Income Tax Now! And To Hell With The People Who Elect Me!
Friday, May 14, 2010 at 12:29PM "Reasonable Income Tax not that unreasonable." says Seth Marshall (D) Nashua, Dist. 23. Marshall is the latest of a long list of many pimping an Income Tax. "New Hampshire suffers from a profound dependency problem when it comes to asking her wealthier and more able citizens to join supporting the state in which they live," writes Marshall. Suffers from a profound dependency problem? What the heck does that mean? Anyhow, Marshall seems to imply there is a shyness (I think) about asking, "The "wealthier and more able citizens to join supporting the state in which they live..."
When the advancement of ideas for an income tax are before reasonable people in the pretext of the, "wealthier" and "more able" paying their fair share, common folks generally agree this is "class warfare". Al Gore was all about, "making the rich pay their fair share." And, Gore was all about class warfare. Al Gore is a living example of epic hypocrisy.
The Honorable Mr. Marshall never discloses what this, "blessed gift of pamphlet" is. He must assume its factoids are valid at face value. To support his thesis, Marshall treats us to one isolated snippet, asserting, "New Hampshire revenues rely most heavily upon real estate property taxation." I am not sure that is such a bad thing in the context of a state, that demonstrates fiscal restraint and responsibility, but to use those descriptors in the same sentence with the New Hampshire Legislature is a punch line to a fiscal joke.
A reasonable person with ten minutes and a search engine quickly learns income taxes NEVER provide tax relief because governments see revenue as an excuse to spend. Other states have property tax rates that are comparable to the Granite State, yet they have enacted an income tax to reduce the property tax burdens. It never works, folks! Some of these states also have sales taxes, excise taxes and a slew of other such oppressive taxes.
2010 marks a hallmark year where people have had all they can take of a deaf-mute government and its confiscatory tax policies. Implementation of a national healthcare plan against the will of the electorate, advocacy for a European-style value added tax, staggering deficits the country has never seen, and still Seth Marshall and his liberal friends still advocate for the infernal income tax. Marshall's advocacy in the wake of this fiscally unrestrained state legislature, can only be best characterized as audacious.
Citizens have been the recipients of more than forty new fees and taxes; in economic hard times, this legislature expanded spending upwards of twenty-five per-cent and has demonstrated an unwillingness to curb spending.
Mr. Marshall is yet another reason why he and his ilk need to be thrown out of office. What becomes crystal clear is the New Hampshire citizens are being ignored. It was not so long ago that Republican State Representative Liz Hager advocated for a state income tax. She was summarily unseated in her re-election primary. And, were she holding her seat today, she too would be thrown out of office in November.
Class warfare is an oldest and corruptest of arguments. The economic have-nots do not provide the capital or resources that creates businesses and jobs. It is the wealthy. An income tax will never fixes fiscal problems. Fiscal discipline does. Representative Marshall's editorial should serve as a reminder that liberals are bereft of ideas and ignoring the people. To tell us the income tax is not that unreasonable when so very few want it, demonstrates why he needs to be voted out of office.
Reader Comments (2)