NHDP - Why are Ovide and Smith Appearing with the John Birch Society?

GOP Gubernatorial Candidates Should Explain Their Appearance with John Birch Society Chairman

CONCORD - Republican gubernatorial candidates Ovide Lamontagne and Kevin Smith showed once again this weekend that their allegiance is not to the people of the Granite State but to radical groups like the Tea Party and the John Birch Society.

Both Smith and Lamontagne shared a stage this weekend at a Tea Party rally with Hal Shurtleff, who the organizers of the event list as a chair of the John Birch Society.

"We already know that Lamontagne and Smith stand in lock-step with Bill O'Brien and the Tea Party, but now are they standing with the even more radical John Birch Society?" Said Collin Gately, a spokesperson for the New Hampshire Democratic Party.

"Do Ovide and Kevin believe, like the John Birch Society does, that 'it's the UN's plan to establish control over all human activity' and that we should withdraw from and abolish that organization?" said Gately.

The John Birch Society has long been considered a fringe organization, even by Republicans. For example, the Birch Society accused President Dwight Eisenhower of being a communist. They were also known for their opposition to civil rights legislation.

Now, however, the John Birch Society is writing bills for the New Hampshire legislature under Bill O'Brien.

"Why would Ovide Lamontagne and Kevin Smith proudly stand with the John Birch Society?" Gately said. "They need to explain to the people of New Hampshire their appearance and whether they support the John Birch Society's radical agenda."

In March of 2011, the John Birch Society took credit for two resolutions that came out of the New Hampshire legislature: one advocating the withdrawal from the North American Free Trade Agreement and another urging the U.S. to withdraw from the UN.  According to the Concord Monitor, when both bills passed the House, the John Birch Society sent a press release claiming that "both resolutions were drafted by the John Birch Society."

Abolishing the UN?  Conspiracy theories? Ovide Lamontagne and Kevin Smith owe the voters of New Hampshire an explanation.  Will they work for New Hampshire to promote job growth and the economy, or will they work for the Tea Party and the John Birch Society, promoting their radical ideas while ignoring Granite Staters?

John Birch Society: http://www.jbs.org/issues-pages/agenda-21, http://www.jbs.org/issues-pages/united-nations

Concord Monitor: http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/246608/john-birch-society-claims-legislation

Event Program: http://www.nhteapartycoalition.org/tea/2012/03/27/tea-party-2012-april-15/

NEMW - Census Workers Now Engaging In Unlawful Activity

Consider this:

With the construction of the microwave weapons that they've used in Iraq to fry bus loads of people, to this GPS census run, to satellite pictures of everywhere on Earth.... What if SDI, or what Ronald Reagan called, Star Wars, is really an over-arching project to capture the entire population of the world in a high tech space based web? What if they intend to use space-based weapons platforms to 'neutralize' all enemies? Using microwave and pulse weapons via computer control from space would render armies obsolete. We know that they have been using this kind of satellite enhanced mission control since the first Gulf War and perfecting it ever since. The war-mongering Right among us have unthinkingly applauded, thinking this was to benefit their own country. The naive Left among us have allowed our leaders to destroy our natural desire to retain oursovereignty.

My friends, we have foolishly wrought our own destruction by willingly and willfully disobeying the Constitution from both 'sides' and misreading the warnings put forth in the Bible and other Holy Scriptures. Technology has given those that desire dominance the tools they need to achieve their objective.

Editor NEMW

CENSUS WORKERS NOW ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY GPS Marking of Every House in U.S. Not Authorized by Supreme Law of the Land
By: David Deschesne,
Editor/Publisher, Fort Fairfield Journal May 6, 2009, page 1

The U.S. Census Bureau has been overstepping the U.S. Constitution’s requirements for a simple enumeration of the citizens for years, but their current plans to mark the GPS location of every address in the U.S. is just the latest in a long list of usurpations of the General Government’s Constitutional authority.

The Bureau of Census is sending its army of workers to every address in the United States within the next couple of months in order to log the Global Positioning System (GPS) location of every American citizen’s home.

Cataloging the physical location of people’s homes is far removed from the Constitutional grant of authority to the government to merely count how many people are living in the several states in order to assign an appropriate number of Representatives to them in the U.S. House ofRepresentatives1 so, there must be another purpose for this action.

