<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.166 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:33:24 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>NHInsider Guest Bloggers - Comments</title><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/nhigb/</link><description></description><copyright>Copyright NHInsider.com 2009-2010</copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.166 (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><item><title>Rep Steve Vaillancourt comments on John F.J. Sullivan - Casino gambling slightly favored, but NH is hardly ‘all in’</title><author>Rep Steve Vaillancourt</author><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:49:55 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/nhigb/2013/5/20/john-fj-sullivan-casino-gambling-slightly-favored-but-nh-is.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:612487:comment/20034434</guid><description><![CDATA[New Hampshire is not a referendum state, so there is no mechanism for a vote by the people.  Most likely, a constitutional amendment would be required to make us a referendum state and then, any number of issues could come forth...not just gambling.  It&#39;s not going to happen.<br/>The problem, as always, is that while a majority supports expanded gambling, there&#39;s no poll on this plan.  Since the state would get only 30 percent, as opposed to 55 percent a few years ago, I would suspect thoughtful people would oppose this plan if they were aware of the details.]]></description></item><item><title>James H Annis comments on John F.J. Sullivan - Casino gambling slightly favored, but NH is hardly ‘all in’</title><author>James H Annis</author><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:13:45 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/nhigb/2013/5/20/john-fj-sullivan-casino-gambling-slightly-favored-but-nh-is.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:612487:comment/20034336</guid><description><![CDATA[I read one poll that said 63% of NH residents support this Casino/ expanded gambling. It does, however, look like it will once again fail in The House. It is time to get this question out The House, and to a direct vote of the citizens of NH, the hous e is clearly not listening to us on this isuue.]]></description></item><item><title>Harold comments on Andrew Manuse - Here's what I would have said to apologize</title><author>Harold</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 04:01:39 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/nhigb/2013/5/4/andrew-manuse-heres-what-i-would-have-said-to-apologize.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:612487:comment/20023631</guid><description><![CDATA[No doubt a vindictive smear campaign was orchestrated against Rep. Tremblay for filing and defending HB 638.     Rep. Tremblay doesn’t owe anyone an apology for her remarks pertaining to the Boston Marathon bombing.    I tried to expose the lie, fraud and falsehoods reported of the tragic event.   Who are the perpetuators of this fraud?   no idea, you figure it out if you can.  Believe me, I take no pride in this exposure and to educate.  Three people (maybe a fourth) have lost their lives, the injury count is not consistently reported, 175-300 according to news reports.  If accurate.  May I ask, if two bomb exploded loaded with nails and metal as reported, why aren’t the flags ripped and torn in the area of the bomb blast?   Lives have been shattered and ruin never be the same.   An attempt was made by the intellectual whores to add Rep. Tremblay to the list of causalities.  When I’m done you decide whether her remarks have any validity.  Asking an elected officer to vacate a position (of trust) for voicing an opinion is totally outrageous.  Whether Rep Tremblay’s remarks are valid or not,  is no reason for forced resignation.   Rep. Tremblay has displayed more testicular fortitude than all her critics put together.  Matter of fact Stella Tremblay is owed an apology.   <br/><br/>The drama with the amputee was a stage event.  I’m not going to name the amputee, for I have no idea of his true identity, he has been dub the ’Miracle Man’, due to respect I will refer to him as the same.   Boston MBTA officer Donohue was wound by one of his own at the Watertown confrontation.  A bullet entered his leg and severed an artery.  Officer Donohue was almost DOA, bleed to death.  Emergency room staff manage to save his life. (Report of the Boston Globe).  Now , we have the Miracle Man, lost of both legs, stays conscious in a wheelchair, no visible spurting of blood, able to identify who place the bomb from videos and appears at a hockey game 19 days later with a fitted prostheses.  Just a miracle you ask?  No, fraud with plenty of helpers.  In all this script (the use of script is not derogatory to the real victims) and videos (bomb scene) , not a lot of coverage of other injured spectators.  Why? <br/><br/><a target="new" rel="nofollow" href="http://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/05/10/dr-stan-monteith-a-35-year-orthopedic-surgeon-on-jeff-baumans-leg-amputations-i-believe-that-this-young-man-was-an-actor/">http://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/05/10/dr-stan-monteith-a-35-year-orthopedic-surgeon-on-jeff-baumans-leg-amputations-i-believe-that-this-young-man-was-an-actor/</a>]]></description></item><item><title>Jim Splaine comments on Andrew Manuse - Here's what I would have said to apologize</title><author>Jim Splaine</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:09:53 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/nhigb/2013/5/4/andrew-manuse-heres-what-i-would-have-said-to-apologize.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:612487:comment/20023315</guid><description><![CDATA[lol  Cute, David.  But nope, you&#39;re wrong -- my post has everything I said.  It posted correctly.  It&#39;s yours that is missing the &quot;factual&quot; information.  Yours just has made-up junk created by kooks that you got off the Internet.  <br/><br/>America has always had its share of people who hate our country and make things up, but in the age of the Internet it&#39;s easier for them to get their stuff out to fellow kooks, not that I&#39;m calling you that.  <br/><br/>Just like the photo-shopped pictures of the Boston Marathon Bombing that gives people like Stella Tromblay some idea that it was fake.  Absolutely amazing and as I said earlier -- quite disgusting to do that to fellow Americans.  <br/><br/>And engaging those kooks gives them a credibility of legitimate debate that I care not to offer.  They&#39;re not worth it.  And they won&#39;t change their conspiracy-prone, anti-American views anyway.  So I urge you not to fall for their kookiness and repost their trash.  <br/><br/>So read my post again, David -- it&#39;s all there.  The baloney appears in what jm and you wrote.]]