Press Releases

 

Entries in Carbon Tax (85)

Tuesday
Mar112014

NRSC - Shaheen's Radical Anti-Energy Stance Far Outside the Mainstream 

March 11, 2014

"Talk-a-Thon" Highlights How Out-Of-Touch Jeanne Shaheen is With Granite Staters- Energy Development 
Jeanne Shaheen a Key Senator in Radical Obama/Reid
War on American Energy 

A majority of Democrats planned to take over the Senate floor to protest climate change and advocate for policies that hurt American energy development in a so-called "talk-a-thon" this week.

As USA Today reported, "The Democratic effort is cause for some confusion because these senators are calling for action in a chamber they control but without any specific legislation to offer up for a vote, or any timetable for action this year."

Jeanne Shaheen has had a rough few weeks and now is highlighting another issue where she finds herself defending liberal extremists and opposing American energy development and the job creations and economic benefits that come with it.  Shaheen is one of the most radical members of the United States Senate and an enemy of American energy, and is a staunch advocate for radical cap-and-trade legislation and other policies that would hurt New Hampshire. Shaheen's blind support for this radical agenda would mean harmful red tape regulation, higher taxes, and higher costs that would cripple entire industries and destroy local jobs in New Hampshire.

"Energy development at home is key to creating jobs, helping working families, and growing our economy yet Jeanne Shaheen has constantly put radical liberal special interests ahead of what's best for Granite Staters," said NRSC Press Secretary Brook Hougesen. "Jeanne Shaheen is one of President Obama's most important soldiers in the War on American Energy, voting with him an eye-opening 99% - even when those policies hurt families and workers in New Hampshire. Jeanne Shaheen's extreme views are far outside the mainstream which is why Granite Staters are excited about the possibility of supporting someone new that they can trust and rely on." 

 

BACKGROUND

In March 2013, Shaheen Voted For A Pro-Carbon Tax Amendment

In March 2013, Shaheen For A Pro-Carbon Tax Amendment. “Whitehouse, D-R.I., amendment no. 646 that would establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund to allow for legislation that would provide for a fee on carbon pollution and use revenues collected to reduce the deficit.” (S. Con. Res. 8, CQ Vote #58: Rejected 41-58: R 0-45; D 39-13; I 2-0, 3/22/13, Shaheen Voted Yea)

A Carbon Tax Could Cost Up To 10,000 Jobs In New Hampshire. “This tax would deal a blow to employment in New Hampshire, with a loss of worker income equivalent to 7,000 to 10,000 jobs in 2013 and 10,000 by 2023.” (National Association Of Manufacturers, “Adverse Economic Impacts Of A Carbon Tax In New Hampshire,” www.nam.org, Accessed 5/28/13)

A Carbon Tax Could Increase The Price Of Gas In New Hampshire By More Than 20 Cents Per Gallon. “Prices at the pump would jump by more than 20 cents a gallon in 2013.” (National Association Of Manufacturers, “Adverse Economic Impacts Of A Carbon Tax In New Hampshire,” www.nam.org, Accessed 5/28/13)

A Carbon Tax Could Increase The Cost Of Electricity For New Hampshire Families By 18 Percent. “Households in New Hampshire would see a significant increase in their electricity rates, with an average increase of 18 percent in 2013.” (National Association Of Manufacturers, “Adverse Economic Impacts Of A Carbon Tax In New Hampshire,” www.nam.org, Accessed 5/28/13)

A Carbon Tax Could Increase The Cost Of Natural Gas By More Than 40 Percent. “The cost of using natural gas would increase by more than 40 percent in 2013, the first year of the carbon tax study, adding to household energy bills and increasing operation costs for many New Hampshire businesses.” (National Association Of Manufacturers, “Adverse Economic Impacts Of A Carbon Tax In New Hampshire,” www.nam.org, Accessed 5/28/13)

Shaheen Supports Cap-And-Trade

In 2008, Shaheen Supported Legislation To Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions By 80% By 2050. “‘She supports many of the aims of the Warner-Lieberman bill,’ Shaheen spokeswoman Kate Bedingfield said in a statement. ‘She supports the goal of cutting carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2050, and in the U.S. Senate will push for a comprehensive plan to achieve that goal that includes economy-wide emissions reductions, aggressive research and development for new energy technologies , work with international partners to achieve global emissions reductions, and incentives for energy efficiency and clean alternative energy sources.’” (John P. Gregg, “N.H. Senators Face Pressure,” [White River Junction, VT] Valley News, 6/6/08)

The Average New Hampshire Household Would Have Spent $405 More For Gasoline Every Year By 2025 As A Result Of Lieberman-Warner. (William W. Beach , David W. Kreutzer, Ben Lieberman and Nicolas Loris, “How New Hampshire Would Be Affected By The Lieberman-Warner Climate Change Legislation,” The Heritage Foundation, Web Memo #1930-NH, 5/20/08)

