Advertising

 

 


 

 

Steve Mac Donald

Monday
Mar112013

Fool Me Once, Shame on You, Fool Me One Hundred Times….Call Me A Republican Senator

White-Flag-of-Surrender smallThe Sunday Union Leader has a staff editorial in which it comes to the defense of Senator Ayotte accepting and attending  an invite to dinner with Mr. Obama and a number of other ‘Ranking’ (see also Rank) GOP Senators.

To suggest that there is no value in conveying that message to the President in person, in a casual setting in which a working relationship might develop, is to misunderstand the way politics works.

Last August, Sen. Tom Coburn (who attended last Wednesday’s dinner) came to the defense of the Tea Party during an interview on MSNBC. Among his points was that Tea Party activists “understand that you’ve got to have human relations to get along in this world.” It is amazing and disappointing that so many activists on both sides think that progress is made by refusing to work with anyone in the other camp.

This is the way politics works, except in the case of Mr. Obama’s politics, this only works for him.

Name one time in which President Obama has met with Republicans (ever) and then proposed an actual compromise, with truly Republican benefits, which he then used his supposed clout or executive might to enact by himself or through his own party machine?  I can’t think of one.

I can however think of a number of occasions where Mr. Obama played at being bi-partisan so that he and his advocates could then use that as a hammer with which to pound their opponents into dust.  I can also think of occasions where this sort of thing managed to get Republicans to agree to what Democrats wanted without Republicans walking away with anything they could call a victory unless not losing everything counts as a win.

Obama doesn’t even listen to the bi-partisan commissions of his own making.

Obama does not compromise. This is all stagecraft, slight of hand, smoke and mirrors.  It is Darth Alinsky.

Mr. Obama and crew manipulate for press and narrative and rhetoric.  They are so good at it that giving guns to drug lords who kill hundreds and letting US diplomats get slaughtered while doing next to nothing (Unless lying about it for weeks counts) roll off them like water on a duck.  So why not leave Senator Paul and the other young guns in the US Senate to their principled 13 hour filibuster and join the old dogs for an attaboy, a scratch behind the ear, and free meal at a swanky DC restaurant so that Obama can ‘listen’ and then use that as yet another left wing weapon of mass public relations destruction on the party he has sworn to destroy?

Senator Ayotte, despite her good intentions, just joined hands with the professional surrender monkeys of the US Senate to hand Mr. Obama weeks or even months of fresh fodder to wield against them.  And in this, I suspect, we can declare her truly a Republican US Senator.  A real ambassador for the party. Someone who is deluded by the notion that Democrats want Republicans for anything more than cover.

And until the hopeful and well-meaning Ayotte’s and Union Leader’s of the world accept that there is nothing genuine about this dinner, the bi-partisan commissions, committees, breakout groups, or listening sessions, there will be no change, just compromise; that is to say Republicans giving Obama what he wants–another club to beat them with until they are as incapable of stopping him as he requires.

Which brings us to the ‘Tea Party.’

The Original Tea Party saw the compromise of their day as well connected politicians bartering the terms of the peoples surrender.  The modern Tea Party understands this as well.  And do not misunderstand.   They’d be happy to talk to Democrats about the best way to roll back the debt and deficit as painlessly as possible before the entire thing collapses and throws the truly needy and everyone else into the fire, but for the well-heeled ruling class.  They came out, exercised their vote, tried to make a difference, and got crapped on for the effort.

They got crapped on because that is not what the left wants to talk about and all threats must be neutralized.  But they are happy to use us, wherever possible, as enemies of the statist, to break us if they can, and at the very least to encourage us to reveal what our plans are so they can strategize against it.  Obama and the Democrats only meets with people if it will help him advance their agenda.  And anything we say can and will be used against us.

And we know this to be true, and not just from Democrats.  In exchange for wanting to prevent that economic collapse the Tea Party was turned into some evil cabal of bigots, racists, and haters.  And if that were not bad enough, the same establishment Republicans who want to give Obama more rope to hang themselves with picked up the lefts narrative about the Tea Party and use it with enthusiasm to protect their own asses. (They do it nationally.  They do it right here in New Hampshire.)