></description></item><item><title>David Johnson comments on Andrew Manuse - Here's what I would have said to apologize</title><author>David Johnson</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 23:43:32 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/nhigb/2013/5/4/andrew-manuse-heres-what-i-would-have-said-to-apologize.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:612487:comment/20023280</guid><description><![CDATA[Jim; Splaine,<br/><br/>Please check your writing.  It appears as if part of your last message didn&#39;t get posted.  As I read through it, all I saw was prefacing remarks.  The factual content seems to have been omitted.  <br/><br/>                                                                                                     David]]></description></item><item><title>Jim Splaine comments on Andrew Manuse - Here's what I would have said to apologize</title><author>Jim Splaine</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:09:40 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/nhigb/2013/5/4/andrew-manuse-heres-what-i-would-have-said-to-apologize.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:612487:comment/20023065</guid><description><![CDATA[Ohhhhh My David.  So you are the scholarly kingpin in all our land about all things Constitution?  I must have missed your name in the history books or the lists of contemporary scholars.  Sorry for the oversight.  <br/><br/>Of course, you and yours think you have all the answers in your anti-USA rants.  And now you elevate Rep. Tromblay to the ranks of the intelligent?  <br/><br/>I don&#39;t have to do your &quot;research&quot; or &quot;fact-finding&quot; for you.  And I won&#39;t waste MY time telling the likes of YOU why your silly putty is so off-this-planet.  I suggest you simply buy a good book on the history of our nation and our constitution.  There are a lot out there that haven&#39;t been written by conspiracy theory crazies.  <br/><br/>So sad that you and the conspiracy Flat Earthers hate America so much.  But, to each your own.  <br/><br/>You&#39;re welcome for this helpful advice.]]></description></item><item><title>David Johnson comments on Andrew Manuse - Here's what I would have said to apologize</title><author>David Johnson</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:25:15 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/nhigb/2013/5/4/andrew-manuse-heres-what-i-would-have-said-to-apologize.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:612487:comment/20022495</guid><description><![CDATA[Jim Splaine,<br/><br/>You blew it.  Your comments are both irrelevant and incompetent.  You were given the exact codes and statutes and historical records.  I observe that you seem to have a pattern of doing this with others, as well.  <br/><br/>The constitution as was written over two hundred years ago, is gone.  It&#39;s in all the publications from the states before 1871.  I have the copies and photographs from the archives.  <br/><br/>Seriously, I recommend you hit the books and read extensively before you outgas such nonsense.]]></description></item><item><title>Jim Splaine comments on Andrew Manuse - Here's what I would have said to apologize</title><author>Jim Splaine</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:45:24 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/nhigb/2013/5/4/andrew-manuse-heres-what-i-would-have-said-to-apologize.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:612487:comment/20020901</guid><description><![CDATA[David -- You&#39;re a very funny and off-the-planet sort of guy.  But you&#39;re certainly welcome to share your ignorance in this great land of The United States of America, of which The Great State of New Hampshire is one of 50 proud states, living together under a Constitution which I trust has been properly written, documented, and interpreted by people much more qualified than either you or I.]]></description></item><item><title>David Johnson comments on Andrew Manuse - Here's what I would have said to apologize</title><author>David Johnson</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 22:10:05 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/nhigb/2013/5/4/andrew-manuse-heres-what-i-would-have-said-to-apologize.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:612487:comment/20020670</guid><description><![CDATA[Everyone needs to read the book, &quot;THE CIVIL WAR WITH NO ENDING&quot; by April Reigne.<br/><br/>The UNITED STATES CORPORATION, formerly the British Virginia Colony Company set up shop in D.C. back in 1871.  They were and still operate under the Leiber Code/Martial Law.<br/><br/>Roosevelt amended the Trading With The Enemy Act to make U.S. citizens all enemies of the State.  That&#39;s why people are defecting from being U.S. citizens and repatriating as American Nationals.<br/><br/>There are 400 Representatives in the STATE HOUSE.  Only 5 know that STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE is actually UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 4.  That&#39;s why Representative is the subject of ridicule.  She is one of them.  If we had a constitutional Republic, there would be implementation of Articles 31 &amp; 32 of the New Hampshire Bill of Rights, for Petitions for Redress of Grievances.  Also, there would be no BAR ASSOCIATION attorneys in New Hampshire government.<br/><br/>A twisted perversion of justice occurred when Steve Vaillancourt tabled HB638 after the Democrats tried to kill it in Committee.  All State and Federal publications prior to 1871 posted the true constitution, yet he saw fit to take the discussion of the Bill off the floor, so the world would not hear the real truth.  <br/><br/>Vaillancourt also violated his oath of office a second time ( that I know of ) when he supported HB135.  In no uncertain terms, that guy is a dangerous criminal, and an imminent threat to the people on New-Hampshire soil.  He is without credibility, and without the capability to make rational decisions based upon critical thinking.  He has no business wasting the time of the people who read this NH INSIDER.   He&#39;s just another liberal.  They have absolutely no respect for law or history or the constitutions.  His main effort seems to be at perfecting the role of a sneaky usurper.  The people need to bounce him right off his seat.]]></description></item><item><title>jm comments on Andrew Manuse - Here's what I would have said to apologize</title><author>jm</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:32:05 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/nhigb/2013/5/4/andrew-manuse-heres-what-i-would-have-said-to-apologize.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:612487:comment/20020443</guid><description><![CDATA[To Jim Splain<br/><br/>Not sure what Flat Earth Society or moon landing staged in a studio has to do with Boston bombing.  I never mentioned them.<br/><br/>As to the &#39;disgusting &quot;analysis&quot; &#39;, you have provided no evidence as to how or why it is disgusting.<br/><br/>Nothing from you in the way of intelligent discourse -- only ad hominems.]]></description></item></channel></rss>