Advertising

 

 


 

 

« Andrew Hemingway: We need more Freshmen Republicans | Main | Cory R. Lewandowski - Legislative Session Ends: The Good, the Bad and the Unresolved »
Friday
Jul082011

Carol Shea-Porter - What’s Really Behind Debt-Ceiling Politics

The debt limit debate has become a sign of all that is wrong in Congress these days. This Congress, the most partisan in recent history and, as the LA Times notes, “underperforming even the ‘do-nothing Congress’ of 1948,” simply cannot stay at work long enough or even work together to get the job done.  As NH Senator Kelly Ayotte commented in that July 3 article, “I thought we would vote on a lot more bills.”  Yes, so did we.  At least, we thought they could vote on the looming debt ceiling vote before our country defaulted, but the deadline, August 2, is getting too close for comfort, and Congress had to be shamed into coming back to work this week to even argue about it. They have not passed a single jobs bill, which is a disaster for the millions of unemployed in this country, but if they let America default on its debts, the consequences would reverberate in the markets around the world.

 As Ronald Reagan said in 1983, “the full consequences of a default, or even the serious prospect of default by the United States, are impossible and awesome to contemplate.” In 1987, Reagan called refusing to raise the debt ceiling “brinksmanship” that ”threatens the holders of government bonds and those who rely on Social Security and veterans benefits.  Interest rates would skyrocket, instability would occur in financial markets, and the Federal deficit would soar.”  

Fast-forward to today.  In Atlanta Business Chronicle, US Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donahue said:  “…the country cannot afford to not pay its bills. To those newly-elected representatives who say they aren’t going to raise the debt ceiling and will shut down government, Donahue said the U.S. Chamber has its own message: We’ll get rid of you.”  This is pretty serious stuff.  When Republican icons from the past and the head of the US Chamber are warning Republican leaders of dire consequences if they don’t raise the debt ceiling and default, why isn’t Congress listening?

Sadly, the answer lies in politics.  Political ideology trumps reality.  Republicans are so against any kind of tax on the wealthy that they voted repeatedly to increase the ceiling through the Bush years rather than raise revenue to pay for their spending.  As USA Today stated in their July 5 editorial,  “…the nation has used trillions of dollars in borrowed money to finance two wars, Medicare’s prescription drug program, and President George W. Bush’s broad tax cuts—all initiated with the GOP controlling both the White House and Congress.  Now Republicans have belatedly decided that borrowing is bad too, but they dogmatically resist even the most sensible and painless tax hikes.”

The Republicans are so opposed to either collecting any income tax from GE and other corporations, or stopping taxpayer subsidies for oil companies and other special interests, that they are refusing to raise the debt ceiling unless Democrats agree to slash Social Security, Medicare, education, housing, transportation funding, infrastructure, research, healthcare, or anything else that actually benefits communities and the middle class.   They tell people through mailers and tele-town halls that they have to reduce benefits to save Social Security, all the while knowing that Social Security is solvent enough to fully pay benefits until 2036, and is not contributing to the debt at all right now.

Republican members are also misleading the middle class and small businesses by asking them if they want to pay more taxes, and then reporting back the answer was no. Of course it is no. The middle is tired of paying for the breaks the tax structure gives to the top 1% and multinational corporations.  NOBODY is talking about raising the taxes on the middle class, and Republicans know that. They are misleading the public and distracting them from the real issue. Their ideology and agenda will not allow them to raise revenue to help us dig out of this mountain of debt that their ideology got us in.  Democrats do not get a free pass on the debt since they certainly have contributed, and many voted to continue the Bush tax cuts for two years, but as USA Today noted, it was the recent spending since Clinton’s budget surplus that got this country into deep trouble.

Sad, isn’t it?  Although NH members vote with their party at least 95% of the time, I hope they will rise above politics and vote with Ronald Reagan rather than their current leadership.  America is counting on them to do the right thing.

###

Former Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter represented New Hampshire’s First District from 2007-2011.  She wrote the proposal for and established a non-profit, social service agency, which continues to serve all ages.  She taught politics and history and is a strong supporter of Medicare and Social Security.

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (8)

Carol,

Great job of cutting and pasting Obama's talking points.
July 8, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterGreyGhost
Oh Carol ... Burnett –
You put on quite a show, once again. I just loved it when you dragged out Harvey Korman to bolster your assertion that your buddy BozObama would stiff the debt holders before he would begrudge those on the dole a single handout. LOL funny. In case you weren't paying attention, those who work are sick and tired of paying for your voting block. Fortunately, your regular folk were too lazy and engrossed in the latest re-run of West Wing to vote you back in.

Here's a new reality Carol: money no longer grows on carbon-eating trees; but the Fed sure is making lots of it by cuttin' them down and a printin' and a printin' till they can print no mo-a. Why, I do declare, lil Abna just fell off his turnip truck.

Now, I think I'll just return to a sippin' my tea and watch all the upcoming fireworks of the wonks and wankers a clashin' along the banks of the Potomac. Sure does look fun.
– C. dog casts line to catch bottom-feeders
July 8, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterC. dog
yah, where ya going with this Carol? You didn't write this....
July 9, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRichard Olson Jr.
Ohhh Carol –
When pontificating about political ideology, you were slamming only the bad kind – Republican Ideology, å la "Republican, Scott Brown". Now an inquiring mind might dig a little deeper than your surface partisan attack to find out just why, oh why does a big biz like GE not pay taxes. Low and behold, management is tight with BozObama and the Green Machine ideology. Presto, no income taxes! Should we expect this to come to light in your next installment of enlightened political commentary? Or will you be too entrenched in Democrat Ideology? "Democrat Carol Shea-Porter, partisan for left-wing communist ideology once again attempts to undermine the American Way."
– C. dog cast fly to floundering fish
July 10, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterC. dog
Haven't we heard more than enough from this self absorbed lizard woman?
July 10, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRowland
Rowland,

You would think after four years of the following exchanges between Nancy Pelosi and Carol Shea-Pelosi, Carol would want a new career.

Nancy: Sit Carol

Nancy: Speak Carol, (ten second lapse) Nancy: That's enough Carol.

Nancy: Vote fo this Carol. What? I don't care ifi you have read it or not, just
do what I say.
July 11, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterGreyGhost
I really want to know what is going to happen to the small man. Is he going to be made extinct because we are too busy putting our country finances into other countries? What about what is going on here at home?
July 29, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterKathyrn Sias

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.