Minnesota Democrats Bullying a Candidate for Practicing Gay Sex?

Here’s a real winner from Minnesota.  State party Democrats are trying to convince Legislator Kerry Gauthier not to run for re-election in his reliably Democrat district.  Gauthier, 56, had consensual oral sex with a 17 year old boy at a rest stop in Duluth back in July.   (The age of consent for such matter appears to be 16 in Minnesota.)   Gauthier, also a Democrat, has caught local party leadership with their pants down–they want him to drop out of his race as soon as possible.

Their point seems to be that this is inappropriate conduct for two males above the age of consent, and that it is a distraction. But I though the Democrat Party line was that consensual sex between any two consenting “adults” was a right (and their own damn business)…no matter what kind of sex it was?  So what the hell just happened?

If Democrats do not believe it is immoral nor illegal then why would the Minnesota Democrat party be objecting to its exercise?  What is it that has them put-off?

The fact that the State legislator is 56 and his sex partner was 17?

How about that the 17 year old responded to Gauthier’s Craig’s List ad for “no-strings attached” sex?

Was it the fact that the sex occurred in public–though no one seems to have noticed or reported it at the time?

Did he break some law no one is reporting?

Is Gauthier married, like the party of Clinton, Weiner, and Edwards would really care about that?

My guess is political power.  Political power does trump all else.  And despite all the words and gestures about support for gay-rights, sexual freedom, it’s my body, Democrats who want kids being educated about sex as young as possible and about how gay sex is normal, all that noise about gay  kids being bullied,  Democrats wanting 12 or 13 year old kids to have abortions without parental consent…after all of that they don’t want voters to know that this is an acceptable part of the sexual culture they endorse every day through their legislation and the kinds of issues they claim to support.

And then they try to bully a candidate out of his race for participating in a consensual homosexual act.

By all accounts, what occurred in the rest stop in Minnesota–at least by the standards of your average Democrat–might as well be protected free speech.

Yet here we have a growing movement among Minnesota Democrats to kick Gauthier out of his race in time for them to suck up to some passable write in candidate they can all get behind in time for November.

Talk about hypocrisy.

So here’s an exit question.  Will the openly homosexual Democrat party chairman and champion of gay rights from New Hampshire stand up and defend Gauthier or will he join the hypocrites.  Silence, by the way, should be taken as joining the hypocrites.

Note: For those who got this far…I am not commenting on the morality condoning the sex act, legal standards, ages of consent, the appropriateness of this elected officials behavior, or anything other than the Democrat parties response to it and what ii tells us about them and their policy stands.  Any other assumptions on your part are just that–”yours,” and” assumptions.” But we will happily entertain them for the purpose of debate if you just can’t help yourself.

You are reading "Minnesota Democrats Bully Candidate..."  by Steve Mac Donald originally posted at GraniteGrok.com (Home)

Left Wing Hyporcisy Must Die!

Everyone knows that the Matthew Shepherd Pentagon Spending Hate Crimes bill does not apply to anyone on the right.  Oh, and being the object of left wing attacks is truly the highest form of flattery.  So the first person shooter, Tea Party Zombies must die, in which you get to attack and kill prominent Republicans, generic tea party supporters, and all of the lefts various straw men is an example of whom they fear, how the left will embrace the game because they are all hypocrites when it comes to the New Tone ^TM, and also how you could never produce a game called Obama Zombies must die, in which the entire White House staff is gunned down or beaten by players to save America from unconstitutional, bureaucratic overreach.  But why not try?

C'mon, you know the Zombie Czars would look great centered in one of those verboten reticles the left is always telling us we love.

How about GLBT Zombies must die, in which crazed metro-sexuals, gender confused people wearing God made me this way t-shirts, and the openly alternately life-styled but fashionable for an undead horde horde must have their heads smashed in with a crow bar...just because they overwhelminlgy support democrats.  Look, it's Tim Gill, even Ray Buckley!  (Imitation is still the highest form of flattery Ray, you should be honored.)   And you know, we never did have that gun-wielding-blood-bath the NH Dems promised us if we let people carry in the state house.  We could duplicate it in a first person shooter like Tea Party Zombies must die.  Maybe as an an Expansion pack, you know, for the sake of all that Bipartisan BS you democrats are always shoveling.

