Press Releases


Entries in Fox News (40)



In Case You Missed It

Fox News: Special Report With Bret Baier
July 24, 2014

Last night, Scott Brown sat down with Fox News anchor Bret Baier for a wide ranging interview on the state of the New Hampshire Senate race. Specifically, Brown highlighted a clear contrast with Senator Shaheen on the issues of Obamacare and immigration. 

Click here to see Brown's answer on Obamacare and click here to see his answer on immigration. See a complete transcript of the answers below.

Scott Brown: Obamacare Is A Real Problem In New Hampshire

SCOTT BROWN: It’s the number one issue, but not only that the business mandate coming in after the election. You're finding with businesses and individuals that their rates have gone up, their coverages have gone down, their lines have gone longer, and their ability to get to their doctors and hospitals, their time to get there has gone longer. I can tell you countless families and businesses who are dramatically hurt by this, Obamacare, so it’s a real problem.
BAIER: In New Hampshire specifically is it more of an issue
BROWN: Yeah we only have one insurance carrier. When she was a governor, she actually changed the law, went from about 26 down to 1. So there's no competition, competition's an issue. And then also, 10 out of the 26 hopsitals are actually outside the network. So yeah, it's a huge issue, people are very very upset about it and they want the ability to hold those responsible accountable.

Scott Brown: Senator Shaheen Is Wrong On Immigration

JACK HEATH: Would you have liked to see the president gone to the border to get update and sort of firsthand on the ground see what’s going on?
SEN. SHAHEEN: You know, Jack, I'm not going to weigh into that. That's a partisan political debate that's happening right now. But I think what's important is that we have a humanitarian crisis on the border with children and families who are fleeing violence in primarily three Central American countries.
HEATH: Right.
SEN. SHAHEEN: And its Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. And that's based on activity that's happening down there, gang activity, drugs activity. So we have immediate problem in trying to address that humanitarian crisis and trying to make sure that those children are taken care of and that we can reintegrate them back into the country where they came from because they have to comply with the law here.
HEATH: Do you think they should be returned then at some point?
SEN. SHAHEEN: I think unless there are -- unless they can show they are refugees from, in danger of immediate threat that, yes, they should be returned. But long-term, we need to fix our immigration system.
BROWN: She’s wrong on immigration. She wants these kids to stay. She’s in favor of the DREAM act, in favor of amnesty. Remember it’s the live free or die state. They want independent leadership where someone is not going to continue to chip away and tear away at our rights and freedoms.
BAIER: You said she wants them to stay?
BROWN: She absolutely wants them to stay.
BAIER: And what do you want?
BROWN: I believe they should be obviously cared for, secure, and they should be put back to their country of origin. We have a system, a mechanism if people are being persecuted that they can go through those channels. But here’s where the problem was, when the president said, oh, by the way, taking these DREAM act kids and putting them ahead of the millions of people who are following our laws and doing the right thing and basically said to the rest of the world, don't worry, just get your kids here and once they get here, they'll be okay. Sending that message out, she supported that effort.

NHDP: Brown’s Valentine’s Day Decision Raises Potential Legal Questions 

Concord, NH – Scott Brown’s announcement on WMUR’s CloseUp that he made a decision to run for the Senate on Valentine’s Day—February 14th, 2014 – raises potential legal questions. The revelation on this morning’s program suggests that he decided to run for office a full five days before he renewed his contract with FOX News and continued cashing in on his lucrative deal as a political pundit.
If Brown did in fact make a decision on February 14th, reports also show that he spent almost a full month dishonestly claiming that he had not in fact made a decision, and skirting FEC regulations that would have triggered filing requirements.
“If Scott Brown really decided to run for New Hampshire’s U.S. Senate seat on Valentine’s Day, that means that he spent the next five weeks not being truthful with New Hampshire voters, and possibly skirted FEC regulations,” said New Hampshire Democratic Party Communications Director Julie McClain. “This revelation raises serious questions that Brown must answer—from Day One, Brown hasn’t been straight with the people of New Hampshire, and this latest news suggests that Brown’s self-serving interests could have resulted in the violation of federal regulations. Scott Brown should come clean.”
Below is a timeline of events:
February 14, 2014: Brown decided to run for New Hampshire’s Senate seat on Valentine’s Day [WMUR, 4/27/14]
February 19, 2014: Scott Brown’s contract with Fox News was renewed [Politico, 2/19/14]. And Fox News typically suspends contracts with contributors after they decide to run for office. [Politico, 4/27/14]
March 3, 2014: Brown claimed he “will make a decision in due time.”  [Union Leader, 3/3/14]
March 3, 2014: Brown claimed Democratic ads attacking him have made him think about getting in the New Hampshire Senate race  [Politico, 3/3/14]
March 3, 2014: Brown told Politico that Democrats “keep running these negative ads and crushing my integrity and distorting my votes and the like — almost antagonizing me, challenging me to get in,’ Brown told POLITICO. ‘Had they left me alone, I may feel a bit different. But they didn’t.’” [Politico, 3/3/14]
March 4, 2014: Greta Van Susteren tweeted that Scott Brown was running in New Hampshire, which Brown immediately called untrue [Politico, 3/4/14]
March 10, 2014: Brown told a guest of his at an upcoming GOP dinner that he was "leaning" towards running.  [The Hill, 3/10/14]
March 14, 2014: Brown Launches Senate Bid and his contract with Fox News is terminated.  [Washington Post, “Post Politics” Blog, 3/14/14] [Fox News,3/14/14]
March 21, 2014: Brown filed his statement of candidacy with the FEC. [FEC, Scott Brown Statement of Candidacy, Filed 3/21/14]


ALG's Daily Grind - Fox News and Republican electoral gains cited in 2010 FCC study


Media content monitoring modus operandi at agency.

