The Urine Test
by Anonymous
Like alot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.
In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test with which I have no problem.
What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them?
Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their butts, doing drugs, while I work. . . .
Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check?

Reader Comments (6)
As long as you receive a paycheck from somebody, it's their call. If you don't want the paycheck, that's fine with me. If you want to toke and snort, go into business for yourself. Just put a postit on you forehead that says "User." And the high risk job argument is BS. What about food preparers, people stocking high store shelves, driving fork lifts, using electrical devices, day care centers, handling my credit card, etc. etc.? And don't tell me that you reserve your coke for weekends and off days only. I don't believe you.
1) Smoking a joint shouldn't be illegal in the first place. However employers can and should be able to set whatever policy they wish on your employment. If they want to test your breath for alcohol that too should be something can should have the right to do.
2) Welfare should be abolished. Others should not have any right to what someone takes home unless that person wishes to give it to help them. This is NOT the same as unemployment as those who work pay into unemployment so if they lose their jobs it is their own money they are getting back. Someone collecting welfare however is not paying in... they are simply collecting.