So to the Union Leader’s point–I understand how Obama politics works. How modern Democrat party politics work.   That is why I am less than enthusiastic about freshman Senator Ayotte being moved like a pawn  by the blind-fold wearing, aisle-crossing, appeasement Republicans in the US Senate.  Or less than enthusiastic about the union Leader coming to Senator Ayotte’s defense, marveling at the potential of the Potemkin Obama Dinner, convinced that it could be anything other than what I have just described.

 

You are reading  "Fool Me Once, Shame on You, Fool Me One Hundred Times….Call Me A Republican Senator"   by  Steve Mac Donald originally posted at GraniteGrok.com (Home)

 

Steve has been recognized as the Americans For Prosperity Blogger of the month for December 2012

Steve Mac Donald has been recognized as the AFP December Blogger of the month

 

Monday
Mar112013

Ask Democrat Carol Shea-Porter About Vaccines For New Hampshire Kids

 

Back on February 26th, in the midst of the blame Republicans for Obama’s Sequester narrative, New Hampshire District One Congressperson Carol Shea-Porter tweeted this.

Carol Shea Porter tweets about Sequester and vaccines

The sequester would automticlly cut 30 million dollars from the section 317 program run by the CDC that sends money to states to support vaccination programs.

Carol thought you might want to know, probably after someone told her to tell you, that cutting 30 million from the Section 317 program would be, like, bad.

So if cutting 30 million would be bad, would cutting almost 60 million be almost twice as bad?

Carol’s a follower.  A rubber stamp for the left.  So maybe she didn’t know that Barack Obama’s 2013 budget was already scheduled to cut $58 million dollars from the same section 317 program.   But based on my back of the envelope calculations Obama’s budget cut to that program would have resulted in 1,314 NH Kids not getting vaccines like measles, mumps & rubella–that is, if Carol’s tweeted figure was even legitimate in the first place.

For our confused Democrat readers, Obama’s 58 million dollar cut to the program that funds vaccines for kids is more of a cut than $30 million from Obama’s sequester, so while the White House was prompting the media and congressional Democrats to blame Republicans for denying vaccines to kids Obama was already cutting almost twice as much from the program himself.

CNS News

“The FY 2013 budget request for the Section 317 immunization program reflects a program level decrease of $57.986 million,” the administration’s Centers for Disease Control (CDC) budget says. The CDC is the agency in charge of the 317 grant program.  

Wait, it gets better.

Here is video of Congressman Andy Harris (Dr. Andrew Harris, M.D.) from Maryland, spanking speaking to Dr. Tom Frieden,  the Director of the CDC, on this very question.

At 1:58.

Congressman Harris:Let me get it straight. Under the presidents cut, of 58 million dollars to the 317 program, you think you can get around that to avoid cutting vaccines to children.  But under a sequester, that the President blames on Republicans, you don’t know if you can do that?

 

You are reading  "Ask Democrat Carol Shea-Porter About Vaccines For New Hampshire Kids"   by  Steve Mac Donald originally posted at GraniteGrok.com (Home)

 

Steve has been recognized as the Americans For Prosperity Blogger of the month for December 2012

Steve Mac Donald has been recognized as the AFP December Blogger of the month

 

Thursday
Mar072013

Ruth Gulick – A Belknap County Democrat Morality Tale

 

Once Upon A Time

Democrats say the darnedest things.  Take NH House Rep Ruth Gulick (D- Aesop’s Fables), whom Skip from GraniteGrok recorded at a recent Belknap county budget meeting.  Ruth shared a little morality tale with those present, with regard to budgets and responsibility.

In Ruth’s version the county taxpayers have a moral responsibility to the employees whom they pay.  That responsibility includes ensuring that the employees continue to enjoy the lifestyle to which they have become accustomed, regardless of any other circumstances.  Put simply; she objects to taxpayers (or any of their elected representatives) asking those employees to pay more for their own benefits.

Not a surprise coming from a Democrat, until you hear how she went about it.

To make that point, as Skip observed here, she compares paying for county employee benefits to how she is “…a superb parent because I give them an allowance and I pay for their food and clothes.”

So in Ruth’s analogy, as a” mother,” we have an obligation we are not permitted to shrug regardless, presumably, of how painful that might become.