The Democrats in Congress must die?  You get to impale, shoot, chop or smash Nancy Pelosi,  Steny Hoyer, Alan Grayson, Maxine Waters, Harry Reid or even a few RINOs, as you race to stop the passage of the job killing Obamacare, investment stifling bank reform, and prevent trillions in wasteful handouts to cronies and favored special interest groups that do nothing but make matters worse for regular tea party Americans

Would that get their skirts in a knot?  You bet.  But all in good, meaningless fun, right! Just like the TEA party Zombie slaughter. 

Closer to home we could have the New Hampshire Democrat Party Must Die.  (I know for a fact they'll never seriously object to the TEA Party must die version of the game and as such the entire state party must be held responsible for failing to denounce it; until they all denounce it they own it--their rules.)  So imagine Terie Norelli, Sylvia Larsen, John Lynch, and Kathy Sullivan, all gore covered, relentless, brain eating, mindless ...actually wait.  They are already zombies.   No matter how many times you put them down they keep getting back up, moaning about social justice, class warfare, and government can create jobs, Mnnnhhhhggrrerraarrgh.    Or maybe like that mummy from Scooby doo; Coiiinnn.  Coiiinnnn. (They always want more of your tax dollars.)

My advice?  Electoral Double Tap.  Vote them back down in 2012, then they'll have even more free time to play games like TEA Party zombies must die.

Meanwhile, we on the right will continue to play the game called "Left wing Hypocrisy Must die."  All you need is a few brain cells, free speech, and a ballot box to win.

Cocktail Weiners

I was rummaging around over at Open Secrets.org and came across this little tid-bit. Apparently Matt Damon scheduled a fundraising event for Congressman Weiner.

Anyone want to call Matt and see if he thinks a Cocktail Reception is still a good idea?  Seems to me the Congressman has probably had enough of those after the last two weeks and Cocktail reception has taken on a whole new meaning.

You also have to wonder who would show up? College Co-eds?

The Invitiation

 cross posted at granitegrok.com

The Sweet Stench Of Left Wing Hypocrisy

This morning the Union Leader (UL) nails Zandra Rice Hawkins and Granite State Progress to the very cross on which she intended to crucify her Republican opponents.  Seems Hawkins has made a stink about a recent special election and the odor of "out of state money" used to influence elections. 

The Union Leader wastes no time, exposing Hawkins connection to money she received May 11th from America Votes (out of state left wing donation), which Hawkins/Granite State Progress then used to support the Democrat in the special election she is squawking at Republicans about, specifically to elect that democrat, in that election.

Did she forget?  No, she just has major character flaw.  It is called "progressive democrat."

And she is not alone.  New Hampshire democrats do this all the time.  They have collected millions from outside the state.  Ray "out of state money" Buckley brags about how he out fund-raises the Republicans (by factors of two or more would be my guess) in every election cycle, with tons of cash coming from outside the state.  The entire democrat apparatus from the paid out of state union AstroTurf they send to Concord, all the way up to the party leadership, to the democrat Governor of New Hampshire, demagog the issue of Republicans using out of state money while they proudly use more of it to affect in-state elections than (probably) the entire Republican take from all sources in any given year.

This hypocrisy is a foundation for the maxim, "If democrats are bitching about it, it is because they are already guilty of it."  And when or where has this not been the case? (Free speech, for example, is "protected" by intimidating or eliminating the kinds of speech or press democrats object to.)  I've written so many articles about their various hypocrisies that rarely a week goes by without one, and only then because there are so many to choose from I just don't bother.

So Zandra Rice Hawkins is just following the template of the democrat machine. That is why she took out of state money for that race, filed her required public paperwork to declare it, proceeded  to spend it to elect the democrat, (who won) and can then attack her losing opponents for what she just did without as much as a second thought.

Think about that.  She knows what she did, and still a public attack on her opponents is the next step for what?  To focus attention on your own hypocrisy?  Of course not.  She does not believe that she, nor any democrat for that matter,  will ever have to be held to account for this or any other hypocrisy they perpetrate.  And there are plenty of them.

So this is not so much about money as it is about character.  Hawkins obviously has none.  The state democrat leadership has none.   Nor do the democrats who condone, defend, excuse, or support this behavior, nor the independents and RINO's who refuse to acknowledge it by continuing to vote for  and elect into power members of a political party that expect to be able to almost daily misrepresent the truth in broad daylight and not suffer any consequence from it.  Will someone, anyone on the left step up and call her out?

This is what the democrat party has become.  This is why they cannot be trusted to run a lemonade stand, let alone your government.  It's why I call them Hypocrats.