New Hampshire Would Have Lost 2,996 Jobs By 2025. (William W. Beach , David W. Kreutzer, Ben Lieberman and Nicolas Loris, “How New Hampshire Would Be Affected By The Lieberman-Warner Climate Change Legislation,” The Heritage Foundation, Web Memo #1930-NH, 5/20/08)

New Hampshire Would Have Lost 11,567 Manufacturing Jobs By 2030. (William W. Beach , David W. Kreutzer, Ben Lieberman and Nicolas Loris, “How New Hampshire Would Be Affected By The Lieberman-Warner Climate Change Legislation,” The Heritage Foundation, Web Memo #1930-NH, 5/20/08)

Shaheen Has Supported Allowing The EPA To Regulate Greenhouse Gases

In March 2013, Shaheen Voted Against An Amendment That Would Assume For A Ban On The EPA Regulating Carbon Emissions. “Inhofe, R-Okla., amendment no. 359 that would adjust the resolution to assume for a ban on the EPA regulation of carbon emissions.” (S. Con. Res. 8, CQ Vote #76: Rejected 47-52: R 44-1; D 3-49; I 0-2, 3/23/13, Shaheen Voted Nay)

In April 2011, Shaheen Voted Against An Amendment That Would Have Blocked The EPA From Regulating Carbon Dioxide And Other Greenhouse Gasses. “McConnell, R-Ky., amendment no. 183 that would block the EPA from regulating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.” (S. 493, CQ Vote #54: Rejected 50-50: R 46-1; D 4-47; I 0-2, 4/6/11, Shaheen Voted Nay)

###

Friday
Jan032014

CEI Today: Fiat getting a bailout?, quantitative easing, and social cost of carbon canard 

Friday, January 3, 2014
In the News Today

FIAT BAILOUT - JOHN BERLAU


Fox Business: Fiat getting a bailout from U.S. taxpayers?


Competitive Enterprise Institute’s John Berlau and Forbes Media Chairman Steve Forbes on Fiat’s deal to take full control of Chrysler. > View the Fox Business discussion

> See also: The Great Italian Auto Bailout — Courtesy of U.S. Taxpayers

 

> Interview John Berlau

> Follow John Berlau on Twitter

 

FED BOND-BUYING - RYAN YOUNG


Washington Times: Stop the money presses! Two cheers for ‘tapered quantitative easing’

 

Leading up to Janet Yellen’s Jan. 6 confirmation vote, the Federal Reserve recently announced that it will taper back its bond-buying program, known as quantitative easing. This was encouraging news for inflation hawks, if barely so. Right now, the Fed buys $85 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities and Treasury bonds every month from financial firms. These firms, flush with cash from the Fed, then diffuse those dollars throughout the economy through loans and other financial activities. Going forward, the Fed will roll back its monthly purchases from $85 billion to $75 billion, or roughly 11 percent. This is a good start, but the Fed should go further and taper away the rest of quantitative easing. > Read more

> Inteview Ryan Young

 

> Follow Ryan Young on Twitter

DOE & "SOCIAL COST OF CARBON" - MARLO LEWIS


Globalwarming.org: Social Cost of Carbon: DOE Rejects Petition to Reconsider Microwave Rule

On Christmas eve, the Department of Energy (DOE) rejected the Landmark Legal Foundation’s petition to reconsider the agency’s final rule establishing first-ever energy-efficiency standards for microwave ovens. Whether or not the microwave rule itself has such wide-ranging implications, the social cost of carbon analysis is a potent weapon in the war on coal and other fossil fuels. As a pretext for expanding government control of the economy, redistributing wealth, and rigging energy markets, nothing beats the social cost of carbon. > Read more

> Interview Marlo Lewis

 

 

    

 

CEI is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government.  For more information about CEI, please visit our website, cei.org, and blogs, Globalwarming.org and OpenMarket.org.  Follow CEI on Twitter! Twitter.com/ceidotorg.

 

 




Saturday
Sep212013

ALG's Daily Grind - If Republicans stand firm, Obamacare is toast

Sept. 20, 2013

If Republicans stand firm, Obamacare is toast

Switching to a debt-ceiling strategy midstream on Obamacare will unravel in the time it takes Harry Reid to make breakfast.

Obama's closing of America: Keystone's fifth birthday

Five years for a simple pipeline approval, it would not have been believable before Obama transformed America, now no one would be foolish enough to even apply.

Aussie Abbott set to axe the carbon tax!

While there are debates as to whether or not new Australian prime minister Tony Abbott will have the votes needed in the Senate to overturn the Labor Party's policies (though it looks like he can do it), the will of the people couldn't be clearer — the carbon tax is gone.

Schiff: The taper that wasn't

No exit strategy: "[E]asing up on the accelerator without ever hitting the brakes will not stop the car or turn it around."

Wednesday
Sep182013

ALG - Australian conservatives show how to fight and win on Obamacare

Sept. 17, 2013, Fairfax, VA—Americans for Limited Government President Nathan Mehrens today urged House Republicans to fight like Australians on defunding Obamacare, contending that if it came to a government shutdown, the outcome would not be as purveyors of conventional wisdom predict.