We also have to assume, for her analogy to have any relevance at all to the debate at hand,  that the money for the food, clothing, and allowance Ruth gives her own children did not actually come from Ruth.  She will have had to go door to door and extracted it from her neighbors, using the looming authority of the law and the backing of the power of the police state, to guarantee her “superbness” as a parent.  And this shall have occurred without regard to the neighbors rights or needs, their right to their own  labor and property, or whether Ruth’s “shakedown” could in any way affect their own ability to be as superb a parent as Ruth.

Such is the nature of the Left’s morality.

Taken to its extreme, Ruth’s ”children” (or government employees) have more rights than anyone else, including Ruth, so it would be acceptable for them to cannibalize her should the need eventually arise, to ensure that they do not see any decline whatsoever to the lifestyle to which they feel they have become accustomed (see also “entitled”).   And that consumption is inevitable as the state grows larger and more demanding at the expense of those with dwindling resources with which to feed it.

And therein lies the real morality tale of Ruth ‘Aespo’ Gulick.   The needs of the state outweigh the needs of the many, even up until there are no longer any resources left among the “many” to feed and clothe them.    The state is nothing more than a fire we feed, incapable of starting itself, unable to even sustain itself without the resources of others, but entitled to demand a never-ending escalation of those resources until it has consumed them all, leaving nothing left, including itself.

Sorry, there is no happy ending to this tale.

 

You are reading  "Ruth Gulick – A Belknap County Democrat Morality Tale"   by  Steve Mac Donald originally posted at GraniteGrok.com (Home)

 

Steve has been recognized as the Americans For Prosperity Blogger of the month for December 2012

Steve Mac Donald has been recognized as the AFP December Blogger of the month

 

Thursday
Mar072013

Does the Gas Tax Bill The NH House Just Passed Violate the State Constitution?

NH House passes gas tax in violation of NH Constitution

The short answer is yes.  Yes, it does.  (The long answer will be nothing but excuses from its proponents.)

Part II, Article 6-a, states that any money raised through gas taxes (gas road tolls), must be used exclusively for public highways and “no part of such revenues shall, by transfer or funds or otherwise, be diverted to any other purpose whatsoever.”

[Art.] 6-a. [Use of Certain Revenues Restricted to Highways.] All revenue in excess of the necessary cost of collection and administration accruing to the state from registration fees, operators’ licenses, gasoline road tolls or any other special charges or taxes with respect to the operation of motor vehicles or the sale or consumption of motor vehicle fuels shall be appropriated and used exclusively for the construction, reconstruction and maintenance of public highways within this state, including the supervision of traffic thereon and payment of the interest and principal of obligations incurred for said purposes; and no part of such revenues shall, by transfer of funds or otherwise, be diverted to any other purpose whatsoever.

So HB 617 is unconstitutional.

Note to the NH State Senate   HB 617 cannot raise funds through a gas tax for any other purpose.  If you were looking for a way to kill it you have your out.  (Or should I now expect a litany of loopholes and end-arounds from revenue junkies?)

Fifteen Republicans voted for it, as did 192 Democrats.  Ten Democrats crossed the aisle to vote against the unconstitutional tax on the middle class and small business owners.  We appreciate their support on this issue.

Democrats who voted no

Carroll, Douglas Democrat
Cote, David Democrat
Garcia, Michael Democrat
Leishman, Peter Democrat
O’Flaherty, Tim Democrat
Parkhurst, Henry Democrat
Rosenwald, Cindy Democrat
Shaw, Barbara Democrat
Thomas, Yvonne Democrat
White, Syndi Democrat

 

