Bipolar Domicile Syndrome…For Voting Purposes…

The New Hampshire TEA Party Republican Legislature did a lot more than just eliminate the 800 Million dollar deficit Democrats willingly left behind, while writing a balanced budget, and estimating revenues that came in on target.  They also managed to repair some damage to election law in regard to domicile.

SB318, vetoed by Governor Lynch, was overridden by both the House and Senate  (House Roll Call)(Senate Roll Call) and become law.  And while there are several important corrections to the forms and language that were made the one that strikes me as the most important is this.

Struck…

[A person’s claim of domicile for voting purposes shall not be conclusive of the person’s residence for any other legal purpose.]

“A persons claim to domicile for voting purposes shall not be conclusive of the person’s residence for any other legal purpose.”

This was inserted into the law when Democrats ran the legislature to allow anyone who was in the state to vote here on election day.  And ‘anyone’ could.   They could vote for Presidents, congressman, Senators, state house offices, Executive Council, Governor…and inevitably, or at least potentially (as long as they were on the list), your local offices, local warrant articles, school and town budgets, local spending, whatever their hearts desire and or as directed by the Democrat party of New Hampshire and their fellow travelers in the university system.

An army of available Democrat voting ballot stuffers on tap.

This is what allowed students whose declared legal residence was outside of New Hampshire to vote Democrat in New Hampshire, even though most of them were paying out of state tuition rates, carrying out of state drivers licenses, and not having any intention of staying after college (see NH Brain Drain).

But they were helping the New Hampshire Democrat party steal votes, and tax dollars, from you, by trying to make your vote meaningless.  And New Hampshire Democrats wanted that, defended it, enshrined it in law, and to this day do everything they can to make you believe that this is something other than a game of political chess where they add extra pieces to give them the advantage.

You’ll be happy to know that not one Democrat in either chamber of the NH Legislature voted in favor of making SB318 law.  And they can make all the excuses they like, but you can’t run away from the facts.  New Hampshire democrats legalized ballot stuffing and out of state influence on local elections when they allowed people who lived outside New Hampshire to vote here, simply becasue they felt certain the majority of them would vote for them and their agenda.  And this exactly why they are against voter ID.

Voter ID doesn’t make it harder for legal residents to vote.  There is no proof that it does, has, or ever will.   But what it does do is make it harder for Democrat voting college students to have bi-polar domicile syndrome, when New Hampshire Democrats need to stuff your local ballot box with their out of state influence.

And making it legal does not make it ethical.  Your vote is perhaps your highest form of political speech.  A majority left wing faction legalized the theft of  votes from the legitimate residents, erased them with the votes of people whose home towns are outside New Hampshire, by making unethical behavior legal.

Claiming it was legal does not make it right.  Letting the government define your morality is far from flattering.  And defending the practice does not salvage your character either.  Encouraging voter fraud is immoral and unethical.  And demanding that we continue to permit it to occur should be the equivalent of political suicide.

And on that note,  here is a list of every elected Democrat (and Republican) that voted to continue the practice of allowing out of state residents to influence local elections by claiming Democrat diagnosed bipolar domicile disorder.

Note: No Democrat voted in favor on the final vote for SB 318.  Those missing from this list were excused, absent or did not vote.  Republicans who voted against as well as State Senate Democrats are also listed