Feb. 27, 2014, Fairfax, Va.—An Americans for Limited Government review of prior Federal Communications Commission (FCC) studies on media ownership has revealed that media content monitoring is a regular practice at the agency, with one 2010 study even citing Fox News and its impact on Republican electoral gains in selected districts.

"FCC Media Study No. 9: A Theoretical Analysis of the Impact of Local Market Structure on the Range of Viewpoints Supplied," published by the agency in 2011 authored by Isabelle Brocas, Juan D. Carrillo, and Simon Wilkie in its literature review referenced a 2006 study, "The Fox News Effect" on the political, electoral impact of Fox News in certain regions.

The 2010 FCC study summarized the findings: "indeed there is an impact of the Fox News introduction resulting in a somewhat higher vote for the Republican candidates than would be expected."

Overall the agency considered how media ownership shapes content and in turn political outcomes: "the ownership of media outlets matters viz-a-viz viewpoint, and that the informational content of a media market can have an effect on how people make decisions such as choosing whether or not to vote and, when they do, who to vote for."

"Why is the FCC concerned with how media ownership shapes political outcomes, voting behavior, and viewpoint diversity?" asked Americans for Limited Government President Nathan Mehrens.

The FCC study's literature review referenced another report that found that Washington Post subscribers were 8 percent more likely to vote for the Democrat candidate for governor than Washington Times subscribers.

"We conclude the FCC has as a powerful interest in examining the relationship between ownership structure and market performance, in terms of the efficiency of transmission of information and the diversity of viewpoints in the market," the report stated.

Mehrens questioned the agency's mission on its face: "With its long history of monitoring media content and its recent foray into newsrooms, it is time for Congress to finally put an end to the FCC's content evaluation programs and viewpoint diversity mission. The federal government has no business in trying to dictate diversity in the 21st Century media environment that includes traditional and new media sources that were never imagined when the agency was formed."

"The FCC is supposed to sell spectrum and they should stick to that," he added, concluding, "With satellite, Internet and streaming technologies, and the ability to transmit today practically limitless, a monopoly on the dissemination of ideas is impossible. The original justification for the agency is now antiquated. There is no legitimate government interest in monitoring media content and viewpoint diversity to control media ownership."

Of the ten such studies on media ownership that were issued in 2010 by the FCC, at least six looked directly at content or content-based metrics, market preferences, the prevalence of programming for minorities, the implications of national news coverage versus local, and other criteria in determining whether stations were viewpoint diverse enough.

Similar studies were conducted in 2006, and every four years before that.

Every four years the FCC is required to produce "limits on the number of broadcast stations (radio and TV) an entity can own, as well as limits on the common ownership of broadcast stations and newspapers… [and] to determine whether the rules are in the public interest and to repeal or modify any regulation it determines does not meet this criteria," according to the agency's website.

In that context, the agency regularly conducts studies on media ownership and how it affects viewpoint diversity. The 2014 review will not be completed until next year.

To view online:


"Why did the FCC pull its multi-market study monitoring newsroom content?" By ALG Senior Editor Robert Romano, Feb. 27, 2014, at


Americans for Limited Government is a non-partisan, nationwide network committed to advancing free market reforms, private property rights and core American liberties. For more information on ALG please visit our website at



Shaheen For US Senate - Fox News 


The drumbeat of extreme right-wing support for Massachusetts’ Scott Brown is picking up – Rush Limbaugh devoted time to attacking Jeanne on his nationally syndicated show. 

The signs of a national GOP campaign to defeat Jeanne are unmistakable. They know winning New Hampshire means winning the Senate.

Brown is being paid as a Fox News contributor to attack Jeanne. A Wall Street-funded Super PAC is polling and airing attacks. And Limbaugh is urging Republicans to air an attack ad by the maker of the infamous Willie Horton ad. 

To win, we have to respond immediately.

That’s why this deadline – three days away – is so important. It’s our last chance to show we won’t let them waltz in here and win. Give, RIGHT NOW, by the December 31 FEC deadline to help us raise $14,250 more to defeat Brown and the GOP.

Click here to donate $5 or more right away to help us fight back against the right wing. They’re all after Jeanne and we’ve not a moment to waste.

This is what we’re up against: Rush, Wall Street and Fox News.

If we’re going to fight back against their extreme attacks and defend the Democratic Senate majority, we need you. Now.

Thank you so much, 

Kari Thurman
Friends of Jeanne Shaheen


ALG's Daily Grind - Megyn Kelly targeted by left 


Dec. 14, 2013

Megyn Kelly targeted by left
Megyn Kelly poses a legitimate threat to the left and will be targeted accordingly by their media establishment. The faux "Santa is White" controversy is only the beginning.

How the progressive tax fosters crony capitalism and class warfare
The Sixteenth Amendment and the progressive tax code, with it penchant for wealth redistribution, has fundamentally altered government's relationship with its citizens and ought to be divorced for the health of the republic.

Did the Pope attack 'unfettered capitalism'?
Reuters: "Pope Francis attacked unfettered capitalism as 'a new tyranny.'" But did he actually write that?

The Ryan budget fraud is even worse after you read it
CBO: A $63.2 billion proposed increase in spending canceling almost 35 percent of the sequester cuts scheduled for 2014 and 2015 will be offset by just a $6.25 billion cut to spending and a $269 million increase of revenue in those years.

Obamacare manipulation grant sheds light on left's media brainwashing
The University of Southern California has received a $500,000 grant from the California Endowment to promote the failing health care law.