Here is the full list of Yea votes for HB 617

Rep Party County District Vote
Aguiar, James Democrat Grafton 7 Yea
Alicea, Caroletta Democrat Merrimack 8 Yea
Almy, Susan Democrat Grafton 13 Yea
Ames, Richard Democrat Cheshire 9 Yea
Andrews, Christopher Democrat Merrimack 23 Yea
Andrews-Ahearn, E. Elaine Democrat Rockingham 37 Yea
Arsenault, Beth Democrat Belknap 9 Yea
Baber, William Democrat Strafford 14 Yea
Backus, Robert Democrat Hillsborough 19 Yea
Bartlett, Christy Democrat Merrimack 19 Yea
Beaulieu, Jane Democrat Hillsborough 45 Yea
Benn, Bernard Democrat Grafton 12 Yea
Berch, Paul Democrat Cheshire 1 Yea
Berube, Roger Democrat Strafford 18 Yea
Bixby, Peter Democrat Strafford 17 Yea
Boisvert, Ronald Democrat Hillsborough 45 Yea
Borden, David Democrat Rockingham 24 Yea
Bouchard, Candace Democrat Merrimack 18 Yea
Briden, Steven Democrat Rockingham 18 Yea
Brown, Pam Democrat Hillsborough 31 Yea
Brown, Rebecca Democrat Grafton 2 Yea
Buco, Thomas Democrat Carroll 2 Yea
Burdwood, Greg Democrat Strafford 17 Yea
Burke, Rachel Democrat Strafford 2 Yea
Burns, Scott Democrat Merrimack 2 Yea
Burridge, Delmar Democrat Cheshire 16 Yea
Burtis, Elizabeth Democrat Rockingham 6 Yea
Butler, Edward Democrat Carroll 7 Yea
Butynski, William Democrat Cheshire 1 Yea
Cahill, Michael Democrat Rockingham 17 Yea
Cali-Pitts, Jacqueline Democrat Rockingham 30 Yea
Campbell, David Democrat Hillsborough 33 Yea
Carey, Lorrie Democrat Merrimack 26 Yea
Carson, Clyde Democrat Merrimack 7 Yea
Chandley, Shannon Democrat Hillsborough 22 Yea
Chase, Cynthia Democrat Cheshire 8 Yea
Cloutier, John Democrat Sullivan 10 Yea
Connor, Evelyn Democrat Hillsborough 2 Yea
Cooney, Mary Democrat Grafton 8 Yea
Coulombe, Gary Democrat Coos 3 Yea
Cushing, Robert Democrat Rockingham 21 Yea
Danielson, David Republican Hillsborough 7 Yea
Davis, Frank Democrat Merrimack 20 Yea
DiMartino, Lisa Democrat Belknap 2 Yea
DiSilvestro, Linda Democrat Hillsborough 9 Yea
Eaton, Daniel Democrat Cheshire 3 Yea
Ebel, Karen Democrat Merrimack 5 Yea
Emerson-Brown, Rebecca Democrat Rockingham 27 Yea
Enman, Larry Democrat Coos 1 Yea
Flockhart, Eileen Democrat Rockingham 18 Yea
Ford, Susan Democrat Grafton 3 Yea
Frambach, Mary Democrat Merrimack 21 Yea
Frazer, June Democrat Merrimack 13 Yea
French, Barbara Democrat Merrimack 6 Yea
Friedrich, Carol Democrat Grafton 16 Yea
Friel, William Republican Rockingham 14 Yea
Gage, Ruth Democrat Hillsborough 6 Yea
Gagnon, Raymond Democrat Sullivan 5 Yea
Gale, Sylvia Democrat Hillsborough 28 Yea
Gardner, Janice Democrat Strafford 15 Yea
Gidge, Kenneth Democrat Hillsborough 33 Yea
Gile, Mary Democrat Merrimack 27 Yea
Goley, Jeffrey Democrat Hillsborough 8 Yea
Gorman, Mary Democrat Hillsborough 31 Yea
Gottling, Suzanne Democrat Sullivan 2 Yea
Grady, Brenda Democrat Hillsborough 21 Yea
Graham, John Republican Hillsborough 7 Yea
Grassie, Anne Democrat Strafford 11 Yea
