Press Releases

 

Entries in Fox News (39)

Tuesday
Apr292014

NHDP: Brown’s Valentine’s Day Decision Raises Potential Legal Questions 

Concord, NH – Scott Brown’s announcement on WMUR’s CloseUp that he made a decision to run for the Senate on Valentine’s Day—February 14th, 2014 – raises potential legal questions. The revelation on this morning’s program suggests that he decided to run for office a full five days before he renewed his contract with FOX News and continued cashing in on his lucrative deal as a political pundit.
 
If Brown did in fact make a decision on February 14th, reports also show that he spent almost a full month dishonestly claiming that he had not in fact made a decision, and skirting FEC regulations that would have triggered filing requirements.
 
“If Scott Brown really decided to run for New Hampshire’s U.S. Senate seat on Valentine’s Day, that means that he spent the next five weeks not being truthful with New Hampshire voters, and possibly skirted FEC regulations,” said New Hampshire Democratic Party Communications Director Julie McClain. “This revelation raises serious questions that Brown must answer—from Day One, Brown hasn’t been straight with the people of New Hampshire, and this latest news suggests that Brown’s self-serving interests could have resulted in the violation of federal regulations. Scott Brown should come clean.”
 
Below is a timeline of events:
February 14, 2014: Brown decided to run for New Hampshire’s Senate seat on Valentine’s Day [WMUR, 4/27/14]
February 19, 2014: Scott Brown’s contract with Fox News was renewed [Politico, 2/19/14]. And Fox News typically suspends contracts with contributors after they decide to run for office. [Politico, 4/27/14]
March 3, 2014: Brown claimed he “will make a decision in due time.”  [Union Leader, 3/3/14]
March 3, 2014: Brown claimed Democratic ads attacking him have made him think about getting in the New Hampshire Senate race  [Politico, 3/3/14]
March 3, 2014: Brown told Politico that Democrats “keep running these negative ads and crushing my integrity and distorting my votes and the like — almost antagonizing me, challenging me to get in,’ Brown told POLITICO. ‘Had they left me alone, I may feel a bit different. But they didn’t.’” [Politico, 3/3/14]
March 4, 2014: Greta Van Susteren tweeted that Scott Brown was running in New Hampshire, which Brown immediately called untrue [Politico, 3/4/14]
March 10, 2014: Brown told a guest of his at an upcoming GOP dinner that he was "leaning" towards running.  [The Hill, 3/10/14]
March 14, 2014: Brown Launches Senate Bid and his contract with Fox News is terminated.  [Washington Post, “Post Politics” Blog, 3/14/14] [Fox News,3/14/14]
March 21, 2014: Brown filed his statement of candidacy with the FEC. [FEC, Scott Brown Statement of Candidacy, Filed 3/21/14]

Friday
Feb282014

ALG's Daily Grind - Fox News and Republican electoral gains cited in 2010 FCC study

6

Media content monitoring modus operandi at agency.

Feb. 27, 2014, Fairfax, Va.—An Americans for Limited Government review of prior Federal Communications Commission (FCC) studies on media ownership has revealed that media content monitoring is a regular practice at the agency, with one 2010 study even citing Fox News and its impact on Republican electoral gains in selected districts.

"FCC Media Study No. 9: A Theoretical Analysis of the Impact of Local Market Structure on the Range of Viewpoints Supplied," published by the agency in 2011 authored by Isabelle Brocas, Juan D. Carrillo, and Simon Wilkie in its literature review referenced a 2006 study, "The Fox News Effect" on the political, electoral impact of Fox News in certain regions.

The 2010 FCC study summarized the findings: "indeed there is an impact of the Fox News introduction resulting in a somewhat higher vote for the Republican candidates than would be expected."

Overall the agency considered how media ownership shapes content and in turn political outcomes: "the ownership of media outlets matters viz-a-viz viewpoint, and that the informational content of a media market can have an effect on how people make decisions such as choosing whether or not to vote and, when they do, who to vote for."

"Why is the FCC concerned with how media ownership shapes political outcomes, voting behavior, and viewpoint diversity?" asked Americans for Limited Government President Nathan Mehrens.

The FCC study's literature review referenced another report that found that Washington Post subscribers were 8 percent more likely to vote for the Democrat candidate for governor than Washington Times subscribers.

"We conclude the FCC has as a powerful interest in examining the relationship between ownership structure and market performance, in terms of the efficiency of transmission of information and the diversity of viewpoints in the market," the report stated.

