Your DNC or WH talking points were annoying and insulting. The smirk on your face as one caller spoke of the reporting of Fox News on Benghazi issues betrayed your patronizing attitude and your ignorance about that matter. Then your mindless spewing of the Dem. talking points on "insuring that the perps are brought to justice blah,blah,blah" I've heard them many times from parties who are politically motivated to help the Pres. stonewall and further attempt to 'cool the mark' until after Nov. 6.
The REAL ISSUE is, and the concern of many VOTERS is, THE FAILURE TO RESPOND TO THE AMBASSADOR'S MULTIPLE PLEAS FOR MORE SECURITY; and THE PRESIDENT, UN AMB RICE,& H.Clinton's obviously FALSE accounts of the cause of the attack and murders. There is delay and cover-up of matters regarding weapons & al quaida or al quaida affiliated TERRORISTS. I need answers to these questions BEFORE I VOTE FOR MY NEXT COMMANDER IN CHIEF. To date, his (and that of HIS press) failure to respond to these serious concerns appears more akin to that of a CON than of a Commander-in-Chief.
Secondly, in what appears to be becoming a "state-controlled press" (!) that is refusing to cover this matter, you might take your own advice to the Fox News watching caller to view some different news sources. You stated that you don't watch Fox. Perhaps you also would benefit from viewing some different news sources -- such as Fox News. Do you know that Fox has 2 different types of programming ? There are 1)Opinion Commentator programs that are DIFFERENT & DISTINCT from the 2)Straight News programs. Even the Washington Post has commended the investigative work of the Fox news reporter on these Benghazi matters. If you were to view Fox occasionally, perhaps you would have more to offer than Dem talking points. I, personally, am usually insulted by talking points. Do the parties WANT to dumb down the public discourse? And do the Dems target below average intelligence voters?
Thank you for considering these concerns.