In a letter addressed to House members, Mehrens called attention to the recent landslide election of Tony Abbott in Australia. In 2009, Abbott became leader of Australia's Liberal Party by one vote, defeating Malcolm Turnbull who Mehrens wrote "had agreed to go along with the leftist majority in Parliament and fund a carbon tax scheme in Australia."

The carbon tax "was about as popular as Obamacare is in the United States," Mehrens noted. In the 2013 election, Abbott promised to roll back the unpopular tax on emissions.

"He did not make the mistake of believing that the talking heads of the media's opinion givers had anything to do with the views of the public," Mehrens wrote. Instead, Abbott went against the grain and reclaimed the identity of his party, which in 2009 was acquiescing to the Labor Party's agenda.

Similarly, Mehrens urged House Republicans to "put policy before politics and fund the government with the exception of Obamacare."

"On Obamacare funding, the media opinion is unanimous that in a test of wills the President will win. After recent events in the foreign policy arena that conclusion is laughable.  Who with a straight face could believe that Obama will shut down his beloved bureaucracy for a prolonged period in order to save a program that is despised by the voters?" Mehrens asked.

For now, the media elite and political establishment in Washington, D.C. are of the view that a government shutdown over funding Obamacare would favor Democrats politically.

But a recent poll by Rasmussen Reports found "51 percent of voters favor having a partial government shutdown until Democrats and Republicans agree on what spending for the health care law to cut."

Moreover, Mehrens wrote, "As in all government shut downs (i.e. weekends) essential government employees are kept on the job while the non-essential are furloughed."

He continued, "When Obama realizes that this means his Environmental Protection Agency will be slowed down in its attempts to shut down power plants, the Department of Justice will be hampered in filing frivolous lawsuits, the Internal Revenue war on anyone who disagrees with him will be hampered, and various other of his efforts to transform America will be hindered, he will no doubt rush to the bargaining table."

Meaning, a shutdown might not only win public support if it means cutting Obamacare, but that it could force concessions by the Obama administration on the health care law.

In other words, it might actually work. "Good policy is good politics as the recent Australian election demonstrates," Mehrens concluded.

To view online: http://getliberty.org/australian-conservatives-show-how-to-fight-and-win-on-obamacare/

Attachments:

Letter to House Republicans by ALG President Nathan Mehrens, Sept. 17, 2013 at http://getliberty.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/LetterDefundObamacare-9-17-13.pdf 

###

Americans for Limited Government is a non-partisan, nationwide network committed to advancing free market reforms, private property rights and core American liberties. For more information on ALG please visit our website at www.GetLiberty.org.

Tuesday
Aug202013

CEI Today: Green advocacy polling, net neutrality, and carbon tax campaign faltering

Tuesday, August 20, 2013
In the News Today

GREEN ADVOCACY POLLING - MARLO LEWIS

National Journal: Where Is the Public on Energy and Climate Policy?


Marlo Lewis exposes the tricks of the polling trade for National Journal, calling out misleading polling put out by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, and the American Lung Association.

Reporters covering advocacy polls seldom make any effort to expose rhetorical trickery, solicit comment from experts not employed by the pollster or the sponsor, or question the honest-broker status of agency-subsidized advocacy groups.
> Read more


> Interview Marlo Lewis

 

NET NEUTRALITY - WAYNE CREWS

Openmarket.org: Before Net Neutrality Eats the World, Part 1: Net Neutrality vs. Infrastructure Wealth

On September 9, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will hear oral arguments in Verizon’s challenge of the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) December 2010 Order on “Preserving the Free and Open Internet.”

The arguments mark the critical culmination of a longstanding effort by FCC to expand power over speech and infrastructure in America in violation not merely of the Constitution and the rule of law (as plaintiffs and allies certainly allege; my organization took part in an amici curiae brief), but of common sense, economic efficiency, and consumer welfare. > Read more

> Interview Wayne Crews

 
 

CARBON TAX

Daily Caller: Conservatives for carbon tax campaign faltering




Though some have tried to make a conservative case for a carbon support, there is little evidence many conservatives or Republicans actually support the idea.  This vote against a carbon tax in an ALEC meeting in Chicago about two weeks ago comes after Republicans in both the House and the Senate voted unanimously against a carbon tax earlier this year.

 

“Unfortunately, the Obama Administration is implementing a number of regulations to raise energy costs.  A strong vote for the Scalise anti-carbon tax amendment should be just the first step in the House’s efforts to block and de-fund President Obama’s radical climate agenda,” said Myron Ebell, president of Freedom Action. > Read more

> Interview Myron Ebell

 

   

 

 

CEI is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government.  For more information about CEI, please visit our website, cei.org, and blogs, Globalwarming.org and OpenMarket.org.  Follow CEI on Twitter! Twitter.com/ceidotorg.

 



100 People to Watch This Fall

 

 

Christopher Horner, CEI Senior Fellow


Twitter.com/Chris_C_Horner

Workplacechoice Congressional Scorecard

For the full score of the NLRB confirmation vote, see our Congressional Scorecard.