The term “Census” is Latin for to appraise or to assess a value thereon. In Roman history it was a registration or count of citizens and their property to determine taxation."2

The spirit of the word ‘Census,’ as to appraise or assess a value on the citizens’ labor and their property, does not appear anywhere in the U.S. Constitution, only an enumeration (counting) of people every ten years in order to appropriate Representatives.

The Bureau of Census is a relatively new creation, not actually in existence in the beginning of the United States. It was established temporarily in 1899 and as a permanent office within the Department of Interior in 1902, just a few years prior to our nation surrendering its money supply to a private cabal of international banks. In 1903, the Bureau of Census - now functioning as a de facto “Bureau of Appraisals” was absorbed by the newly created Department of Commerce and Labor, which was later separated into two separate departments. The Bureau of Census (Appraisals) was reorganized in 1950 and remains in the Commerce Department to this day.3

Congress created the Bureau of Census (Appraisals) to begin the laborious task of cataloging, serial numbering and tracking the value of all personal and business property in the United States, as well as the humans therein for the purposes of appraising their value and preparing them for use as collateral against the nation’s debt under a proposed fiat debt money scheme to be implemented later on in 1913.

Ten years after its inception, the Department of Commerce was restructured as a stand-alone entity separating Labor into its own Department (15 USC 1501). The private, for-profit corporation, known as the Federal Reserve System was formed in the same year as the restructuring of the Department of Commerce. Under the new Federal Reserve System's plan, all new money would be brought into existence via loans to the government and citizens. The Bureau of Census (Appraisals), as a division of the Department of Commerce, is charged with keeping track of the number of human chattels whose labor is pledged against the national debt via the Federal income tax. The Bureau of Census (Appraisals) also appraises and keeps track of manufacturers, mineral industries, distributive trades, construction industries, agriculture, religious organizations and transportation. All towns, cities, and municipalities are required to annually submit a report of all new construction, multi-family units, new businesses, and any losses to the Bureau of Census (Appraisals) for the purposes of keeping a current valuation of all property in the United States.4

Just prior to the bankruptcy of the United States in June, 1933, the Bureau of Census (Appraisals) undertook a bold new venture. During the month of April, 1930, over 100,000 persons were engaged in taking the census. At that time the usual questions regarding race, color, sex, age, occupation, whether married or single, and whether able to write were asked. In addition were such questions as the value of your home and whether owned or rented, whether you were the owner of a radio, and detailed questions regarding unemployment.5 This information was needed in order to assess a value on the chattels and collateral the Federal Reserve banks needed before loaning money to the soon to be bankrupt U.S. government.

The Under Secretary for Economic Affairs compiles all Census data and makes it available to those who are in need of it - such as banks seeking to determine how well a state or geographic area of people are able to collateralize a bond issue (loan) with their currently existing labor and property.

The current scheme of using unwitting census workers to mark the GPS location of every address in the United States, under the banner of a Constitutional enumeration of the citizens, has nothing to do with counting people in order to appropriate Representatives to Congress. Instead, it appears to be an unconstitutional ploy to catalog and track all citizens’ property which has been pledged to the banks and creditors who hold the notes on the United States’ now $11+ trillion national debt.

“We are using the GPS data to help our census takers find your home when they come around next year,” said one census worker. However, when asked since she was able to find the person’s house without a GPS coordinate to begin with, why was a GPS coordinate necessary for another census worker, she was unable to explain.

Some have speculated that the GPS coordinates are for the Federal Government’s future use in silencing protestors, confiscating firearms or foreclosing on homes on behalf of the foreign banks and countries who have loaned the U.S. trillions of dollars in unpayable debt. Whatever this government’s intentions are, history has shown they are not benevolent.

The Fort Fairfield Journal contacted Paul Powell, Partnership Coordinator for the Boston Regional Census Center to ask what Constitutional authority the Bureau of Census had to catalog GPS coordinates, what the information was being used for, what other information was being collected about the address at the time the GPS coordinates were taken, and what steps the Bureau of Census was taking to protect the privacy of those who chose not to allow their home to be cataloged as such. Mr. Powell acknowledged receiving the questions, but refused to comment or provide answers.

While the Bureau of Census (Appraisals) may have enacting legislation to grant its authority by fiat, the U.S. Constitution has granted no power to the Federal government to do anything other than count people, with respect to the Census. Therefore, the Census workers’ cataloging the GPS positions of every home address in the U.S. is blatantly unlawful activity initiated on behalf of the private banking industry now running Congress. According to the 10th amendment, any power not granted to the Federal government, or prohibited by the Constitution to the States, is reserved to the States or the people respectively.

