Press Releases

 

Entries in Social Security (41)

Sunday
Oct312010

NHDP - While Kuster Tours Three Senior Centers, Democrats Question Bass Plan to Privatize Social Security

Bass Falsely Claimed at Debate "Personal Accounts are Not About the Stock Market"

But His Privatization Plan that Would In Fact Risk Social Security Funds in Market 


Concord - While Ann McLane Kuster toured three senior centers in Concord today, the New Hampshire Democratic Party criticized Congressman Bass' longtime efforts to privatize Social Security.   


"Congressman Bass is dead wrong on this.  It was wrong when he attempted to privatize Social Security in 2005 and it's wrong now," said Harrell Kirstein, press secretary for the New Hampshire Democratic Party. "We cannot risk the safety net that thousands of New Hampshire seniors depend on."   


Congressman Bass tried to claim in this week's debate that he did not support privatization, stating in the WMUR debate that "personal accounts are not about the stock market." 

But in fact, Congressman Bass is repeatedly on record in support of a risky plan to divert Social Security funds into private accounts invested in the stock market. 


According to a 2005 Eagle Times article, "U.S. Rep. Charlie Bass, R-N.H., spoke in favor of privatizing a portion of Social Security benefits" and "Bass endorsed President Bush's proposal for shifting a portion of payroll taxes into private investment accounts, while acknowledging a lot of ground needs to be covered before a vote is taken."   


Recently, Congressman Bass made his support for privatization clear during a Brookline/Mason Republican committee meeting in June.  When an attendee accused him of not having supported Bush's plan to privatize Social Security, Bass replied:  "The fact of the matter is you're wrong.  I did support that."  [Brookline-Mason GOP Meeting, 6/3/10] 


Associated Press: Privatization And "Personal Accounts" Are "The Same Thing." In 2008, the Associated Press wrote a fact check on Sen. John McCain's attempt to distance himself from support for Social Security privatization. The AP wrote, "McCain and other Republicans once spoke more openly of "privatization" but realized people didn't like to hear that. Now they talk of "personal accounts." It's the same thing." [Associated Press, 6/14/08] 


AARP: Privatization v. Personalization Is The Same Concept: According to the AARP, "there is a lot of debate on the semantics rather than the substance. Essentially it doesn't matter if you call the concept 'privatization,' 'personalization,' or anything else-diverting Social Security revenues into individual accounts shifts risk to the individual and hurts the financial status of Social Security itself." [www.aarp.org/money/social_security/a2003-03-26-ssprivatization.html] 


*** FACT SHEET *** 


Bass helped write a budget that squandered the Social Security surplus. On April 14, 1999, as a member of the House Budget Committee Bass helped develop H Con Res 68 - the fiscal 2000 GOP budget resolution - which cut taxes by $778 billion and used the Social Security surplus to pay down the national debt. The House passed the bill 221-208 (CQ Vote 85, R 217-3; D 3-204). 

 

Bass voted to privatize Social Security. On July 25, 2001, Bass voted against the Filner, D-Calif., amendment to HR 2590 - the Treasury Appropriations bill - prohibiting the White House from implementing the Social Security privatization plan being developed by President Bush's Social Security Commission.  The amendment failed 188-238 (CQ Vote 273, R 0-217; D 187-20). 

    The Bush Commission included only proponents of privatization - and ultimately recommended three possible plans, all of which include some privatization of Social Security, which would require an increase in Social Security taxes, a return to the days of deficit spending, or a reduction in guaranteed benefits.  Max Richtman, executive vice president of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, said of the Commission's proposals, "Each of the proposals put forward by the commission require specific, massive cuts in defined benefits - even for those who do not opt for the voluntary accounts (USA Today, 5/15/01; Dallas Morning News, 5/7/01; National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare press release, 12/11/01; NYT, 12/11/01, 12/27/01)." 
     

Eagle Times, Claremont, New Hampshire

March 24, 2005

New Hampshire congressman supports Bush's Social Security plan

By Josh Adams 


CLAREMONT -- U.S. Rep. Charlie Bass, R-N.H., spoke in favor of privatizing a portion of Social Security benefits Wednesday night and asked that voters be patient with the nation's two major political parties as they spar over the contentious issue. 

Making appearances in both Claremont and Lebanon, N.H., Bass endorsed President Bush's proposal for shifting a portion of payroll taxes into private investment accounts, while acknowledging a lot of ground needs to be covered before a vote is taken. 

"All the Democrats are united against it and all the Republicans are united for it," Bass said. 

 

Many residents who turned out in Claremont to hear Bass were retirees or near retirement age, and he spent most of the hour discussing Social Security.  

In Lebanon, the conversation centered on the "third rail," but also included environmental, free trade and energy related issues. 


"I support the establishment of private savings accounts because it allows low- and middle-income workers the chance to get ahead," Bass said. 


Bush is looking for support to privatize Social Security accounts as a means of offering a greater return on people's investments. There is general agreement the system will be bankrupt in decades without changes, but thus far Bush has received mixed reviews regarding his proposal. 


Annuitizing the benefits and raising the taxable income level was discussed in Claremont. A decidedly Democratic audience at the Lebanon City Hall applauded a Hanover resident's suggestion the cap should be increased from the $ 90,000 income level. In Claremont, Bass said doing so would only further stress the program. 


"There's no question that would increase the cash flow into the system," Bass said. "But the more you pay in, the more benefits you're entitled to." Raising the cap, he said, could give higher income beneficiaries $ 5,000 or $ 6,000 a month. 