Aguiar, James	Democrat	Grafton	6	Nay
Almy, Susan	Democrat	Grafton	11	Nay
Baroody, Benjamin	Democrat	Hillsborough	13	Nay
Berube, Roger	Democrat	Strafford	2	Nay
Bouchard, Candace	Democrat	Merrimack	11	Nay
Browne, Brendon	Democrat	Strafford	4	Nay
Butynski, William	Democrat	Cheshire	4	Nay
Cali-Pitts, Jacqueline	Democrat	Rockingham	16	Nay
Campbell, David	Democrat	Hillsborough	24	Nay
Chase, Cynthia	Democrat	Cheshire	3	Nay
Cloutier, John	Democrat	Sullivan	4	Nay
Cooney, Mary	Democrat	Grafton	7	Nay
Cote, David	Democrat	Hillsborough	23	Nay
Coulombe, Gary	Democrat	Coos	4	Nay
Daler, Jennifer	Democrat	Hillsborough	4	Nay
Deloge, Helen	Democrat	Merrimack	12	Nay
DiPentima, Rich	Democrat	Rockingham	16	Nay
Foose, Robert	Democrat	Merrimack	1	Nay
Frazer, June	Democrat	Merrimack	10	Nay
Gagnon, Raymond	Democrat	Sullivan	4	Nay
Gidge, Kenneth	Democrat	Hillsborough	24	Nay
Gile, Mary	Democrat	Merrimack	10	Nay
Gimas, John	Democrat	Hillsborough	12	Nay
Ginsburg, Philip	Democrat	Strafford	7	Nay
Gorman, Mary	Democrat	Hillsborough	23	Nay
Gould, Franklin	Democrat	Grafton	11	Nay
Grassie, Anne	Democrat	Strafford	1	Nay
Hamm, Christine	Democrat	Merrimack	4	Nay
Harding, Laurie	Democrat	Grafton	11	Nay
Hatch, William	Democrat	Coos	3	Nay
Hawkes, Samuel	Democrat	Cheshire	3	Nay
Hooper, Dorothea	Democrat	Strafford	5	Nay
Horrigan, Timothy	Democrat	Strafford	7	Nay
Jeudy, Jean	Democrat	Hillsborough	10	Nay
Johnsen, Gladys	Democrat	Cheshire	3	Nay
Kaen, Naida	Democrat	Strafford	7	Nay
Keans, Sandra	Democrat	Strafford	1	Nay
Lefebvre, Benjamin	Democrat	Sullivan	1	Nay
Leishman, Peter	Democrat	Hillsborough	3	Nay
Levasseur, Nickolas	Democrat	Hillsborough	11	Nay
Lindsey, Steven	Democrat	Cheshire	3	Nay
Long, Patrick	Democrat	Hillsborough	10	Nay
Lovejoy, Patricia	Democrat	Rockingham	13	Nay
MacKay, James	Democrat	Merrimack	11	Nay
Merrick, Evalyn	Democrat	Coos	2	Nay
Moody, Marcia	Democrat	Rockingham	12	Nay
Nordgren, Sharon	Democrat	Grafton	9	Nay
Norelli, Terie	Democrat	Rockingham	16	Nay
Owen, Derek	Democrat	Merrimack	4	Nay
Pantelakos, Laura	Democrat	Rockingham	16	Nay
Parkhurst, Henry	Democrat	Cheshire	4	Nay
Pastor, Beatriz	Democrat	Grafton	9	Nay
Patten, Dick	Democrat	Merrimack	11	Nay
Pelletier, Marsha	Democrat	Strafford	5	Nay
Perry, Robert	Democrat	Strafford	3	Nay
Pierce, David	Democrat	Grafton	9	Nay
Pilotte, Maurice	Democrat	Hillsborough	16	Nay
Potter, Frances	Democrat	Merrimack	10	Nay
Ramsey, Peter	Democrat	Hillsborough	8	Nay
Read, Robin	Democrat	Rockingham	16	Nay
Rhodes, Brian	Democrat	Hillsborough	22	Nay
Rice, Chip	Democrat	Merrimack	12	Nay
Richardson, Gary	Democrat	Merrimack	4	Nay
Roberts, Jenna	Democrat	Strafford	7	Nay
Rokas, Ted	Democrat	Hillsborough	12	Nay
Rosenwald, Cindy	Democrat	Hillsborough	22	Nay
Sad, Tara	Democrat	Cheshire	2	Nay
Schlachman, Donna	Democrat	Rockingham	13	Nay
Schmidt, Andrew	Democrat	Sullivan	1	Nay
Schmidt, Peter	Democrat	Strafford	4	Nay
Serlin, Christopher	Democrat	Rockingham	16	Nay
Shaw, Barbara	Democrat	Hillsborough	16	Nay
Shurtleff, Stephen	Democrat	Merrimack	10	Nay
Smith, Suzanne	Democrat	Grafton	7	Nay
Spainhower, Dale	Democrat	Strafford	2	Nay
Spang, Judith	Democrat	Strafford	7	Nay
Sprague, Dale	Democrat	Strafford	2	Nay
Sullivan, Daniel	Democrat	Hillsborough	8	Nay
Sullivan, Peter	Democrat	Hillsborough	10	Nay
Tatro, Bruce	Democrat	Cheshire	6	Nay
Taylor, Kathleen	Democrat	Grafton	2	Nay
Theberge, Robert	Democrat	Coos	4	Nay
Thomas, Yvonne	Democrat	Coos	4	Nay
Townsend, Charles	Democrat	Grafton	10	Nay
Wall, Janet	Democrat	Strafford	7	Nay
Wallner, Mary Jane	Democrat	Merrimack	12	Nay
Watrous, Rick	Democrat	Merrimack	12	Nay
Watters, David	Democrat	Strafford	4	Nay
Weber, Lucy	Democrat	Cheshire	2	Nay
Weed, Charles	Democrat	Cheshire	3	Nay
White, Andrew	Democrat	Grafton	11	Nay
Williams, Robert	Democrat	Merrimack	11	Nay

