« The Port Of Portsmouth: Let's Not Put Power In The Hands Of The Few, Or One | Main | Should 17 Year Olds Be Able To Vote In New Hampshire Primaries? »

The "Granny D Bill" Might Become Law

A potentially far-reaching bill that all Republicans and Democrats should support because of the way it can clean up our political system has passed the State Senate and is on its way to Governor John Lynch for his signature. 

House Bill 794 creates a seven-member group which will consider public funding options of certain campaigns in New Hampshire -- possibly Governor, State Senate, and Governor's Council.  So, this legislation could eventually dramatically affect for the good the way that democracy is exercised in our state.

After a public hearing early last year the bill was sent to a House Election Law Subcommittee which I chaired.  There I saw first-hand the enthusiasm for the concept of this bill that Granny D and others brought to her cause as we held a dozen work sessions on the bill.

The Subcommittee even met with Maine State Representatives to learn more about how public funding of certain campaigns works in that state.  Altogether, we had over 35 hours of discussion on this bill in the Legislature. HB 794 passed the House on January 16th on a roll call of 199 to 121.

I have dubbed House Bill 794 as "THE GRANNY D BILL," because this is her cause.  She walked across America in support of "clean elections."  In light of the ever-increasing costs of running for public office and the reliance on personal wealth or extensive fundraising in order to run for public office, this bill seeks to allow for a different approach to funding campaigns for potential candidates without such financial sources.

The people on the bipartisan Commission created by HB 794 will dedicate themselves in the next few months to the task of identifying alternative ways to fund state campaigns.  The  Commission will examine potential revenue sources for funding and develop recommendations to the legislative session of 2009.

This Commission, under the directives of the bill, may consider voluntary contributions, in-kind donations of services, and other means to generate revenue.  The Commission will include not more than three members of a political party.   No Commission members can currently hold elective office.   Two appointments are to be made by the House Speaker, two by the Senate President, two by the Governor, and one by the Secretary of State.  The Commission will report back by December 1, 2008, in time for legislative action in 2009.  

Some twelve states already have "clean election" laws at one level or another, with Maine, Arizona, and Connecticut having statewide versions affecting most elected offices.  This concept has been publicly endorsed by leaders and people who have run for "higher office" from both parties:  former GOVERNOR WALTER PETERSON, former Gubernatorial candidate JIM RUBINS, former Democratic U.S. Senate nominee JOHN RAUH, former Gubernatorial nominee PAUL McEACHERN and former State Senators CLIF BELOW and RICK TROMBLY, among others.  

In addition, SECRETARY OF STATE BILL GARDNER has been a strong advocate of the legislation and the public funding concept.  A number of other long-time supporters of the Granny D cause who have worked with her for the past decade also contributed to the success of the legislation to this point. Representatives of the League of Women Voters, NH Citizens Alliance, Americans for Campaign Reform, Public Action for Clean Elections, and Veterans for Peace NH have also supported the legislation.

I think the Commission will do its job well, and that it will come up with inventive, innovative ways to implement the concept here "The New Hampshire Way."  

House Bill 794 was cosponsored by Representatives PETER ALLEN, BETTY HALL, DANA HILLIARD, BARBARA RICHARDSON, SENATOR JACKIE CILLEY, and myself.   Several members of the House Election Law Committee worked especially hard on making the bill succeed, including DAVID PIERCE, who prepared the amendment creating the Commission, CLAUDIA CHASE and CHUCK WEED, who were on the Subcommittee which I chaired, along with David Pierce and Betty Hall and went to a number of meetings on the bill, and COMMITTEE CHAIR JANE CLEMONS, who helped in passage on the House Floor.

But this one really is a great victory for Granny D -- who repeatedly would tell us this isn't "about her," it's not even "about us," it's about our children, and our future.  

She's right.

Posted on Thursday, April 24, 2008 at 08:22PM by Registered CommenterRep. Jim Splaine | Comments5 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

Finally Splaine talks about something something that matters. Maybe with the help of this we can get some state Reps who will give us a REAL education amendment and stop scheming to tax us into poverty.
April 25, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterRowland
Jim, after reading this article and the bill text I'm not sure I fully understand the concept you are shooting for.
(text of the bill found here: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2008/HB0794.html )

As I read this here's what I'm picturing, please tell me if I'm off base with my interpretation. First off, just to be clear this bill actually makes no changes. It only creates a 7 person committee to consider changes. Is that correct?

But regarding the concept you are pushing for here...
Let's say you and I run for the same office and theoretically I'm a millionaire and you're a low average income earner. I wish to spend 10 million on my campaign. You can only afford $1,000 and you raise another $10,000 in donations but nothing near the $10 million I have to spend.
The idea is this will prevent that and instead give each candidate an equal amount of public funds with which to run their campaign. Is that correct?
April 25, 2008 | Registered CommenterRichard Barnes
Jim

Very good news. Thanks for all you and others have done on this issue.
April 25, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterChaz Proulx
So let me get this straight - we are staring down the barrel of a $200 million deficit in the state budget and now we are going to spend taxpayer dollars on political campaigns??!! This is complete insanity, as well as a completely unjustified use of tax dollars. I will contribute of my own free will to candidates I support, and only candidates I support, thank you very much. This bill is headed for the trash bin, no matter who's name you put on it.

And this is yet another reason to put Republicans back in charge of this legislature.
April 28, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterConcerned Taxpayer
Concerned, while I would still like clarification from Jim on my questions I don't think you have anything to worry about. Assuming what you and I are assuming here is correct and that the goal is to turn elections into publicly funded events the Supreme Court has already ruled that money and more specifically political donations are the equivalent of free speech so publicly funded elections would be deemed unconstitutional.
April 29, 2008 | Registered CommenterRichard Barnes

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.