Grenier, James Republican Sullivan 7 Yea
Grossman, Kenneth Democrat Strafford 4 Yea
Gulick, Ruth Democrat Belknap 1 Yea
Hammon, Marcia Democrat Coos 5 Yea
Hammond, Jill Democrat Hillsborough 24 Yea
Hansberry, Daniel Democrat Hillsborough 35 Yea
Harding, Laurie Democrat Grafton 13 Yea
Harriott-Gathright, Linda Democrat Hillsborough 36 Yea
Hatch, William Democrat Coos 6 Yea
Heden, Ruth Democrat Hillsborough 23 Yea
Heffron, Frank Democrat Rockingham 18 Yea
Helmstetter, Barbara Democrat Rockingham 9 Yea
Henle, Paul Democrat Merrimack 12 Yea
Hess, David Republican Merrimack 24 Yea
Higgins, Patricia Democrat Grafton 12 Yea
Hirsch, Geoffrey Democrat Merrimack 6 Yea
Hooper, Dorothea Democrat Strafford 16 Yea
Horrigan, Timothy Democrat Strafford 6 Yea
Hubbard, Pamela Democrat Strafford 12 Yea
Hunt, Jane Democrat Merrimack 15 Yea
Huot, David Democrat Belknap 3 Yea
Irwin, Virginia Democrat Sullivan 6 Yea
Jack, Martin Democrat Hillsborough 36 Yea
Jasper, Shawn Republican Hillsborough 37 Yea
Johnsen, Gladys Democrat Cheshire 7 Yea
Kaen, Naida Democrat Strafford 5 Yea
Karrick, David Democrat Merrimack 25 Yea
Katsiantonis, George Democrat Hillsborough 17 Yea
Katsiantonis, Thomas Democrat Hillsborough 15 Yea
Kelley, John Democrat Hillsborough 32 Yea
Kelly, Sally Democrat Merrimack 20 Yea
Ketel, Stephen Democrat Strafford 17 Yea
Khan, Aboul Republican Rockingham 20 Yea
Kidder, David Republican Merrimack 5 Yea
Knowles, Mary Ann Democrat Hillsborough 37 Yea
Lauer, Linda Democrat Grafton 15 Yea
Lavender, Tom Democrat Carroll 5 Yea
Lefebvre, Benjamin Democrat Sullivan 1 Yea
Lerandeau, Alfred Democrat Cheshire 12 Yea
Levesque, Melanie Democrat Hillsborough 26 Yea
Lockwood, Priscilla Republican Merrimack 9 Yea
Long, Patrick Democrat Hillsborough 42 Yea
Lovejoy, Patricia Democrat Rockingham 36 Yea
Lovett, Sid Democrat Grafton 8 Yea
MacKay, James Democrat Merrimack 14 Yea
MacKay, Mariellen Democrat Hillsborough 30 Yea
Malloy, Dennis Democrat Strafford 4 Yea
Manley, Jonathan Democrat Hillsborough 3 Yea
Mann, John Democrat Cheshire 2 Yea
Mann, Maureen Democrat Rockingham 32 Yea
Massimilla, Linda Democrat Grafton 1 Yea
McCloskey, David Democrat Hillsborough 16 Yea
McConkey, Mark Republican Carroll 3 Yea
McNamara, Richard Democrat Hillsborough 38 Yea
Menear, H. Robert Democrat Strafford 25 Yea
Miller, David Democrat Strafford 23 Yea
Milz, David Republican Rockingham 6 Yea
Moffett, Howard Democrat Merrimack 9 Yea
Moody, Marcia Democrat Rockingham 17 Yea
Moynihan, Wayne Democrat Coos 2 Yea
Mulholland, Catherine Democrat Grafton 17 Yea
Muns, Chris Democrat Rockingham 21 Yea
Myler, Mel Democrat Merrimack 10 Yea
Nelson, Mary Democrat Hillsborough 35 Yea
Nordgren, Sharon Democrat Grafton 12 Yea
O’Brien, Michael Democrat Hillsborough 36 Yea
O’Hearne, Andrew Democrat Sullivan 3 Yea
Pantelakos, Laura Democrat Rockingham 25 Yea
Pastor, Beatriz Democrat Grafton 12 Yea
