False Outrage Over "Binders" Demeans Democratic Hacks

When you say something so stupid, no matter where you say it, you deserve to lose all credibility.  That's why my first task here is to be honest and point out the foibles of both parties equally.  Thus, even if you don't agree with me on a given issue, my credibility should remain intact.

For me and for many others, Democrats who are assailing Mitt Romney over his "binders" of women comment from Tuesday's debate are losing all credibility.

Of course, Biden the Buffoon, the Delaware Dolt, jumped into the fray...we could expect that from the body behind a grin, but other Democrats including someone who goes by the name of Elwood with the blueblogbigots has also made an utter fool of himself by attempting to score points out of this issue.

In fact, Mitt Romney should be congratulated for going out of his way as Massachusetts governor to seek qualified women to fill positions.  To way to locate good people is to get resumes which often come in binders.

Thus, to make fun of Romney for this remark only lowers the credibility of those making the stupid remarks.

I know, I know, Democrats are afraid that unless they scare enough women, Mitt Romney will narrow the gender gap and win the Presidency, but the fact is that the Demagogue in Chief has had problem with women in his White House, that he plays women less than men, that Romney has a much better record of hiring women that Obama himself.

This is not an area Democratic hacks should be pursuing but in their usual attempt at a cheap shot, they seem to be rushing headlong into the abyss.

And that's the optimal truth.

Shame of you, Delaware Dolt; shame on you Elwood; and shame on anyone else who thinks getting resumes of qualified women is a bad idea.

This one truly falls into "you just can't make this stuff up" category.