Press Releases


Entries in Lawsuit (65)









What: On Tuesday, September 29, a lawsuit will be filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia charging that the exclusion of qualified candidates from the general election presidential debates by the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) violates federal anti-trust laws.


When: 10:30 a.m., Tuesday, September 29, 2015


Where: United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 400 Constitution Avenue NW, DC.


Who:  Bruce Fein, attorney representing the plaintiffs, will file the complaint, and will be available for interviews with the media outside the Courthouse.


Plaintiffs are: 2012 Libertarian presidential nominee Gary Johnson; Jim Gray, 2012 Libertarian vice-presidential nominee; Jill Stein, 2012 Green Party presidential nominee; Cheri Honkala, 2012 Green Party vice-presidential nominee; the Libertarian National Committee, and the Green Party of the United States.


About: The lawsuit challenging the exclusion of candidates from CPD-sponsored debates is backed by the Our America Initiative, a not-for-profit advocacy organization, through the Fair Debates project, Former New Mexico Governor and 2012 presidential candidate Gary Johnson is the Honorary Chairman of the Our America Initiative.


VRC - Court case Sept 28 public welcome 

September 24, 2015

Strafford, DD                                                                                                            Superior Court

                                                State of New Hampshire


                                                Town of Lee (TOL)


                                                Veteran Resort-Chapel (VRC)

                        101 Stepping Stone Rd Lee NH 03861 P# 603-781-3839

Case No: 219-2014-CV-00220


                                                Motion for Summary Judgment


            Now Comes the VRC represented by Peter Macdonald Minister, Sgt USMC and 100% disabled as so been Known by this court and TOL.  The Constitution, Court Rulings and the RLUIPA law of 2000 place the rights and religious believes of the individual above the right for a town government to not only use zoning to stop unwanted religious beliefs in the TOL but to knowingly inflict harm on individuals (in this case Combat U.S. Military Veterans) to stop these U.S. citizens from living in Lee NH on church grounds.  The purpose of any court is to protect the individuals against government dominance as in this case it would appear a special class of Lee residents are using zoning and the power of government to keep homeless U.S. Military Veterans from their neighborhoods.  Discrimination in this case is so rampart as the TOL uses discrimination against the VRC to single us out as a means to inflict hardship and win by attrition.  As follows;


1.  That the TOL zoning ordinance discriminates against churches as Article V Residential zone A. Permitted uses line 5 singles out churches to be approved by the Planning Board site review.  St. Benedict Center V. town of Richmond et, al, (NH Superior Ct 10/23/0 “Houses of worship are not directly allowed in any of the Town’s zoning districts without a special exception. Which restricts right to religious speech, assembly, and practice”.  “The court found this persuasive because it gave the board excessive power”


2.  That the VRC is a church or religious assembly since 1980 and is protected by our Constitution Part First, our U.S. Constitution and many rulings of the U.S. SC and NH SC.  

          a.  The TOL has a copy of my Minister document recorded in Strafford County                       Deed of records 1980 when my ministry began and has continued many                           days of the week since 1980 with services held at the living places of                                         homeless veterans around the state of NH

         b.  The VRC is registered with the U.S. Federal Government as a 501-c-3 with                           the mission from God to help homeless U.S. Military Veterans.   The TOL has                           a copy of the VRC 501-c-3            

         c.  The VRC is registered with the NH Secretary of State as a non-Profit Church                           with the mission from God to help homeless U.S. Military homeless veterans

3.  That the facts of this case will support the statement by the Lee Selectmen that “We are a community of Professors and UNH support staff and we do not deserve homeless in our neighborhoods”.

            a.  That the Lee Selectmen refuse to recognize the VRC as we have applied to                               the selectmen many times for such approval.  8/18.15 is the most recent                              denial

            b.  That the Lee zoning board has denied the VRC many times

            c.  Lee site review before making a decision keeps running up our expenses in                  a needless manner to win by what appears to be attrition.

