Monday
Jan262009
NHI Readers want full Name Disclosure For Discussions
Monday, January 26, 2009 at 07:14AM | Would you participate in discussions if full name disclosure is required? | |||
| Ratio | |||
| Yes, and I'd pay a members fee! | 20% | ||
| Yes, If it were free! | 52% | ||
| No, Absolutely not! | 28% | ||
NH INSIDER | Comments Off | 

Reader Comments (13)
I was never anonymous but I thought about it. I can understand why people would want to be anonymous. I guess they should settle for being armed.
I haven't had death threats myself just some angry and incoherent phone calls.
It would be nice to think that we all have enough in common that we could still sit down and have a beer (or whatever) and talk about all the other things that happen in the world besides politics.
Of course there are always exceptions. So yes, I exercise my 2nd amendment right to self protection. Just in case.
No. I am opposed.
Liberals would never say as much dumb stuff unless it was anon. (except Mike Moonbat) I need the free material.
Keep the anonomice as they are.
We're coming out of a Republican era that has almost destroyed the country; maybe you're not quite as smart as you think.
Just work the common sense issues that everyone can agree on and lose the smart-ass anti Dem comments. You'll get more done that way, especially since we Dems are taking over...
As far as the republican era almost destroying the country, there is plenty of blame to go around. Our democratic led Congress has made a mess of everything. Can we all say recession and foreclosures led by Freddie Mac and Fanny May. Our democratic Legislature has made a mess here too. Money committee chairmen that couldn’t run a lemonade stand if you gave them the lemons and the stand, gave us rosy revenue projections so that they could spend, spend spend. Add to that a deficit budget even though they were warned that the economy was tanking. What does Speaker Norelli do? She puts the same people back as chairmen. Stay tuned for the Destruction of New Hampshire as we know it Part II.
As far as the topic of full name disclosure, It should be by choice, but the real credibility lies with those unafraid to put their money where their mouth is, or in this case your name behind what you say.
Cliff Newton
Look at all the states that are in dire need of bailouts.Nearly all of them are run by?,you guessed it,Dems.This is even more outrageous when you look back and see that Democrats have been badmouthing the economy for years now and yet Governments across the country have only grown.Why is that?
You sound so much like Ray today.
Remember Rabo, I'm a registered Democrat.
We know you need the free material. Let's face it...when you cut through all your BS, you really don't add too much the dialogue here and most of what you say is only a rehash from Rush or Howie.
Robert Tarr
Frankly,the first episode of "When Harry met Nancy" left me a bit short on feelings of bi-partisanship, so it may be a while before I am willing to embrace the "I'd like to buy the world a coke" pandering that has emerged miraculously from the nest of harpies-- previously known as the 110th Congress--the momment their guy gets elected to the OVal office.
Lets just call it Change I can't beleive in.
And how does it help to post a FatFaceBook Page under someone else's old email address?
You know what I'm talking about, right?
So now I am starting my own web site dedicated to some issues you may be interested in.
Keep reading.