Advertising

 

 


 

 

« NHInsider Readers say NO TAX on Ice Storms! | Main | Correction - NHI readers say McCain Wins Debate Decisively »
Monday
Oct062008

NHI Readers Choose Palin as Debate Victor

Here are the results with the automated voting removed, it is easy to tell which is being generated by an automated voting system. When we get 5-6 entries per minute for a period of time, then it settles back to normal NHI visitor rates. When these two time periods are removed these are the final results. I heard that Obama has been  affiliated with ACORN the non profit under investigation for voter fraud, now it is becoming clear that Voter Fraud will be rampant this election cycle.

Rank Gov. Palin's Debate Performance
    Ratio
Excellent, a Home Run! 53%
Great, Double Off the Wall! 21%
Ok, Got on Base 6%
Bad, Infield Fly! 7%
Horrible, Struck Out Looking! 12%

Reader Comments (9)

Last night home run and struck out were tied. Nothing surprising about that kind of manipulation!
October 6, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterpinko
Pinko,

The IP spoofer is a cleaver tool but failed to account for one important fact. NHI is a compilation of a few websites and not one dedicated website.

The number of unique IP visitors to NHI main page should always be equal to or more than the number of votes since the only way to vote is to come to NHI Main Page which registers a hit, then vote.

But the spoofer, sat on NHI, ran his IP spoofer and voted over and over again until they achieved the results they wanted. But to us it was an obvious subversion since the number of votes on the polling website exceeded the number of visitors to NHI during that time period!

Bob DeMaura
NHInsider owner/operator
October 6, 2008 | Registered CommenterNH INSIDER
Dear Bob,

If memory serves me correctly in recalling the data I saw this morning, even if you were to keep the allegedly automated voting tallies, the fact remains that the poll was not a clear either/or, and thus the data clearly pointed toward Ms. Palin's favor. If one takes the first three categories -- all of which are favorable to Gov. Palin, by the way -- that total was easliy greater than the two negatives combined. Am I right? It seems that those connivers who would sincerely try to manipulate the math against the esteemed governor are not particularly adroit. Oh, well.

But if the only outcome of this poll is that it led to Pinko feeling, well, miffed, I think it worth doing again and again.

Peace,

BG
October 6, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterBill Gnade
Bob, you should have included the link to what you were talking about...

http://www.nhinsider.com/nhi-polling/2008/10/1/correction-nhi-readers-say-mccain-wins-debate-decisively.html

When I first read your comment I didn't fully understand it.
October 6, 2008 | Registered CommenterRick Barnes
There was no spoofer. There were links to the poll on a couple of Dem web sites. Mr. DeMaura didn't get the result he wanted, so he's blaming a nonexistent villain.
October 7, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSome guy on the net
Dear some Guy ..

The suspicious votes all occurred during very short time periods... If this were coming from links on other websites then the votes would have been spread out throughout the entire voting period. It wasn't they all occurred in a 1 hour period then it stopped.

The pattern was there on the McCain/Obama Poll and twice on the Palin/Biden Poll.

Are you trying to say they only had the links up for 1 hour?

Bob DeMaura
October 8, 2008 | Registered CommenterNH INSIDER
She hit homerun? In what reality did that happen?

All this poll proves is how skewed NH Insiders readership is.
October 8, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMike Marsh
MM - Doesn't that make the most sense?
The votes should reflect the readers of the website...

Having a person from somewhere on the net sit here and 'Stuff the Ballot box' isn't a very good poll.

I assume BlueNH poll would be overwhelmingly in the Democrat column... If they suddenly received hundreds of votes for the Republicans in a very short period of time wouldn't they be suspicious ... Knowing the history of BlueNH they would fix the problem ie: remove the suspicious votes and then they would start looking to see if they could out the person ...

we didn't bother with the outing part since we have a pact with our readers that we do not 'out' people!

Bob DeMaura
October 9, 2008 | Registered CommenterNH INSIDER
Mike Moonbat must be using the internet poll cypherin he employed to bust the NH budget and put us $300 million in the hole.

One a moonbat always a moonbat.
October 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterEd Naile
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.