            d. TOL has denied Tax-exempt Status for the Veteran Resort-Chapel once again in a manner that is not consistent with NH laws, RSA and practices.  TOL are quoted, as we do not meet the four-part test by Elder Trust of Florida, Inc V Town of Epsom (NH Supreme Court No. 205-706).  (1) The institution or organization was established and is administered for a charitable purpose:  We the Veteran Resort-Chapel are a 501-c-3 non-profit, registered with the NH secretary of state as a non-profit doing business through our church to help Homeless U.S. Military Veterans with preference going to Combat Veterans.  All money goes to pay the way for these brave men and women.  The Veteran Resort-Chapel owns the property free and clear.  The purpose is totally public for that is where our church members come from.  Our building is open to the public 24/7 as the TOL is well aware of. (2) an obligation exists to perform the organization’s stated purpose to the public rather than simply to members of the organization:  The Veterans Resort-Chapel is made up of the general public as a church and our mission from God to help Homeless U.S. Military Veterans with preference going to Combat Veterans.  Our Chapel is open to the public 24/7 as the town is well aware this winter homeless Veterans walking in Lee NH were directed by the Lee Police during storms that the Chapel door was open for them to seek shelter from the storm.  Two such Homeless Veterans did stay one night each until such storm ended.  Many times a week year round many Veterans and US citizens go to said chapel to pray or what ever.  We have a homeless Veteran living on site, as the TOL is well aware of.  (3) The land, in addition to being owned by the organization, is occupied by it and used directly for the stated charitable purposes; The TOL is well aware because they have a copy of the deed to 101 Stepping Stone Rd and it was given free and clear by Peter and Agnes Macdonald to the VRC for the express purpose to be a church with the mission from God to help homeless U.S. Military Veterans with preference going to Combat Veterans.  The property in question is used for no other purpose, as the TOL is well aware of.  (4) any of the organization’s income or profits are used for any purpose other than the purpose for which the organization was established.   My wife and I have close to if not over four hundred thousand into this mission from God to help Homeless U.S. Military Veterans with preference going to Combat Veterans.  All the money goes to help the Veterans and no other purpose.  Our Tax books are open for public viewing.  For the TOL to make such a false statement with all the facts in the TOL presents demonstrates the discrimination and acts of harm by the TOL in this case.


4.  The TOL is trying to stop the VRC from existence by attrition running up our expenses)

         a.  This frivolous court case.

         b.  Zoning Board expensive

         c.  Refusal of tax-exempt status for a church.

         d.  Needless Site Review expenses

         e.  Constant stop work orders from building inspectors office.


5.  The TOL has knowingly with intent to harm Homeless and /or disabled Combat Veterans has acted in a criminal manner to discriminate against our church and our mission from God to help (mentally and/or physically) homeless U.S. Military veterans come home if at all possible.  We have 25 years of experiences as shown by our ministry.

         a.  The TOL has fined the VRC for having a sign on VRC property          free standing personal property telling our members the “VRC” is          here.  The TOL should have been aware of the Arizona case “Reed          V. Town of Gilbert, Docket No. 13-502 that clearly makes signs on          public streets as described in that case does make signs on          personal property such as the VRC legal.  To go even further          removing the signs placed a “Substantial burden” on our members          taking away our guaranteed constitutional rights to free speech, our          right to quiet enjoyment of our own property and our right to equal          treatment. The TOL never even responded to our request for a          Compelling Government interest or that it is the least restricted          means. 

         b. The TOL interprets the Zoning ordinance different for the VRC                        than other properties in Lee NH.  The TOL agreed if the VRC took              the sign from being readable in the front of the VRC property then                          the TOL would make all other properties in Lee NH do the same                        as so agreed to in the stipulation that the TOL refers to (Line 15).                         The clear act of discrimination to intentionally harm our church by                        the TOL cannot be tolerated.  As follows:

                  1b.  100 Stepping Stone Rd across the street from the VRC                                     property has over 48 Sq feet of signage on his van                                     parked in his driveway 18 hours a day, 7 days a week.                                      The TOL claims signs on the vehicle are                                              exempt, yet signs on a scrap piece of plywood leaning                                     against a flag pole 16 Sq feet giving church members                                     direction on church property are illegal.  The same                                     ordinance interrupted different by the TOL for the VRC                                     than others.  This is discrimination.

                  2b  The same house at 100 Stepping Stone Rd on the front of                                  the house is a sign that the house is Jewish or that they                                  have a child in the  Army.  The same house has a sign                                  visible from the rd by the door of the donkey shed telling of                         the door location.

                  3b  The apartment building a few houses down the street on                                  Stepping Stone Rd has a sign for a business from a                                           different town about 25 Sq feet, less than twenty feet from                                  the rd.

                  4b  The house across the street from this apartment building                                  has a sign about 25 Sq feet, less than 4’ from the rd of a                                  business from a different town.  This same house has a 48                        Sq foot sign of picnic tables made on site and for sale.                                  This same property has a sign at the end of Stepping                                 Stone Rd less than 5’ from Rt 125 telling the public of its                                 business location.

                  5b  Allen’s Garage at the end of Stepping Stone Rd has a sign                        of about 25 Sq feet, less than 20’ from Stepping Stone Rd                                 telling the public of Planet Cloths drop site, a business from                        a different town.

                  6b  Eliminator business just up the road has many signs                                 attached to the fence and other signs located on their                                 property all bigger than the VRC temporary sign.

                  7b  The Lee Race track as do most other businesses and                                  properties in Lee NH have signs of one type or the other                                  on their properties where as only the VRC is held to a                                 different standard than all others.  Discrimination is against                                 the law and this is discrimination.


