SHARING THE WEALTH
By Peter Bearse
MAY DAY! MAY DAY! – The call of people in distress; also, the name of May 1st, traditionally more of a “Labor Day” than the one in September.
These days, “distress” and “labor” go together. Workers’ work is earning far, far less, either in real terms [their inflation-adjusted earnings have declined] or as a share of earned incomes [in an economy in which the share of the rich has risen by leaps and bounds]. Thus, rising inequality is a sleeper (read between the lines) issue of this 2008 political year, to become a time bomb of an issue if we don’t start to do something about it now.
What’s to be done? First, try to get to the root of the problem. One fundamental source is that garden-variety wage and salary workers aren’t receiving shares of the profits and other wealth that their work helps to produce. Some firms have profit-sharing plans. Others have “ESOPs” – Employee Stock Ownership Plans. The latter are preferable since shares of stock embrace all company assets, not just profits. Several studies have shown that companies with ESOPs perform better than those without.
Another source is that, while paying through the nose as gas prices rise, American workers are not receiving any shares of the considerable profits being accumulated by “Big Oil” from our nation’s (diminishing) natural resource of oil, nor from any other natural resources whose prices are also rising in the commodities markets. The exception is Alaska, whose citizens receive an annual check from the Alaska Permanent Fund, derived from oil revenues produced in the state.
A third source is the negative rate of return on the forced savings that American workers contribute to Social Security for their own retirement.
Anybody seriously concerned with the ability of American workers to earn “living wages” that can support families will do more than claim an increase in the minimum wage as a major accomplishment. The evidence shows that it “helps” no more than a small minority of the nation’s workforce and leads to a loss of entry-level jobs. The next Congress will need to do much more. A good start would be threefold:
(1) In light of a generation of experience, liberalize and improve laws to encourage and enable the spread of employee stock ownership.
(2) Allow more oil drilling on public lands and increase lease rates and royalties that oil companies would have to pay for the privilege. [At the state level, states with considerable natural resources should look at the Alaskan model.]
(3) Require that workers’ Social Security funds are invested to earn a significantly positive rate of return – by putting the funds into a true, secure trust fund in the form of a public/private partnership that would invest them in a broad spectrum of American enterprise. This would negate the need to raise the already high rate of FICA taxation to maintain Social Security.
The bylines of these suggestions are: “Everyman an entrepreneur!” by broadening the base of ownership, “Spread the Wealth!” and “Let’s hear it for the American worker!”
Yet, these points are but a partial beginning of an effort to deal with a long-run, fundamental issue. Let’s get a discussion going. Comments? Other suggestions? Reply to peterj@peterbearseforcongress.com.
Peter Bearse, Ph.D., International Consulting Economist, author of Mobilizing Capital & Services: The New Economy (co-author), and Candidate for Congress, NH CD #1. Released by Supporters of Peter Bearse for Congress on May 1, 2008.

Reader Comments (5)
G Rowland, from your campaign staff just left this quote under my column:
The claims he makes are sickening and would probably stand up as libel in a court of law. But most importantly they don't reflect well on you. His last line is in direct reference to you. I'll give you a call about this so neither one of us has to be embarassed further. I just called Rowland too, but he's out.
"Hey Chaz I've got a challenge for you. It's an open secret you're in love with Carol Shea-Porter. The way you savage anyone who dares offer a credible threat to Carol's power is both touching and revealing. Why not come out of the closet and tell us what you love most about this adorable little totalitarian schoolmarm?
Signed, Rowland.
P.S. You know Bradley's too much of a mook to be a serious threat to the Che-Porter regime. Stephen clearly has you spooked. But I know somebody else I hope will make her quake in her boots.
May 2, 2008 | Rowland
Go ahead and ban me from your blog if it makes you feel better. It will also make you look petty.
For the record I would never ban you from nhcitizen.org. My attitude toward people who behave as you do is to give them enough rope to hang themselves with.
I'm speaking only for myself. I hope that when you said those very rude things to me on the phone that you were speaking only for yourself. If Carol had a better reputation you'd be n embarrassment to her.
You wouldn't tell me what you were talking about. I'm guessing it's the post above. Could it be you have no notion of a figure of speech? Or no sense of humor? Or is it both?
If you throw this lawyer intimidation at me any more I will appeal to the court of public opinion. And in that court you will look like a complete jackass.
I've never blocked anyone at my blog. As you know--because you handed the phone to him--Peter and I have discussed this and will clear it up over the weekend.
If anyone in any campaign I was involved in did what you are doing they would get one chance and one only.
Bad actors are a liability to political campaigns.
Now poor Peter has to decide what to do. I have nothing at all against him and we seem to have a rapor. Plus I'm his neighbor and yours too.
Peter and I will take care of this. I have nothing left to say to you.
Some of this, I am sorry to say, smacks of the Hatfield and McCoys. An outsider looking in at NH Insider might very well want to remain an outsider. I guess what I am saying is that some of this stuff might best be left off the pages of this site.
Do what you must, of course. I am not suggesting censorship or any other draconian measures. I'm just an outsider who is learning to be an insider.
Be well all, and keep fighting the good fight!
Bill Gnade
______________________________________
P.S. to Chaz: I tried to call you this weekend and tried to leave a message but we did not seem to have a good connection. You can reach me at 603-819-1408 (cell phone devoted to the campaign).