for the World
In an ideal society, those chosen to represent and lead the people would be chosen because they had shown 'leadership qualities' - honesty, integrity, intelligence (both emotional and intellectual) and, most importantly, a paternal or maternal protective instinct towards others.
In short, leaders would be those that could effectively lead the society in a way that secured the best interests of all. Ideal leaders would certainly not be 'war-like' but rather peace-makers. So why don't we have societies like this around the world today? Does power really corrupt? Is it inevitable that any human being elevated to a leadership role will succumb to the lure of power and control over others and ultimately turn bad and against the people? Do we conclude therefore that the very idea that one or a few should lead the many is simply a bad one?
Read More >>>
Today's Featured Stories...
- The Day the Water Died: Detoxing after the Gulf Oil Spill, by Gabriela Segura, M.D.
- JAMES PETRAS: IMPERIALISM AND IMPERIAL BARBARISM
- AMERICA'S "JUSTICE" IN OCCUPIED IRAQ: WHY TARIQ AZIZ SHOULD BE RELEASED
- Respiratory Studies re 1-Treatment and 1-Diagnostic Biomarker Gulf War Illness
- Research Reports Gulf War Illness-Part 1
- Delaware GOP/Tea Party Senate Candidate O'Donnell Opposes Women in Military
- Former Military Hospital Site Urged as PTSD Treatment Facility
- Top 10 Veterans Stories in Today's News
- Gone But Not Forgotten