Press Releases

 

Entries in Constitution (143)

Monday
Sep152014

ALG's Daily Grind - House Republicans push to make subprime, higher risk lending easier? 

6

Sept. 15, 2014

Permission to republish original opeds granted.

House Republicans push to make subprime, higher risk lending easier?
Legislation eliminates independent appraisals for higher risk mortgages. But aren't those the ones where an honest valuation is the most important?

Is Congress going to mess up TV?
It is not all that surprising that a retiring Senate Committee chairman would be grasping in the last days in power for one last legacy achievement, but it is shocking when the ranking member seems intent on helping him achieve it.

Don't give up America's economic and competitive advantage
Clinton on climate change: "This is the most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of challenges we face as a nation and a world."

Ackerman: Obama's betrayal of the Constitution
"It's preposterous to suggest that a congressional vote 13 years ago can be used to legalize new bombings in Syria and additional (noncombat) forces in Iraq."

 

Saturday
Aug302014

Rubens For US Senate - Brown Citizen-Stripping Proposal A Flagrant Attack on Constitutional Liberty 

The rise of barbaric enemies like ISIS makes it critically important that we do everything within our power to protect our citizens.  During times like these good intentions can lead to stripping away of personal liberties.

 

That is exactly what Scott Brown proposed this morning, calling for the stripping of citizenship from Americans.  This is not a new proposal, in fact it was introduced in 2010 and 2012 in Congress.  Both times, it was very quickly determined that they so egregiously violated the Constitution, they never even made it to a vote.

 

There are many reasons it violates the Constitution including only requiring that the violation was "more likely to happen than not" and the vague definition of "engaging in hostilities against American or its allies" which could be broad enough to include donating books to a school in Afghanistan.  The Supreme Court has long recognized that the constitutional right of citizenship cannot be taken away unless a person obtained it illegally or voluntarily renounced American citizenship,

 

This is a reaction based on fear and anger rather than smart counter-terrorism policy.  A recent example of this was when Scott Brown voted for the Patriot Act.  The Patriot Act has allowed the government to spy on our e-mails and phone conversations and has done nothing to reduce the threat of terrorism.

 

Anyone found to be aiding terrorist should be brought to swift justice.  Our system already allows for that without the stripping away of Constitutional rights of the citizens we are trying to protect.

Sunday
Jul272014

Watchdog - Citizen goes extra mile for justice  

Friday
Jun272014

NH HRA Comments on US Supreme Court ruling on unconstitutional buffer zones 

The House Republican Alliance released a statement today on the unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court that 35 feet buffer zones around some businesses are unconstitutional.  A similar law, SB 319, with buffer zones of 25 feet was recently signed into law in New Hampshire by Gov. Hassan after a bitter fight in the New Hampshire House of Representatives on the grounds of its constitutionality.  The House passed this bill just weeks ago by a mere 162 votes out of the 400 members due to members not being present.  The Governor then promptly signed the bill, showing her true commitment to the radical left pushing the bill.  The ruling today shows how out of touch our Governor is with the rest of the legal system as well as the citizens of New Hampshire. She, as an attorney, should have known that the SB319 was a blatant violation of the Constitution and should have waited for this ruling prior to signing the bill.

 
"The US Supreme Court's unanimous decision today simply confirms what the HRA members believed when they fought against SB 319, that it infringes on freedom of speech." stated JR. Hoell, Dunbarton. "Governor Hassan's signing of the bill must be either because she does not understand our constitutional rights, or has little regard for them.  "Free speech zones" that prohibit citizens from demonstrating or otherwise expressing their opinions in some locations are blatant affronts to our freedom  of speech. Yes, it's sometimes annoying, but democracy is messy and one person's convenience is no reason to limit another's right to speak out."
Saturday
Mar292014

Compelling Evidence of the Forgery of Obama’s Birth Certificate Lodged with the United States Supreme Court, Case No.: 13-1158

Washington D.C. (MMD Newswire) March 28, 2014 -- Douglas Vogt has lodged with the United States Supreme Court his compelling forensic evidence that the Birth Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, II is indisputably a forgery.

That forensic evidence is contained in Vogt's 95 page Public (http://www.obamaforgerybook.com/PDF_Files/Memorandum_of_Law_on_Sealing_Affidavit_10-21-13.pdf) and 75 page Sealed Affidavits. Barack Hussein Obama, II - at his White House Press Conference on April 27, 2011 - released his Birth Certificate to prove that he was Constitutionally-eligible to be President. The lodging of the Affidavits accompanied Vogt's filing of a Petition for Certiorari with the Supreme Court which has been assigned Case No: 13-1158 (http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13-1158.htm). That Petition seeks review of the refusal of the Federal District Court to refer Vogt's Affidavits to a federal Grand Jury as required by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 6(a) (http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6).

Rule 6(a) states: "When the public interest so requires, the court must order that one or more grand juries be summoned." Vogt's Petition argues that there can be no higher "public interest" than the issue of whether Barack Hussein Obama, II, has foisted a forged Birth Certificate upon the Citizens of the United States. Accordingly, the Petition argues, the lower federal court has breached its Congressionally-imposed duty to "summon" a Grand Jury to hear Vogt's well-founded, forensic proof of the forgery of Obama's Birth Certificate.

At its core, the Petition raises the issue of who can seek invocation of the Grand Jury's Constitutionally-unique investigative power. As well documented by Justice Scalia and others of the Supreme Court, originally that right to communicate to the Grand Jury could be invoked by anyone so that the Grand Jury could investigate any matter: "no matter how or by whom suggested to them." Yet, as recognized by Justice Douglas in United States v. Dioniso (http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/1/case.html), it is: "common knowledge that the Grand Jury, having been conceived as a bulwark between the citizen and the Government, is now a tool of the Executive."

Said Vogt: "All I ask is that a Grand Jury hear my forensic evidence regarding Obama's Birth Certificate. Then, if they think warranted, by issuing a few documentary subpoenas, the Grand Jury can quickly answer the question We the People have a right to know: Is the office of the President being held by one who is not Constitutionally-eligible to hold that office and who may not even be a U.S. citizen? The small burden on: (i) the Hawaiian Department of Health (ii) Occidental College, (iii) Columbia University, (iv) Harvard Law School, (v) the Social Security Administration, (vi) U.S. Center for Disease Control, Department of Vital Statistics, (vii) the Selective Service Administration and (viii) the Law Firm of Perkins Coie to produce their records regarding Obama is minimal. Through such subpoenas, this important question will be answered once and for all: Is Obama really who he says he is?"

For More Information Contact:
Douglas Vogt
doug@vectorpub.com

- E n d -

See full press release with links here:
http://www.mmdnewswire.com/forgery-of-obama-birth-certificate-130521.html


----
This press release distributed by Mass Media Distribution LLC,