6.  The TOL did order two homeless U.S. Military Veterans evicted from 101 Stepping Stone Rd Lee NH, VRC church property.  To order church members that are homeless from church property violates the Separation of church and State.   The evictions violates the U.S. SC making it clear in the case of Fifth Avenue Presbyterian church V. City of NY docket No. 02-0773 that homeless cannot be evicted from church property.  For the TOL to knowingly with intent to harm violate our Constitution, laws, and court precedence case law cannot be tolerated.

         a.  The TOL approved these homeless U.S. Military Veterans                                     moving to worse conditions at 465 Packers falls Rd Lee NH in the               same zone and town as the church property located at 101                                     Stepping Stone Rd.  What is the difference if they live at the                         church property in respectable conditions or on private property                          in less desirable conditions?  The mission from God is for the                        VRC to care for these homeless U.S. Military Combat Veterans.                         To intentionally discriminate against our religious beliefs cannot                        be tolerated.


7.  The TOL ordered portable potties to be placed on VRC property.  The TOL then ordered the potties removed.  There are no ordinances about removing portable potties rented from a respectable business.  The TOL placed a substantial burden on the VRC members for now we have to use a 5-gallon bucket lined with a plastic bag then take the contents left to the Lee dump.    Other properties in Lee NH have portable potties located on their property, private homes and business.  452 Packers falls Rd has one less than 5’ from the rd.  Craving Coffee has one, the lee racetrack has many, and the Lee circle hot dog stand has one.  Portable Potties are a common happening in Lee NH.  No one has to even ask the town to have one placed on any property located in Lee NH never mind get written permission from the TOL as the VRC is required.  The TOL signed the stipulation but has made no effort to make any other properties live by the same standard as the VRC.  This act of intentional discrimination cannot be tolerated. 


8.  The TOL had a legally registered trailer removed from church property, registered in the VRC name (owner of 101 Stepping Stone Rd said property in this case).  The trailer was used daily in our religious practice and was moved to 465 Packers falls Rd in the same zone and town as 101 Stepping Stone Rd with the town knowledge and consent.  To inflict such pain and suffering on our Religious practice for any reason is illegal but for the TOL to do it in such a discriminating manner cannot be tolerated.


9.  The VRC mission from God and the TOL is well aware of our stated mission from God (to help Homeless U.S. Military Veterans with preference going to Combat Veterans) has caused harm to homeless combat veterans in that (Our Government) Veterans Administration and the Veterans Department of the Portsmouth Easter Seals has called many times to ask to let homeless veterans sleeping in their cars (during snow and other storms) on the streets to move to VRC property in a safer and more respectable environment.  The VRC had to refuse these U.S. Military homeless combat Veterans as a result of the TOL discrimination to intentionally harm our Religious Practice. 

Where Fore: The TOL has defied the will of the people of the United States of America and the people of NH from President George Washington whom made the statement “How we treat today’s Veterans will determine how many of tomorrows children will defend this great nation”, to the people of NH that wrote a RSA in 1777 and renewed the same RSA in the year 2012 that towns are obligated to help homeless combat veterans at town expense.  The TOL in the eyes of any reasonable person not only committed the act of Discrimination with intent to harm but they did it with Malice.  The TOL knew that I was 100% mentally and physically disabled and that the VRC could not get an attorney (for money reasons and not one attorney had the time or money to take such a case) so the TOL allowed a mentally and physically disabled person to represent the VRC in what appears to be to take advantage of said mental and physical state as a means to benefit the TOL so the court could over look the clear and intentional violations of our Constitution, RSA’s and the will of the people.  The VRC has a mission from God to help homeless U.S. Military Veterans with preference going to Combat Veterans.  Peter Macdonald with a TBI (no memory of my past life or experiences) was sent to combat and during one convoy somewhere in Vietnam did find a Combat God as I laid in a ditch to avoid enemy patrol inches from stepping on me.  Many Combat Veterans find God in their own way and the resident of Lee NH cannot be allowed to tell these Combat Veterans that our VRC is not welcome in Lee NH as any reasonable person could intrepid their actions in the case.  This is why the VRC is asking this court to in a summary judgment;

1. order the TOL to accept the VRC as a church and refund all money paid to the TOL for any reason by the VRC refunded.


2.  order the TOL to pay 12 Million dollars to the VRC in damages and harm to homeless U.S. Military Veterans as the TOL knowingly with Malice did try to stop the VRC mission from God to help said veterans.


3.  That if the court cannot rule this case as asked that a jury be assembled to hear this case at once for to intentionally harm any person that the TOL does not think deserves to live in their community cannot be tolerated.  To allow the TOL to continue to harm Homeless Combat Veterans is unspeakable, even if the TOL thinks their class of people does not deserve we the homeless Combat Veterans should live near them.