Mehrens questioned the agency's mission on its face: "With its long history of monitoring media content and its recent foray into newsrooms, it is time for Congress to finally put an end to the FCC's content evaluation programs and viewpoint diversity mission. The federal government has no business in trying to dictate diversity in the 21st Century media environment that includes traditional and new media sources that were never imagined when the agency was formed."

"The FCC is supposed to sell spectrum and they should stick to that," he added, concluding, "With satellite, Internet and streaming technologies, and the ability to transmit today practically limitless, a monopoly on the dissemination of ideas is impossible. The original justification for the agency is now antiquated. There is no legitimate government interest in monitoring media content and viewpoint diversity to control media ownership."

Of the ten such studies on media ownership that were issued in 2010 by the FCC, at least six looked directly at content or content-based metrics, market preferences, the prevalence of programming for minorities, the implications of national news coverage versus local, and other criteria in determining whether stations were viewpoint diverse enough.

Similar studies were conducted in 2006, and every four years before that.

Every four years the FCC is required to produce "limits on the number of broadcast stations (radio and TV) an entity can own, as well as limits on the common ownership of broadcast stations and newspapers… [and] to determine whether the rules are in the public interest and to repeal or modify any regulation it determines does not meet this criteria," according to the agency's website.

In that context, the agency regularly conducts studies on media ownership and how it affects viewpoint diversity. The 2014 review will not be completed until next year.

To view online: http://getliberty.org/fox-news-and-republican-electoral-gains-cited-in-2010-fcc-study/

Attachments:

"Why did the FCC pull its multi-market study monitoring newsroom content?" By ALG Senior Editor Robert Romano, Feb. 27, 2014, at http://netrightdaily.com/2014/02/fcc-pull-multi-market-study-monitoring-newsroom-content/

### 

Americans for Limited Government is a non-partisan, nationwide network committed to advancing free market reforms, private property rights and core American liberties. For more information on ALG please visit our website at www.GetLiberty.org.

 

Monday
Dec302013

Shaheen For US Senate - Fox News 

Friends,

The drumbeat of extreme right-wing support for Massachusetts’ Scott Brown is picking up – Rush Limbaugh devoted time to attacking Jeanne on his nationally syndicated show. 

The signs of a national GOP campaign to defeat Jeanne are unmistakable. They know winning New Hampshire means winning the Senate.

Brown is being paid as a Fox News contributor to attack Jeanne. A Wall Street-funded Super PAC is polling and airing attacks. And Limbaugh is urging Republicans to air an attack ad by the maker of the infamous Willie Horton ad. 

To win, we have to respond immediately.

That’s why this deadline – three days away – is so important. It’s our last chance to show we won’t let them waltz in here and win. Give, RIGHT NOW, by the December 31 FEC deadline to help us raise $14,250 more to defeat Brown and the GOP.

Click here to donate $5 or more right away to help us fight back against the right wing. They’re all after Jeanne and we’ve not a moment to waste.

This is what we’re up against: Rush, Wall Street and Fox News.

If we’re going to fight back against their extreme attacks and defend the Democratic Senate majority, we need you. Now.

Thank you so much, 

Kari Thurman
Friends of Jeanne Shaheen

Sunday
Dec152013

ALG's Daily Grind - Megyn Kelly targeted by left 

6

Dec. 14, 2013

Megyn Kelly targeted by left
Megyn Kelly poses a legitimate threat to the left and will be targeted accordingly by their media establishment. The faux "Santa is White" controversy is only the beginning.

How the progressive tax fosters crony capitalism and class warfare
The Sixteenth Amendment and the progressive tax code, with it penchant for wealth redistribution, has fundamentally altered government's relationship with its citizens and ought to be divorced for the health of the republic.

Did the Pope attack 'unfettered capitalism'?
Reuters: "Pope Francis attacked unfettered capitalism as 'a new tyranny.'" But did he actually write that?

The Ryan budget fraud is even worse after you read it
CBO: A $63.2 billion proposed increase in spending canceling almost 35 percent of the sequester cuts scheduled for 2014 and 2015 will be offset by just a $6.25 billion cut to spending and a $269 million increase of revenue in those years.

Obamacare manipulation grant sheds light on left's media brainwashing
The University of Southern California has received a $500,000 grant from the California Endowment to promote the failing health care law.

Saturday
Nov022013

AmericanPrinciplesProject - Lehrman talks gold on Cavuto 

Dear Monetary Policy Observer,

On Tuesday, Lewis E. Lehrman appeared on Fox Business' Neil Cavuto to discuss the prospects for gold.
The discussion covered the future of gold's existence as a commodity and also looked at the effects leaving the gold standard had on US federal spending and debt.  Lehrman also discussed the obstacles the US would face if it returned to a gold standard. 
We hope you find this material of interest.