had very little national debt until Reagan. Clinton controlled it and then it exploded again under GWB.

As Howard Dean used to say you can't trust Republicans with your money. They talk about small government and reduce taxes on the wealthy, but when the stuff hits the fan its all those working class Dems and Republicans who get it in the neck every time.

Actually Paul Krugman predicted this scenario about two years ago. I read him religiously and his ability to see clearly into the future, is why he is considered one of a handfull of truly world class economists.
April 6, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterChaz Proulx
oops

I promise to drop in to Murphy's soon.

April 6, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterChaz Proulx
Keith; that is one of the most cogent best written posts I have ever read anywhere. It was obviously done with a lot of thought, passion and without compromise to yourself or your integrity. You are, without question superior in your thought process and intellect and I agree we must live with the growing pains, lose for now, but in the end, the real people will see the light and what this country needs to be once again. You have the incredible natural ability of a leader. Your writing should be the republican party's platform. I would like you to bring me a copy or email it to me so I can read it on my show. Great job. Joe Kelly
April 6, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterjoekelly
Well done, Keith!

> ... I believe that local government is better government...

Local government is not always better than the larger forms (see Windsor). It is just easier to escape if local government becomes unacceptable. This fosters competition between towns, improving the average quality. There will undoubtedly still be higher highs and lower lows.
April 6, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDan McGuire
"We want to see government stay out of our business, out of our lives, certainly out of our bedroom, and not tell us how to think." - Jim Splaine

Jim, if I didn't think you honestly believe this I'd say you are out right lying, however I do believe you think you're stating the truth here. The NH Liberty Alliance looks over bills every year and rates state reps based on how intrusive the bills are to our individual freedoms and lives and how each rep votes on that bill. Republicans time and time again come out on the top of the ratings while democrats (yourself included) come out on the bottom. I recall you remarked at least once when I've pointed to this that you are very proud of your F rating with that group.

How on earth can you be proud of an F rating with the liberty alliance and still feel you support government staying out of our lives?

Perfect example was your vote on CACR16 bill to create an income or sales tax to which you voted 'yea'. Income tax and sales tax equals MORE government, not less.
April 7, 2008 | Registered CommenterRichard Barnes
"I promise to drop in to Murphy's soon." - Chaz

Chaz, you let me know when you're going and the first round is on me.
April 7, 2008 | Registered CommenterRichard Barnes
"The US had very little national debt until Reagan. Clinton controlled it and then it exploded again under GWB. "

Chaz, there are groups now that show who's voting for spending and who's voting to curb spending. The National Taxpayers Union is one such group (www.ntu.org). Sure there are plenty of big spender republicans but far more republicans top that list then democrats.

And of the three current contenders for president McCain is the only one scoring in the top 25 coming in in 11th place scoring 78% (sad that 11th place is only 78%). Hillary comes out near bottom with only 9%. Obama scores even worse with only 6%. So none of them are going to keep government spending down as much as one would like.
April 7, 2008 | Registered CommenterRichard Barnes
Richard

Are you aware that the Iraq war is not included in the federal budget.

So your guy McCain is supporting addition trillion dollars of tax money that isn't even accounted for

Typical Republican flim flamery and you still fall for it every time
April 7, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterChaz Proulx
The problem with all humans is that they assume that what is good for them is good for everybody. They also assume that people who haven't tried what they are advocating are in need of education... or just too stupid to talk to.

I think Democrats are naturally a bunch of individuals that spend the rest of their life advocating for community. And Republicans are naturally a community that spend the rest of their life championing the role of the individual.
April 7, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterH
Did this blog remind anyone else of the Joni Mitchell song: Both Sides Now?

'Cause now I've got that stuck in my head.
April 7, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterH
I'm an independent and proud of it. Blowing off both major parties was a very easy decision for me.

Democrat party principles, Mr. Splaine? The Democratic party hasn't got any principles beyond: say anything to get elected.

My problem with the Republicans is they seems way too much like Democrats sometimes.
April 7, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterRowland
Do you really believe the modern day GOP represents your platform?

No, I didn't think so.

Keith, you are a libertarian NOT a budget busting, rights invading, big government Bushie.
April 7, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterManchvoter
Manchvoter,

The GOP has, since the classical liberals fled the Democratic Party between 1932 and 1960, been an uneasy coalition of classical liberals and evangelical social conservatives. Just as the Democratic Party has become an uneasy coalition of unions and minorities.

From the rise of Taft and Goldwater to the end of the Reagan years, the GOP did indeed represent this libertarian philosophy, and at the grassroots level it still does. There are still many even in the federal level who still believe in these principles. Check out Jeff Flake out of Arizona. Read up on Mark Sanford, Governor of South Carolina. You'll find they've got a lot more in common with Goldwater than they do with Bush.

And the Bush presidency comes to an end in nine months. The grassroots is already moving to take our party back from the evangelicals who've driven it onto the rocks.

Thank you for recognizing that I'm not very similar to George Bush in my political philosophy. That doesn't mean I'm not a Republican, though -- if anything, in my opinion, it means that he never was. His rhetoric was very Republican, and he ran on our platform, but his actions once elected proved to be completely different. He never ONCE vetoed a spending bill, not until the SCHIP thing came up. Not ONCE! That kind of fiscal irresponsibility is just disgusting. I don't give people a free pass just because they have an R next to their name.

Remember that Goldwater said that Falwell deserved "a swift kick in the ass," and you'll understand the roots of this party division. I think the GOP will suture our division before the Democrats will fix theirs, though. Holy cow, what a mess they've got on their hands! Talk about stealing defeat from the jaws of victory!

If I were in the GOP leadership I would start printing letters right now: Dear Democratic Woman: By creating a system of Byzantine party rules and nominating Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton, your party has left you behind. Please feel free to consider the GOP your new home. After all, the GOP was the driving force behind women's sufferage...
April 7, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterKeith M.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.