Notes
1. see U.S. Const., Article 1, Sec. 1, Clause 3.
2. World Book Dictionary/Thorndike Barnhart; 1969 ed. ©1969 Doubleday & Company Inc., p. 333.
3. U.S. Government Manual 2000-2001, p. 608
4. op. cit., p. 137
5. see MacGruder's American Government, ©1939 Allyn and Bacon, pp. 285-286.

-----------------

Best Regards,

David Baillie

New England MediaWatch

email: editor@nemw.net

http://www.nemw.net

NEMW - Alert: EU wants 'Internet G12' to govern cyberspace

If you haven't figured it out yet, especially the "Liberals" among you, all of the Western nations, particularly the English-speaking ones, which have supposedly stood as bulwarks against fascism, Nazism, Communism, etc, are ALL coordinating totalitarian laws based on the fraud of 9/11 to bring in a total clampdowns on their populations. They are all lining up the very same LAWS, which align with the EU laws, which harken back to the Soviet system. This circumvents the US Constitution and the rights of the individual secured therein. Just look through my archives for plenty of articles I have found on these subjects. Now consider the Hate Speech law already passed in the House and in the Senate Judiciary Committee,as well as this recent statement by Rupert Murdochand the article on this page.

If the US were to give up its 'governance' of the Net, under the protection of the Constitution to a world governance body, the Net will have to comply with foreign laws. Dissent will NOT be allowed on the Net. Any websites that go against 'acceptable' dissemination of information will be banned. Questioning the Holocaust will be a crime EVERYWHERE, questioning what the Israelis do in Palestine to its indigenous population will be CRIMINAL, questioning why the Israelis have hundreds of nuclear weapons will not be allowed. And those are only my favorite pet peeves. How about questioning 9/11? Or the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the escalation in Pakistan and the constant drumming for war with Iran?

Folks, you had BETTER wake yourself and your friends up. This is no joke, it is not a drill. They are making their move NOW.I suggest listening carefully to this program by Alan Watt. The last half hour pertains to this topic specifically.

Editor NEMW

EU wants 'Internet G12' to govern cyberspace
By Leigh Phillips

Global Research, May 8, 2009
EU Observer - 2009-05-05

The European Commission wants the US to dissolve all government links with the body that 'governs' the internet, replacing it with an international forum for discussing internet governance and online security.

The rules and decisions on key internet governance issues, such as the creation of top level domains (such as .com and .eu) and managing the internet address system that ensures computers can connect to each other, are currently made by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), a private, not-for profit corporation based in California which operates under an agreement with the US Department of Commerce.

The decisions made by ICANN affect the way the internet works all around the world.

EU information society commissioner Viviane Reding on Monday (4 May) suggested a new model for overseeing the internet from October this year, when the Commerce Department agreement runs out.

She called on US President Barack Obama to fully privatize ICANN and set up an independent judicial body, described as a "G12 for internet governance," which she described as a "multilateral forum for governments to discuss general internet governance policy and security issues."

"I trust that President Obama will have the courage, the wisdom and the respect for the global nature of the internet to pave the way in September for a new, more accountable, more transparent, more democratic and more multilateral form of Internet Governance," she said via a video message posted on her commission website.

The expiry of the agreement between ICANN and the US government "opens the door for the full privatization of ICANN, and it also raises the question of to whom ICANN should be accountable," she said.

"In the long run, it is not defendable that the government department of only one country has oversight of an internet function which is used by hundreds of millions of people in countries all over the world."

Instead, Brussels would prefer that an international government forum that to meet twice a year makes recommendations by majority vote to the newly privatized ICANN. The forum would be restricted to representatives from 12 countries, with a regional balance taken into consideration.

Her "Internet G12" would include two representatives each from North America, South America, Europe and Africa, three representatives from Asia and Australia, as well as the Chairman of ICANN as a non-voting member. International organizations with competences in this field meanwhile could be given observer status.

The new US administration's position on global internet governance is not yet clear. However, during the Bush administration, Washington was steadfastly opposed to handing ICANN over to the United Nations.

The commission will hold a conference on Wednesday (6 May) in Brussels to discuss the issue with Europe's internet community.