Currently, the upper 20 percent of the nation's income earners rely on Social Security for only 6 percent of its retirement money, while the lowest earners in the nation's workforce receives 83 percent of its retirement package from Social Security, Bass said, pointing to numbers provided by the Social Security Administration. [Eagle Times, 3/24/05] 




Friday
Oct222010

Shea-Porter Campaign Calls on Guinta to be Honest About his Plans to Abolish Social Security

NEW HAMPSHIRE – Today, the Shea-Porter campaign called on Frank Guinta to be honest with New Hampshire voters about his plans for Social Security.  During Tuesday night’s debate, Guinta once again refused to answer the question about what he would do to keep Social Security solvent.  Guinta has said in the past that he would abolish the system and/or privatize it and put the money on Wall Street.  Social Security is too important for the thousands of New Hampshire seniors and families who rely on this program to have it all taken away.

“Congresswoman Shea-Porter has been very clear about her plan to ensure the solvency of the Social Security Trust Fund,” said Shea-Porter spokeswoman Jamie Radice.  “Frank Guinta refuses to say what his plans are for Social Security.  Guinta has said that he would privatize Social Security, consider turning it into a welfare program, or even abolish the program.  Mr. Guinta needs to be clear about which option he supports.”

Frank Guinta claims he wants to talk about the issues, but he will not give honest answers about his plans.  Granite State voters will hold Mr. Guinta accountable on November 2nd.



Saturday
Oct162010

Shea-Porter Announces House Vote to Provide $250 Check to Social Security Recipients

Manchester, N.H. – Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter today announced that the House of Representatives will vote on legislation to provide $250 checks to Social Security recipients when Congress returns to session.  Congresswoman Shea-Porter is an original cosponsor of this bill, the Seniors Protection Act (H.R. 5987).   The Social Security Administration announced today that there will be no cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for Social Security benefits in 2011. 

“Social Security recipients need help during this difficult economic time,” said Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter.  “That is why I am an original cosponsor of this bill and that is why I will support it when it comes to the House floor in the coming weeks."   

The COLA is based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), published on a monthly basis by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  The COLA is calculated by comparing the CPI-W from the third quarter of the current year to the last third quarter that resulted in a COLA.  If the difference is positive, then the difference is applied to benefits the following January.  The formula to compute a COLA was enacted by Congress in the 1970s.

Saturday
Aug282010

CHQ - 'Compassionate' nonsense aimed at the Tea Party 

NEWS FROM THE FRONT is your daily wrap-up of information affecting the conservative movement! For more information or media inquires, please contact editor@c-hq.com.

To read and comment on these and other articles, click this link.


Mark Fitzgibbons:  'Compassionate' nonsense aimed at the Tea Party
American Thinker (blog) - Mark Fitzgibbons debunks the charge from 'compassionate conservative' Michael Gerson that Tea Parties are a threat to Social Security, claiming that Big Government programs like Social Security will go bankrupt long before the Tea Parties would even be able to touch them.  The Constitution has been so badly damaged that cures will take time, but those like Gersen who attempt to scare people away from the pro-constitutional Tea Party with nonsensical and unimaginative talk are covering for their own interests and failed agendas.

Weak-kneed GOP leadership still keeping its distance from Ryan's 'Roadmap' --
Washington Times

Would Joe Miller be a Tea Party senator from Alaska? --
Salon

At Sen. Lisa Murkowski's request, NRSC are headed to Alaska, does it spell trouble? --
Hot Air

Meet Joe Miller, the man who just may be Alaska's next senator --
Daily Caller

Newt Gingrich:  Repeal Obamacare? Get your congressman on the record --
Human Events

Dear John:  You'd better not stray too far from the conservatives who voted for you --
American Thinker

Washington U.S. Senate race shaping up as competitive for GOP --
Weekly Standard

Tea Party's key to success is there are no leaders --
Washington Examiner


To read these articles and comment on them, click this link.


Sincerely,

Richard A. Viguerie
Chairman
ConservativeHQ.com

Saturday
Jul032010

NHDP -Hypocrisy Alert: Sean Mahoney Flip-Flops on Social Security

Career politician Mahoney takes both sides on social security debate


Concord - Hypocrisy Alert is part of the New Hampshire Democratic Party's efforts to hold Republicans accountable in the coming months for their blatant flip-flopping on a wide-range of issues that matter to all Granite Staters.  Earlier this week we highlighted a top Mahoney for Congress aide, and today we look at Sean Mahoney himself.

Two days ago, Sean Mahoney issued a press release attacking Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner after he announced support for raising the Social Security retirement age for workers 20 or more years away from retirement.  But that is exactly the position Mahoney himself took at a recent debate for first district Republican Congressional Candidates.

In his press release Mahoney commented that, "Social Security is a covenant between taxpaying Americans and their government."  And he added, "If Washington changes the rules now for people who are already in the system, they will demonstrate their disregard for regular Americans once again."  He called Boehner's plan to raise the retirement age, "poorly thought out."

But at the GOP Debate, Mahoney called Social Security a bailout program.  And voiced his support for raising the retirement age.  "But for younger generations they need to understand that there will be other options.  The retirement age maybe later in life than your parents was," (9:37) said Mahoney.  And he called raising the retirement age, a "common sense conservative solution." (10:40)

"Sean Mahoney's flip-flopping and hypocrisy on raising the Social Security Retirement age is ridiculous," said Harrell Kirstein, press secretary for the New Hampshire Democratic Party.  "He couldn't have reversed his position more if he tried. Raise the retirement age, don't raise the retirement age, it's a covenant, it's a bailout, it's a common sense conservative solution, it's a poorly thought out idea."

"This 'say anything to get elected mentality' is more evidence that Sean Mahoney is a career politician,"  continued Kirstein.  "From the time George Bush was elected President, there have only been two elections Sean Mahoney wasn't a candidate in.  Just because he hasn't won an election doesn't mean he's not a career politician."