Advertising

 

Search NH Blogs

BlogNetNews.com

Press Releases

Entries in Judical Activism (18)

Thursday
19Nov2009

ALG Blasts 10 Republican Senators for Blocking Filibuster Against 7th Circuit Appeals Court Nominee Hamilton 

"Actions have consequences.  And one result of this action

will be to further separate the GOP from its own base—74

percent of whom already say their leadership in Congress

is out of touch."ALG President Bill Wilson.

November 18th, 2009, Fairfax, VA—Americans for Limited Government President Bill Wilson today condemned 10 Republican Senators for voting to invoke cloture on Barack Obama's controversial nomination of Judge David Hamilton to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.

"These 10 Republican Senators have cleared the way for the confirmation of David Hamilton, who has used his seat as District Court Judge to suppress religious freedom, protect child predators, and rule leniently against career criminals," said Wilson.

"These 10 Senators are out of step with the American people, who believe in the rule of law and do not want laws ignored by ACLU factotums who legislate from the bench," Wilson added.  "America is a society of laws, and David Hamilton, who represents the judicial oligarchy in America that rules by fiat, will help bring an end to the rule of law."

Yesterday, the Senate voted 70-29 to invoke cloture on Hamilton, making a confirmation vote all but certain.  Voting with Senate Democrats were Senators Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, John Cornyn of Texas, Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, Orrin Hatch of Utah, Richard Lugar of Indiana, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and John Thune of South Dakota.

A coalition letter from 24 conservative leaders that Wilson signed to the Senate urged all members to filibuster Hamilton.  The letter stated that "Judge Hamilton fails to meet the qualifications for the high office to which he has been nominated, and his record demonstrates that he would decide cases on the basis of his politics and personal agenda instead of the Constitution."

According to the letter, Judge Hamilton has ruled "that prayers to Jesus Christ offered at the beginning of legislative sessions violate the Constitution, but that prayers to Allah do not", chose to follow mandatory sentencing guidelines, overturned a sex offender registry law, and had "urged the President to grant clemency for a police officer who had pled guilty to producing child pornography".

The coalition letter said Hamilton's record working for the American Civil Liberties Union and as a fundraiser for ACORN "was not enough to qualify him for the lower court and nothing in his record on that court suggests he is qualified for a promotion." When originally nominated to the U.S. District Court by President Clinton, Hamilton was rated "not qualified" by the American Bar Association. 

In a recent speech to the Federalist Society, Senator Jeff Sessions, who led the filibuster effort against Hamilton in the Senate, quoted Hamilton as saying a judge's job is to "write footnotes to the Constitution" and has argued that judges "need to empathize" with the parties of cases.

"Every election cycle," Wilson said, "Republican candidates for Senate state their commitment to bringing judges to the federal bench who will help restore the role of constitutionally limited government in American jurisprudence.  Instead, Republican and conservative constituents have been betrayed by their own Senators."

"Why should anyone care if there is ever a Republican majority again if this is the type of vote Republican Senators cast?" Wilson asked, citing a recent Rasmussen Reports poll that stated, "74% of Republicans say their party's representatives in Congress have lost touch with GOP voters nationwide over the past several years."

"Actions have consequences," Wilson added, concluding, "And one result of this action will be to further separate the GOP from its own base—74 percent of whom already say their leadership in Congress is out of touch."

Tuesday
14Jul2009

NetRight Daily: Sotomayor and "Webolutions" 

Sotomayor in Review: The Senate Judiciary Committee today opens hearings on the most radical Supreme Court nominee in memory. Despite her compelling story of personal accomplishment, Judge Sonia Sotomayor has proved by her own words and actions that she is unfit for the nation's highest court. (H/T Washington Times)

 

Honduras and Iran: How the Web Can Control Government: Over the last couple of weeks, an interesting phenomenon has developed across the globe. People have been using social networking on the internet to rise up against oppressive governments and steer the direction of debate. Sites like Twitter and Facebook have become powerful tools in this fight.

 

Be sure to follow us on Twitter!

 

Tuesday
14Jul2009

CHQ - All Issues at Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings Boil Down To One 

RICHARD A. VIGURIE: All Issues at Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings Boil Down To One
Viguerie News Releases - ConservativeHQ.com Chairman Richard Viguerie says in this hard-hitting press release that the "views of judicial power shared by Obama and Sotomayor are inconsistent with the Constitution itself, and that should disqualify this nominee." Viguerie goes on to say that recent comments from Obama adviser David Axelrod are "a shocking admission of Obama's views, which go beyond judicial activism and undermine our constitutional structure based in separation of limited, enumerated powers." [read the full release here]

 

Other Articles in News From The Front:

Obama's Climate of Fear

No Jackboots, Just Nanny State Spoon-Feeding

Burt Prelutsky: I'm Mad as Hell!

Five Traps That Trick Americans Into Accepting Socialized Medicine

All of these articles and many others can be accessed through http://conservativehq.com.

Tuesday
14Jul2009

Heritage Resources for the Sotomayor Hearings 

As Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor answers questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week, we wanted to provide you with a quick rundown of the key Heritage research on the nomination.

 

Heritage’s Sotomayor Nomination “Rapid Response” Page: http://www.heritage.org/news/us-supreme-court-vacancy.cfm

 

Heritage’s NEW “Order in the Court” Page on Judicial Activism: http://www.orderinthecourt.org/

 

Heritage is conducting a Tele-Townhall on the Sotomayor nomination on Tuesday, July 14th at 6:00 pm Eastern with Senator Jim DeMint and former Attorney General Edwin Meese. Click here to Register

 

 

Quick Links to Heritage Research and Commentary

 

Questions for Judge Sotomayor on the Use of Foreign and International Law

http://www.heritage.org/Research/LegalIssues/wm2525.cfm

 

Sotomayor's Full Court Press

http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed071309a.cfm

 

Key Questions for Sonia Sotomayor

http://www.heritage.org/Research/LegalIssues/wm2534.cfm

 

Sotomayor and racial identity politics

http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed063009b.cfm

 

Bad On Guns

http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed060409c.cfm

 

 

Foundry Blog

 

The Heritage team will be commenting extensively as the Sotomayor hearings unfold this week on our Foundry Blog. Be sure to check back for our live blogging throughout the week.

 

The Judicial Oath vs Sonia Sotomayor

Sotomayor’s Activist Cases: The 11-Word Dismissal of the Second Amendment

The Supreme Court vs. Sotomayor

 

 

Don’t Forget to Register!

 

 

Tuesday
14Jul2009

DSCC - Tausch is against Sotomayor 

Tausch is against Sotomayor
Monday, July 13 2009 05:05 PM
Press Release
http://www.nhpoliticalreport.com/press-releases/313-tausch-is-against-sotomayor

CONCORD, NH STEWARD of Prosperity founder Fred Tausch, of Merrimack, released the following statement today as the Senate Judiciary Committee launches hearings on the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court:

"Chief Justice John Roberts opened his confirmation hearings by saying that a judge should act like anumpireapplying rules but not making them. Senators must bear that in mind as they examine and evaluate Judge Sotomayor's long record of judicial activism. With the nation's highest court having reversed her reasoning in six out of seven opportunities, Committee members will be hard-pressed to deny that she doesn't inject her personal views into her rulings.

"Senators have a solemn 'advice and consent'dutythat charges them with the important job of evaluating the President's judicial nominees. If their intention is to put the Constitution first and protect the Supreme Court from becoming an extra-legislative body, they will reject Judge Sotomayor's nomination."