Press Releases

 

Entries in EPA (538)

Wednesday
Aug122015

CEI Today: EPA Clean Power Plan, government nutrition, "I, Whiskey," credit card interest rates, and more 

Tuesday, August 11, 2015
In the News Today

 

OBAMA CLEAN POWER PLAN 

 

Guest Post: Primer on Administrator McCarthy’s Talk Tomorrow on “The Promise of the Clean Power Plan”

 

Tuesday, August 11, the EPA Administrator, Gina McCarthy, will present a talk entitled “The Promise of the Clean Power Plan." Former EPA official Alan Carlin has prepared a handout on behalf of  the Cooler Heads Coalition:

 

"You are unlikely to hear today why the EPA so-called “Clean Power Plan” (CPP) needs to be rescinded, so this is an alternative view for your consideration concerning the Plan." > Read more

> Interview an expert

 

GOVERNMENT NUTRITION - MICHELLE MINTON


Government Nutritionists Wrong… Again
 

Add it to the list of things that the government got wrong when it comes to nutrition: skipping breakfast may not make you fat. It turns out this apparent truism isn’t so true and the idea has only been in circulation for the last five years or so. > Read more

 

> Interview Michelle Minton

 

I, WHISKEY - LAWSON BADER

 

William Faulkner Said it Best: "Civilization Begins with Distillation"
 

With I, Whiskey: The Spirit of the Market, we aim to tell these and other stories: be they about rebels or scientists, criminals or statesmen, holy men or bootleggers. In other words, it’s the story of us. > Read more
 

 

CREDIT CARD INTEREST RATES - IAIN MURRAY

 

CEI and Allies Submit Evidence to Australian Senate Inquiry on Credit Cards
 

Monday, CEI and other members of the International Alliance for Electronic Payments joined the Australian Taxpayers Alliance in submitting evidence to an Australian Senate inquiry into credit card interest rates and related matters. CEI has long been concerned about the effects of regulation on the payments card industry and helped found the International Alliance in order to help ward off these harmful effects all over the world. > Read more


> Interview Iain Murray

 





Realclearradio.org

Bloomberg Boston
1pm & 7pm ET
Bloomberg San Francisco 10am & 4pm PT

 

    

 

CEI is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government.  For more information about CEI, please visit our website, cei.org.  Follow CEI on Twitter! Twitter.com/ceidotorg.

 


I, WHISKEY


Join us in telling the story of the human spirit and the forces that have shaped whiskey and society! >Visit the Indiegogo page

 


Media Contacts: 202-331-2277
Annie Dwyer

Christine Hall
Mary Beth Gombita

Keara Vickers

CEI Issues:

Advancing Capitalism
Business & Gov't
Energy & Environment
Finance & Entrepreneurship
Health & Safety
Human Achievement Hour
Law & Constitution
Labor & Employment
Nanny State
Regulatory Reform
Risk & Consumer Freedom
Tech and Telecom
Trade and International
Transportation & Infrastructure

Sign Up for the Weekly Cooler Heads Digest!

A Friday afternoon e-newsletter on the latest energy and environment happenings. Sign up today!
 





 

Wednesday
Aug122015

CEI Today: EPA water pollution, Red Tape Act, highway spending, and more 

Wednesday, August 12, 2015
In the News Today

 

EPA WATER POLLUTION - CHRIS HORNER


EPA blasted for polluting water in 4 states, 'threatening country with a blackout'
 

“Everybody makes mistakes,” said CEI's Chris Horner. “EPA’s reason for existence and constant expansion is that they don’t make mistakes like others. The problem is government is not like you and I. They’re not accountable.”  > Read more

 

> Interview Chris Horner

 

RED TAPE ACT - WAYNE CREWS 

 

Regulations Endanger Democracy

 

When it comes to regulatory liberalization, the Senate has dragged its feet. An interesting new exception is Sen. Dan Sullivan’s (R-Alaska) RED Tape Act (S. 1944), where the RED stands for “Regulations Endanger Democracy.”

