<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.5.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:16:28 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Richard Barnes Blog - Comments</title><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/richard-barnes/</link><description></description><copyright>Copyright NHInsider.com 2006-2007</copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.5.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Steve Mac Donald comments on School Morals</title><author>Steve Mac Donald</author><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:45:39 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/richard-barnes/2009/6/24/school-morals.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:1085004:comment/4640090</guid><description><![CDATA[Turnabout it seems is fair play.  Nicely said.]]></description></item><item><title>Cynical comments on Paying for a Constitutional Right</title><author>Cynical</author><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:36:51 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/richard-barnes/2009/6/16/paying-for-a-constitutional-right.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:1085004:comment/4543559</guid><description><![CDATA[The public schools neither teach speech nor gun safety.<br/>Pehaps, because the truly accomplished students might scare the pants off the teachers.  The below average students would scare the toenails off of the parents.<br/><br/>If you leave it to the public (mecurial mob) to defend an individual's rights, then you're individuals are just gonna be a bunch of slackers.]]></description></item><item><title>Steve Mac Donald comments on Paying for a Constitutional Right</title><author>Steve Mac Donald</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:45:15 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/richard-barnes/2009/6/16/paying-for-a-constitutional-right.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:1085004:comment/4540541</guid><description><![CDATA[Good point Rick.   I've never seen anyting that challanges this though.  I wonder why?]]></description></item><item><title>Richard Barnes comments on The 25 9-11 Conspiracy Theory Questions Answered</title><author>Richard Barnes</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:44:16 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/richard-barnes/2009/6/9/the-25-9-11-conspiracy-theory-questions-answered.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:1085004:comment/4537822</guid><description><![CDATA[I just learned this week that the leading 9-11 conspiracy film, Loose Change, has already been completely revised and I understand they are soon to release a version 3.0.  That says a lot that their original theories failed to hold up so they've had to revise their &quot;facts&quot; in order to draw the conclusions they wish to draw.]]></description></item><item><title>Tom Humphreys comments on 9-11 Theories Wont Go Away</title><author>Tom Humphreys</author><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:32:17 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nhinsider.com/richard-barnes/2009/6/4/9-11-theories-wont-go-away.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">13961:1085004:comment/4492685</guid><description><![CDATA[Mr. Tower:<br/><br/>Let me thank you for all the fine works of fiction you have posted on this site. It must have been quite a challenge to first reach a conclusion, then create facts and information to support and validate it.]]></description></item></channel></rss>