I am a nobody that served in the USMC during a conflict and came back with serious mental and physical disabilities from said actions during and in said conflict.  I do not have the knowledge or ability to follow the protocol required by the court for any individual to seek justice but I so represent the VRC in their mission from God.  The facts in this case as deplorable and unconceivable as it may be are true and if the people are to have any faith in justice cannot be allowed to continue.  We the Combat Veteran deserve no more than any other person under the guarantees of our Constitution but we deserve no less either.  I ask this court to under the Americans with Disabilities Act to let my errors in presentation and protocol to not be used to let the wrongs of government harm any more combat veterans. 

I submit this case this 24 day of September 2015

Peter Macdonald Minister, Sgt USMC.                 


NH Senate Republican Caucus - Legislators concerned by Dover education adequacy suit  

Lifting education adequacy cap stalled by budget veto.

Budget veto stalls funding increases to growing communities

Concord, NH – Following the city of Dover filing a lawsuit seeking increased payments for state education adequacy funding with the Strafford County Superior court this week, Senate Finance Chair Jeanie Forrester (R-Meredith) and Senate Education Committee Vice-Chair Nancy Stiles (R-Hampton) issued the following statements.

“The budget that was passed by the legislature focused, in part, on returning additional funding to cities and towns across the state, including measures to lift the education adequacy cap completely over the next two years,” said Senate Finance Chair Jeanie Forrester (R-Meredith).

“We heard from school districts impacted by the cap that are substantially underfunded with the current formula throughout the process of developing the budget.  But, unfortunately, because Governor Hassan vetoed the legislative budget, school districts whose populations have seen a dramatic increase, like Dover, will not receive increased adequacy funding beyond the existing formula for the next school year,” Forrester added. “This level of uncertainty for schools is another stark consequence of a vetoed budget that cities and towns are dealing with.”

 “I've worked to continually improve education funding for many years and I've heard from many school districts that the funding formula does not meet the needs to provide a satisfactory education for our children in growing or changing communities across the state,” said Senate Education Committee Vice-Chair Nancy Stiles (R-Hampton)

“The budget that passed both the House and Senate this spring took steps to remove the education adequacy funding cap, by lifting it to 160% in 2017 and completely removing it by 2018 so school districts can begin receiving full adequacy payments due per student. I remain concerned that because of the vetoed budget, which included removing the adequacy cap, these critical fixes to education funding will be delayed even longer,” Stiles added.





“Good News” … “Potentially Huge Legal Victory” … “Huge Victory” … “A Big Legal And Political Victory”

The New York Times: “[Perry] Received Some Good News…” “Former Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, who is seeking the Republican nomination for president, received some good news regarding his legal problems on Friday when an appeals court in his state dropped one of the two felony charges he is facing.” (The New York Times, 7/24/15)

The Associated Press: “A Potentially Huge Legal Victory…” “One of two felony indictments against former Texas Gov. Rick Perry was tossed out Friday, giving the Republican presidential candidate a potentially huge legal victory in the face of flagging polling numbers for the 2016 race.” (The Associated Press, 7/24/15)

Bloomberg: “Good News…” “Rick Perry got some needed good news Friday when a Texas court threw out one of two ethics charges he claims were intended to derail his presidential bid.” (Bloomberg, 7/24/15)

Houston Chronicle: “Rick Perry Scores Huge Victory In Legal Battle”
(, 7/24/15)

Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s Max Baker: “A Big Legal And Political Victory…” “Former Gov. Rick [Governor Perry] dodges at least one charge, a big legal and political victory.” (, 7/24/15)

RedState’s Erick Erickson: “I Read The Ct Of Appeals Decision About [Gov. Perry]. Pretty Clear They’ve Have Tossed The Other Count, But Couldn’t In A Habeas Setting.” (, 7/24/15)

The Huffington Post
Headline: “Rick Perry Now Has One Less Problem In His Run For President”
(The Huffington Post, 7/24/15)

New York Magazine: “Perry Got One Step Closer To A Clean Slate…”
“On Friday morning, Perry got one step closer to a clean slate when a Texas appeals court dropped the coercion charge on First Amendment grounds.” (New York Magazine, 7/24/15)


ALG - House's 'tepid lawsuit' encourages Obama to violate law 


Nov. 21, 2014, Fairfax, Va.—Americans for Limited Government President Nathan Mehrens today issued the following statement responding to the House lawsuit against executive implementation of Obamacare:


"Boehner's tepid lawsuit response to five years of President Obama's executive actions to willy nilly change the law without Congress sadly demonstrates the profound weakness of his leadership. By the time Boehner's lawsuit winds its way through the court system, Obamacare will have been fully implemented. Is it this kind of pathetic response that encourages Obama to continue his effective dissolution of the separation of powers."


To view online:




Americans for Limited Government is a non-partisan, nationwide network committed to advancing free market reforms, private property rights and core American liberties. For more information on ALG please visit our website at