 

This bill is an interesting twist on some “one-for-one” measures that have had some success in Canada. For every rule imposed, one has to go. > Read more


> Interview Wayne Crews

 

WHO DECIDES HIGHWAY SPENDING? - MARC SCRIBNER

 

Little State Choice With the FHTF Funds
 

Would states and localities spend as much on inefficient transit projects without “free” Federal Highway Trust Fund money? > Read the WSJ letter


> Interview Marc Scribner

 

I, WHISKEY - LAWSON BADER

 

William Faulkner Said it Best: "Civilization Begins with Distillation"
 

With I, Whiskey: The Spirit of the Market, we aim to tell these and other stories: be they about rebels or scientists, criminals or statesmen, holy men or bootleggers. In other words, it’s the story of us. > Read more
 

 





Realclearradio.org

Bloomberg Boston
1pm & 7pm ET
Bloomberg San Francisco 10am & 4pm PT

 

    

 

CEI is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government.  For more information about CEI, please visit our website, cei.org.  Follow CEI on Twitter! Twitter.com/ceidotorg.

 


I, WHISKEY


Join us in telling the story of the human spirit and the forces that have shaped whiskey and society! >Visit the Indiegogo page

 


Media Contacts: 202-331-2277
Annie Dwyer

Christine Hall
Mary Beth Gombita

Keara Vickers

CEI Issues:

Advancing Capitalism
Business & Gov't
Energy & Environment
Finance & Entrepreneurship
Health & Safety
Human Achievement Hour
Law & Constitution
Labor & Employment
Nanny State
Regulatory Reform
Risk & Consumer Freedom
Tech and Telecom
Trade and International
Transportation & Infrastructure

Sign Up for the Weekly Cooler Heads Digest!

A Friday afternoon e-newsletter on the latest energy and environment happenings. Sign up today!
 





 

Saturday
Aug082015

Cooler Heads Digest 07 August 2015 

7 August 2015

In the News

EPA Has Been Captured by Green Special Interests
Steven Hayward, Weekly Standard, 7 August 2015

Oops! EPA’s Climate Rules for New Power Plants Would Increase Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Lachlan Markay, Washington Free Beacon, 7 August 2015

World Ignores Obama, Falls in Love with Coal
Stephen Moore, Investor’s Business Daily, 7 August 2015

Lawmakers Take Aim at EPA ‘Sue and Settle’ Collusion
George Russell, FoxNews.com, 5 August 2015

Environment Is Getting Better, Not Worse
Will Coggin, Daily Caller, 5 August 2015

Climate Skepticism: Science, Poverty, Free Speech at Issue
Paul Driessen, Master Resource, 4 August 2015

Obama’s Final Carbon Rule Combines Fake Carrots and a Big Stick
Alex Fitzsimmons, Institute for Energy Research, 4 August 2015

Hillary’s Energy Plan Is Like Obama’s—on Steroids
Marita Noon, RealClearEnergy, 3 August 2015

Wind Subsidies Cost Taxpayers Big
Larry Bell, Newsmax, 3 August 2015

EPA’s Troubling Hiring Binge
Editorial, Investor’s Business Daily, 1 August 2015

News You Can Use
“Clean Power” Plan’s Measly Benefits

According to the Cato Institute’s Chip Knappenberger and Patrick Michaels, the EPA’s Clean Power Plan would limit global warming by .0018 degrees Celsius in 2100.  

Inside the Beltway
Myron Ebell

EPA’s Colossally Costly Power Plan Fulfills Obama’s Campaign Promise

President Barack Obama on 3rd August announced the EPA’s final rules to limit greenhouse gas emissions from new and existing power plants.  In doing so, the President has finally fulfilled a pledge he made when running for president in 2008.  Then-Senator Obama told the San Francisco Chronicle in January 2008 that, “Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.”  

The Existing Source Performance Standards (or ESPS) being applied under section 111d of the Clean Air Act to coal- and gas-fired power plants already in operation are called by the EPA the “Clean Power” Plan. Don’t buy it.  More accurate names would be the Costly Power Plan or the Skyrocketing Rates Power Plan (h/t Alan Carlin) or the Obama Power Grab (h/t Senator McConnell’s office) or the National Energy Tax (h/t Speaker Boehner’s office).

The final ESPS is 1560 pages.  The final rule is significantly different from the proposed rule released in June 2014.  In fact, it is so different that the legal case has already been made that it is a brand new rule and therefore EPA must start the rulemaking process all over again.

Here are some of the major changes from the proposed to the final rule.  EPA has extended the deadlines by two years, but has also increased the emissions reductions that must be achieved by 2030 from 30% to 32% below the 2005 baseline.  The proposed rule contained four “building blocks” by which States can meet their individual targets.

