Advertising

 

 


 

 

« Who will be the next Chairman of the NH GOP? | Main | NHI Readers Against Special Rights for the Transgendered »
Monday
May042009

NHI Readers Against Radical Liberal Agenda, Direction of Debate Clear

2013 - Do you Support Multi-Partner Marriage? (Polygamy, Sharia Law)
    Ratio
Yes, All Should Benefit From Marriage 36%
No, One wife/husband is enough! 64%

 

Though the majority is still against the radical agenda, the direction of the future debate is clear!

We will be discussing the religious preferences for multiple partners from the Muslims and Mormons. The Gays will have to support the changes or they are truly hypocritical.

Reader Comments (7)

I find it interesting that multi partner marriage received more in favor of it then the "bathroom" bill did in its poll.
May 5, 2009 | Registered CommenterRick Barnes
Richard,

I thought it was a great poll. Enlightening. Makes a definite point. We don't all need to agree all the time, right?
May 5, 2009 | Registered CommenterDave Jarvis
Legalize gay marriage.
And then legalize medical marijuana.
Live free or die. Common sense for all.
Simple.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCyAwqUAdUE
May 7, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterdebbie jones
Dave, I'm not saying I agree or disagree with either issue. I'm only pointing out that far more people supported multi-partner marriage then supported allowing trans-gendered from using the bathroom of their choice vs which on matches their own plumbing.
May 8, 2009 | Registered CommenterRick Barnes
Richard,

Yeah, there may have been some statistical anomalies, but sometimes even I think it's best to clam up and just try to get along. This is one of those moments.
May 8, 2009 | Registered CommenterDave Jarvis
In order to be equal what is the solution for bisexuals? Do they get to marry a male and female? Where does this end?
May 8, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterNH Lady
NHLady: "In order to be equal what is the solution for bisexuals? Do they get to marry a male and female?"

They get to marry hermaphrodites.
May 11, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRowland
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.