Patten, Dick Democrat Merrimack 17 Yea
Pelletier, Marsha Democrat Strafford 20 Yea
Perry, Robert Democrat Strafford 3 Yea
Phillips, Larry Democrat Cheshire 5 Yea
Piper, Wendy Democrat Grafton 10 Yea
Porter, Marjorie Democrat Hillsborough 1 Yea
Ramsey, Peter Democrat Hillsborough 8 Yea
Ratzki, Mario Democrat Merrimack 1 Yea
Raymond, Ian Democrat Belknap 4 Yea
Rhodes, Brian Democrat Hillsborough 30 Yea
Rice, Chip Democrat Merrimack 27 Yea
Richardson, Gary Democrat Merrimack 10 Yea
Roberts, Kris Democrat Cheshire 4 Yea
Robertson, Timothy Democrat Cheshire 6 Yea
Rogers, Katherine Democrat Merrimack 28 Yea
Rogers, Rose Marie Democrat Strafford 22 Yea
Rokas, Ted Democrat Hillsborough 12 Yea
Rollo, Deanna Democrat Strafford 18 Yea
Sad, Tara Democrat Cheshire 1 Yea
Scarlotto, Joe Democrat Rockingham 31 Yea
Schamberg, Thomas Democrat Merrimack 4 Yea
Schlachman, Donna Democrat Rockingham 18 Yea
Schmidt, Andrew Democrat Sullivan 1 Yea
Schmidt, Janice Democrat Hillsborough 28 Yea
Schmidt, Peter Democrat Strafford 19 Yea
Schuett, Dianne Democrat Merrimack 20 Yea
Shattuck, Gilman Democrat Hillsborough 1 Yea
Shepardson, Marjorie Democrat Cheshire 10 Yea
Sherman, Thomas Democrat Rockingham 24 Yea
Shurtleff, Stephen Democrat Merrimack 11 Yea
Smith, Marjorie Democrat Strafford 6 Yea
Smith, Suzanne Democrat Grafton 8 Yea
Smith, Timothy Democrat Hillsborough 17 Yea
Soucy, Timothy Democrat Hillsborough 34 Yea
Spang, Judith Democrat Strafford 6 Yea
Spratt, Stephen Democrat Hillsborough 4 Yea
Stevens, Audrey Democrat Strafford 7 Yea
Sullivan, Daniel Democrat Hillsborough 42 Yea
Sullivan, Peter Democrat Hillsborough 10 Yea
Sweeney, Cynthia Democrat Sullivan 8 Yea
Sykes, George Democrat Grafton 13 Yea
Sytek, John Republican Rockingham 8 Yea
Takesian, Charlene Republican Hillsborough 37 Yea
Tanner, Linda Democrat Sullivan 9 Yea
Theberge, Robert Democrat Coos 3 Yea
Ticehurst, Susan Democrat Carroll 3 Yea
Till, Mary Democrat Rockingham 6 Yea
Tilton, Franklin Republican Belknap 3 Yea
Tilton, Joy Democrat Merrimack 3 Yea
Townsend, Charles Democrat Grafton 11 Yea
Turcotte, Alan Democrat Merrimack 22 Yea
Vail, Suzanne Democrat Hillsborough 29 Yea
Verschueren, James Democrat Strafford 13 Yea
Wall, Janet Democrat Strafford 6 Yea
Wallner, Mary Jane Democrat Merrimack 10 Yea
Walsh, Robert Democrat Hillsborough 11 Yea
Walz, Mary Beth Democrat Merrimack 23 Yea
Ward, Kenneth Democrat Strafford 21 Yea
Waterhouse, Kevin Republican Rockingham 7 Yea
Watrous, Rick Democrat Merrimack 16 Yea
Wazlaw, Brian Democrat Rockingham 29 Yea
Webb, Leigh Democrat Merrimack 3 Yea
Weber, Lucy Democrat Cheshire 1 Yea
Weed, Charles Democrat Cheshire 16 Yea
White, Andrew Democrat Grafton 13 Yea
Whittemore, Lisa Democrat Rockingham 5 Yea
Williams, Kermit Democrat Hillsborough 4 Yea
Winters, Joel Democrat Hillsborough 18 Yea
Woodbury, David Democrat Hillsborough 5 Yea
Young, Harry Democrat Cheshire 14 Yea