The final rule lowers its estimates of reductions that can be made from building block one—efficiency improvements in generating plants—from 6% to 2-4%.  Reliance on building block two—replacing coal-fired plants with naturalgas-fired plants—has been reduced, while reliance on replacing coal with renewable energy sources (building block three), such as windmills and solar panels, has been increased.  And EPA has dropped gains in energy efficiency (building block four) entirely, although States can still count any emissions reductions that result from efficiency gains. 

The final ESPS gives extra incentives for early moves to more renewable energy.  It also changes the way nuclear plants under construction and those that may be built in the future are counted.  In short, the big loser in the final rule will still be coal, but natural gas will now also be a loser.  It’s not clear to me whether nuclear gains or loses.  But there is no doubt that the big winners will be renewable energy producers, compared to the proposed rule. 

Those are major changes, but by far the biggest change is that EPA has completely recalculated the targets that each State must meet. –Read the rest at GlobalWarming.org.

New Source Performance Standards
Marlo Lewis

EPA’s final “Carbon Pollution Standards” rule, released today, requires new coal-fired power plants to meet a standard of 1,400 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour (1,400 lbs. CO2/MWh) – less stringent than the 1,100 lbs. CO2/MWh standard in the agency’s Jan. 2014 proposed rule.

Under §111 of the Clean Air Act, performance standards are to reflect the “best system of emission reduction” (BSER) that has been “adequately demonstrated,” taking “cost” into account.

EPA says the final standard “better represents the requirement that the BSER be implementable at reasonable cost.” That’s a face-saving way of saying the agency’s original proposal would not have survived judicial review.

Although not as blatantly unreasonable, the rule remains fatally flawed. —Read the rest at GlobalWarming.org.

Proposed Federal Implementation Plan
William Yeatman

Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is required to review state compliance strategies. If the agency disapproves a state plan, then the EPA is required to implement a federal plan in its stead. Therefore, under the “Clean Power” Plan, the EPA would be empowered to impose its own energy policy on unwilling States, if the agency decided that a given state’s submission was insufficiently green. It is unclear what form such a federal energy plan would take, as nothing of this sort (i.e., EPA trying to set national electricity policy) has ever before been attempted under the Clean Air Act. As part of next week’s rollout, the EPA is expected to propose a generic federal takeover of a state’s energy sector. Possible proposals include a federally operated cap-and-trade emissions trading scheme or a direct emissions limits based on system-wide controls. Whatever form the proposal takes, it will engender serious constitutional difficulties

Across the States
William Yeatman

Update on Ongoing Efforts to Stop “Clean Power” Plan

On Wednesday, 16 States (Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Wisconsin, Wyoming and West Virginia) petitioned the EPA to delay implementation of the Clean Power Plan until judicial review of the rule has run its course. Their request was based on the significant differences in how the final rule calculates state requirements from the proposal. They argue that their respective governments spent significant time and resources addressing the rule as proposed, and now that effort is largely wasted because EPA moved the goalposts. The States make an excellent point, but EPA undoubtedly will reject their petition.

In a similar vein, 13 States (Alabama, Alaska, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Wisconsin, West Virginia, Wyoming) and coal-producer Murray Energy on Thursday urged the D.C. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals to rehear their challenge to EPA’s Clean Power Plan. In 2014, these parties had sued to stop the regulation, but in June the D.C. Circuit ruled that it didn’t have jurisdiction to review the rule because it was not yet final. The petitioners argue that the deadline for initial state compliance plans for the “Clean Power” Plan, in September 2016, lend fresh impetus to their challenge. As an alternative to a rehearing, the petitioners have asked the court to stay its June decision, in an apparent effort to have the same three judges conduct judicial review of the final rule. The three judges are widely perceived to be among the most conservative among judges sitting on the D.C. Circuit. EPA opposed this effort in a brief filed Thursday afternoon.
 

The Cooler Heads Digest is the weekly e-mail publication of the Cooler Heads Coalition. For the latest news and commentary, check out the Coalition’s website, www.GlobalWarming.org.