Citation: Union Leader, Editorial Page:

Relevant Portion of Text from UL Editorial (Digital Edition)

In the latest state campaign finance report we could find, dated in 2008, every contributor to America Votes-NH lived outside of New Hampshire.

In the May 17 election, America Votes gave Granite State Progress $1,500 to defeat Kucmas. Granite State Progress filed as a political action committee for this race on May 11 — the same day it received America Votes’ $1,500. America Votes filed as a PAC on May 10. So in the last week before the election, these two PACs appeared and dropped $1,500 to defeat the Republican.

Rice-Hawkins, who gave $50 to Jennifer Daler, Kucmas’ opponent, might have limited her complaint to possible violations of election law. Instead, she spun it as principled opposition to out-of-state interests trying to affect New Hampshire elections, something she is clearly not opposed to, as her work in New Hampshire politics is funded by out-of-state interests. What hypocrisy.

 Find it here

Bin Laden is dead & Liberals Look Like...Hypocrites--Surprise!

They make it easy, and Bin Laden is no different.  Their hypocrisy emanates from them like the stench of stale sweat. So it is impossible to give them any credit because we all know that the only reason Osama's death was made public late on a Monday night was because someone probably leaked it; this Executive branch does nothing without first plotting out the political ramifications and optimizing the benefits; it's why it often takes them days to respond to any event.

So Osama is dead.  Go team.  But will we stay the course to get the rest of them?  Probably not.  So what better time than now to remind ourselves about the hypocrisy; and we look no further than MoveOn.org (H/T to Ace of Spades) and the democrats who ran adds attacking Republicans for politicizing 9/11 and Bin Laden.

WASHINGTON, Sept. 12 /U.S. Newswire/ -- A new TV ad attacks Republican attempts to use the fifth anniversary of 9/11 to resuscitate the President's popularity and help Republicans hang on to control of Congress.

MoveOn.org Political Action's thirty second spot is planned to begin airing nationwide on cable this week. The ad buy is $100,000.

The ad, "Exploiting 9/11," reminds Americans of the now discredited claims and promises made by the President and Republican leaders in Congress about the connection between 9/11 and Sadaam Hussein; the capture of Osama bin Laden; and making the country safer by invading Iraq

Who want's to put money on the left buying ad time to use Bin Laden and 9/11 to "resuscitate the presidents popularity"--now that president is Obama? Will there be cries of outrage--yes, but only for those of us who dare point out the contradictions.

Next up, Dick "Darth Vader" Cheney and his storm troopers were the object of hate from the left, right up until yesterday when the Stormtroppers did what they have been doing all along--but on Obama's watch. (H/T Powerline- story by Mark Hemingway)

"After 9/11, I haven't written about this yet, but the Central Intelligence Agency was very deeply involved in domestic activities against people they thought to be enemies of the state. Without any legal authority for it. They haven't been called on it yet."

Hersh then went on to describe a second area of extra-legal operations: the Joint Special Operations Command. "It is a special wing of our special operations community that is set up independently," he explained. "They do not report to anybody, except in the Bush-Cheney days, they reported directly to the Cheney office. ... Congress has no oversight of it."

"It's an executive assassination ring essentially, and it's been going on and on and on," Hersh stated. "Under President Bush's authority, they've been going into countries, not talking to the ambassador or the CIA station chief, and finding people on a list and executing them and leaving. That's been going on, in the name of all of us.

No one will ever accuse anyone of being part of Biden's assassination squad (with the possible exception of his driver) unless they are simply killing the language, or his credibility, but it is clear that as 'Obama's assassination squad,' "Cheney's assassination squad" is now a good idea, great for the nation, and Obama should be elevated for his foresight.  (Even if it is just taking credit for not ruining it all by failing to follow up on his own anti-war, anti-Bush rhetoric.)

 

Naturally, the compliant state-media is flipping over backwards to ignore itself and the leadership on the left as they play hypocrat once more, and we are meant to forget or ignore the contradictions.  Sorry.  That's not going to happen.  Will there be outrage?  Yes, but only at folks like us for bringing it up.  Maybe they will call us racists.  Ooh.  I'm scared.

 

So what's the take away?  Nothing new.  What a liberal-progressive (DBA-Democrat) says never means anything.  And their only defense is to hide behind personal attacks.

 

So let the games begin.

 

 

  



cross psoted