 

Note:  Yes, 6-a does allow these funds to be used to pay for policing the roadways it applies to, but not any of the other things HB 617 would fund, not most if not all of th ethings the Highway fund has been raided for in the past

 

You are reading  "Does the Gas Tax Bill The NH House Just Passed Violate the State Constitution?"   by  Steve Mac Donald originally posted at GraniteGrok.com (Home)

 

Steve has been recognized as the Americans For Prosperity Blogger of the month for December 2012

Steve Mac Donald has been recognized as the AFP December Blogger of the month

 

Tuesday
Mar052013

Roll Call Examines Why The NH-GOP is Such a Mess

Roll Call has an article that will be making the rounds.  According to some people from around the Republican firmamanet…

The Granite State’s political infrastructure is “a mess,” complain out-of-state GOP consultants, and the state has become an increasingly difficult place to run campaigns.

The article goes on to observe some coincidences with problems in the national party, problems with turnover in the party structure itself, and in the control of the legislature.  It then quotes “Tea Party Critic” Fergus Cullen, which I suppose makes sense because he happens to be one of the GOP “experts” at standing idly by while New Hampshire turned Purple, or is it Blue?

 

Cullen thinks 2010 was an outlier that can’t be duplicated. While Jack Kimball, whom I suppose we could identify as a ‘Fergus Cullen Critic,’ believes those voters could be inspired to turn out for the GOP again.

Meanwhile, top recruits are waiting for a better sense of the national political landscape before jumping into a 2014 race for House or Senate. New Hampshire Republicans struggle as the local party out of power — with fundraising, and most of all, with the chasm between the tea party and the more traditional GOP establishment in the state.

Longtime Granite State Republicans blame the tea party for hurting the GOP’s brand with independents. And the tea party activists blame the party elders for exclusion.

This factionalism led to upheaval at the party’s helm. Party chairmen and executive directors come and go (or are sometimes outright ousted), which means various officials and operatives are pitted against each other about once a year.

The state party, as defined by its platform, is a pro-liberty, Conservative vehicle.   It is the establishment that has chosen to ignore that in pursuit of other things.  And one of those things is the affection of the national party, which has wandered even further off the reservation.  So the conservative and Libertarian arms of the party differ primarily because the establishment Republicans are behaving more like Democrats.

The article then visits the challenge Jennifer Horn faces in sorting this all out, with observations about whether Senator Kelly Ayotte will provide some much needed foundation, then finally arrives at what I happen to think is the biggest issue we face as a party.

The First in the Nation Primary.

Roll Call observes…

Aside from these internal clashes, what hurts the party most is what the state fights so hard to keep: its first-in-the-nation primary placement on the presidential nominating calendar.

In 2016, national Republicans will host their third nomination battle for the White House in as many presidential cycles. As a result, the local GOP’s most talented political staff spends at least two years of every cycle working against one another on presidential campaigns.

I have suggested that the internal clashes are a feature, not a bug of the FITN primary, when it comes to Republicans.

I will tell you that I think the obsession with New Hampshire’s first in the nation primary is a debilitating albatross that keeps the well heeled backroom establishment folks (and their rising camp followers) on the invite lists to all the best parties with all the right people, but does little or nothing to help us raise more money to elect Republicans in New Hampshire–which, if I am not mistaken, is the actual point of the state party in the first place.

Sure, we get to fill hotel rooms with campaign staffers and media hacks for a few months, and the sunlight shines a little brighter on the words of every political pundit or diner occupant with two thoughts to rub together (including myself), but if that doesn’t help us raise more money or elect more Republicans in New Hampshire, we are nothing more than quadrennial reality show rejects chasing photo-ops and hand shakes for our scrap-books and Facebook pages, for no tangible long term advantage.

The FITN is like the Oscars for the consultants and experts who launder money for the National Party and who stand guard at the gated community where all the big check writers reside, except that the after parties come before the awards, and you need to know people to get taken seriously.  None of which consistently adds money to the party coffers or results in more Republicans getting elected down ticket.

So the chasm between real Republicans and the modern establishment or Progressive Republicans is a matter of party before principle.  The party wants to win regardless of principle so it is all about connections, control, influence, and even acting like a Democrat if that is what is required to win elections, even though it doesn’t win elections. 

Platform Republicans, Libertarians, Conservatives, (The so called Tea Party folks), view that as detrimental to the idea of Republicanism, liberty and personal responsibility–Freedom.

You want to bring us together?  Stop acting like you would trade your country (or your state) for a few pieces of silver.

 

You are reading  "Roll Call Examines Why The NH-GOP is Such a Mess"   by  Steve Mac Donald originally posted at GraniteGrok.com (Home)

 

Steve has been recognized as the Americans For Prosperity Blogger of the month for December 2012

Steve Mac Donald has been recognized as the AFP December Blogger of the month

 

Page 1 ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... 285 Next 5 Entries »