Thursday
Aug062015

CEI Today: EPA's climate coup, firing your labor union, a whiskey documentary, and more 

Thursday, August 6, 2015
In the News Today

 

EPA CLEAN POWER PLAN - MARLO LEWIS

 

EPA’s climate coup
 

How is it appropriate for the EPA to impose major changes in public policy that Congress debated for years and ultimately rejected? > Read the Washington Times commentary 


> Interview Marlo Lewis

 

 

C-SPAN Washington Journal

 
Power Plant Emissions Rule
 
CEI's Myron Ebell gave his perspective on the Obama administration’s announcement of new standards for greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. > Watch the C-SPAN interview

 

 


CYBERSECURITY INFO SHARING - RYAN RADIA

 

Senate Prepares to Vote on Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA)

The Senate scuttled a planned vote on a major cybersecurity information sharing bill until September, after failing to reach a deal on amendments. The bill is a serious threat to civil liberties and privacy, CEI's Ryan Radia warns. > Read more

FIRING THE UNION - TREY KOVACS & JOHN McDONALD     
 

It's Too Hard to Get Rid of a Union

Unions are supposed to advocate for the welfare of the employees they represent. But what happens when a union fails to produce anything of value for its members? > Read more

> Interview an expert

 


I, WHISKEY


Join us in telling the story of the human spirit and the forces that have shaped whiskey and society! >Visit the Indiegogo page

 

>Read the Fox News commentary by Lawson Bader

 




Realclearradio.org

Bloomberg Boston
1pm & 7pm ET
Bloomberg San Francisco 10am & 4pm PT

 

    

 

CEI is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government.  For more information about CEI, please visit our website, cei.org.  Follow CEI on Twitter! Twitter.com/ceidotorg.

 


Media Contacts: 202-331-2277
Annie Dwyer

Christine Hall
Mary Beth Gombita

Keara Vickers

CEI Issues:

Advancing Capitalism
Business & Gov't
Energy & Environment
Finance & Entrepreneurship
Health & Safety
Human Achievement Hour
Law & Constitution
Labor & Employment
Nanny State
Regulatory Reform
Risk & Consumer Freedom
Tech and Telecom
Trade and International
Transportation & Infrastructure

Sign Up for the Weekly Cooler Heads Digest!

A Friday afternoon e-newsletter on the latest energy and environment happenings. Sign up today!
 





 

Wednesday
Aug052015

CEI Responds to EPA Rules: Clean Power Plan and Beyond 

Yesterday, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released two final rules regulating carbon emissions for new and existing power plants that will have a devastating effect on the cost of energy for Americans, our electricity market, and state economies across the country. The agency also issued a new proposed rule for a federal plan to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. The administration’s new carbon rules will make obtaining affordable energy nearly impossible for many American families. See below for commentary by CEI energy experts on the economic effects of these new regulations.

CEI’s Myron Ebell offered this initial response to the EPA’s release of the final rule in its so-called Clean Power Plan

“The EPA’s so-called ‘Clean Power’ Plan to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants is colossally expensive, blatantly illegal, and totally pointless. It will fulfill President Obama’s promise he made when running for president in 2008 to “necessarily skyrocket” people’s electric rates. Consumers, particularly in the heartland states that have affordable electricity from coal-fired plants, are going to see their rates skyrocket, just as the President promised. Workers are going to lose their jobs as energy-intensive manufacturing is forced out of the country. Congress must act quickly and decisively to block the President’s disastrous climate policies.”   

CEI’s Marlo Lewis responded to the EPA’s release of rules for new electric utility sources:

“Because the EPA does not anticipate anyone building new coal-fired power plants, evidently, the new source performance standards rule’s value is purely instrumental – to provide the regulatory springboard for the so-called Clean Power Plan (CPP) for existing power plants.

“EPA’s modification of the new source rule makes one of the CPP’s legal vulnerabilities more conspicuous. The CO2 performance standards in the CPP were already more stringent than those in the proposed new source rule. Now the CPP standards are much more stringent. Never before in the history of the Clean Air Act have Section 111 existing source performance standards been more stringent than the corresponding new source standards.”

CEI’s William Yeatman offered this initial response to the EPA’s proposed rule for a federal plan for greenhouse gas emissions from electric utility:

“As we predicted, EPA’s proposed federal implementation plan (FIP) entails two emissions trading schemes. Of course, Congress has expressly and repeatedly rejected such ‘cap and trade’ schemes, which raises an obvious question: Why is it appropriate for EPA to impose major policies that were refused by Congress? In practice, emissions are virtually synonymous with energy use, and, as a result, EPA’s FIP is not inaccurately labeled an energy-rationing program. Talk about mission creep!”

More from CEI on the so-called "Clean Power Plan" and the EPA's climate agenda: 

 


The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group in Washington, D.C. CEI promotes the institutions of liberty and works to remove government-created barriers to economic freedom, innovation, and prosperity through timely analysis, effective advocacy, inclusive coalition-building, and strategic litigation.