Republicans who also voted no. [All of  'The Usual Suspects']

Brown, Julie	Republican	Strafford	1	Nay
Brown, Paul	Republican	Rockingham	2	Nay
Charron, Gene	Republican	Rockingham	7	Nay
DeSimone, Debra	Republican	Rockingham	6	Nay
Dowling, Patricia	Republican	Rockingham	5	Nay
Drisko, Richard	Republican	Hillsborough	5	Nay
Emerson, Susan	Republican	Cheshire	7	Nay
Hoelzel, Kathleen	Republican	Rockingham	2	Nay
Kidder, David	Republican	Merrimack	1	Nay
Pilliod, James	Republican	Belknap	5	Nay
Robbins, David	Republican	Hillsborough	26	Nay
Russell, David	Republican	Belknap	6	Nay
Seaworth, G. Brian	Republican	Merrimack	7	Nay
Soltani, Tony	Republican	Merrimack	8	Nay
St. Cyr, Jeffrey	Republican	Belknap	5	Nay
Thomas, Joseph	Republican	Hillsborough	19	Nay
Vaillancourt, Steve	Republican	Hillsborough	15	Nay
Waddell, James	Republican	Rockingham	15	Nay

New Hampshire Senate Democrats voting no(All)

D’Allesandro, Lou	Democrat		20	Nay
Houde, Matthew	Democrat		5	Nay
Kelly, Molly	Democrat		10	Nay
Larsen, Sylvia	Democrat		15	Nay
Merrill, Amanda	Democrat		21	Nay

No Republican Senators voted against the veto override.

You are reading "Bipolar domicile syndrome...for voting purposes"  by Steve Mac Donald originally posted at GraniteGrok.com (Home)

Because Democrat Timothy Horrigan Asked…

Calling out Left wing hypocrisy is my meat and potatoes, so the other day, whilst asking (yet again) why anyone would trust Democrats given their party culture, I mentioned (again) that one of their current NH House candidates had previously voted here while claiming to live in another State.

New Hampshire Democrat Timothy Horrigan asked when the candidate, William ‘Hud’ Connery, admitted to living in Tennessee?  Another ‘anonymous commenter’ said the post was bogus and we had no proof.

I accept your challenge.  You want proof, here it is.

UNH Student William Hudson Connery III, announces that he voted in New Hampshire and is a resident of Tennessee.  He also encourages other out of state students to do the same thing.

Operative phrases…

“The Obama campaign is trying to get everyone we can to go down and vote in Durham.”

“If you are from out of state, it doesn’t matter…”

“I am from Tennessee and I voted Already.”

“…You are better off registering now.. (In NH because)…when the general rolls around you wont have to vote absentee in your home town.”

After telling out of state college students not to vote in their “home town” he tells them people died to give them that right.  Actually, no New Hampshire Democrats died to give them the right to vote in a state that does not include their home town.  All they did was use their majority to water down the rules to legalize the stuffing of local ballot boxes with the left leaning votes of out of state college students.

Side note: This guy is running for office with the support and defense of many New Hampshire Democrats.

Some time after voting in New Hampshire, Mr. Connery joins the Tennessee Democrat Party  (wow that picture looks very familiar), listing his town of residence as Nashville, TN, reaffirming the residency he declared while voting in New Hampshire.

Mr. Connery did eventually return to New Hampshire and is running for the NH State House (Rockingham – 17) after reaffirming his domicile in Tennessee in 2009, but in most cases-if the brain-drain arguments are true–these students do not stay nor come back.  They vote here, mostly for Democrats and in support of spending your tax dollars, diluting your ability to object to spending you feel might be excessive or unnecessary, and preventing you from choosing your representatives by significantly tilting the ballot toward the left.

It is worth mentioning that every Democrat running in Newmarket (Michael Cahill, Patty Lovejoy, and Marcia Moody) including Mr. Connery (maybe every Socialist-Democrat in the State?), are against clarifying domicile to prevent improper out of state influence on local elections, and they are also universally against photo ID for the same reasons. The Incumbent Democrats running voted against changes to domicile and requiring photo id (which are now law despite them).  But given the opportunity, they would return us to watered down rules that invalidate legitimate votes with the votes of people who not only vote here when declaring domicile outside the state, but encourage others to do the same as student Connery did.

And claiming it is legal is no excuse. The government can legalize anything it wants–conveniently enough–if it just… has… enough… votes.

Arguing that people who claim to live outside the state should be allowed to vote here–who just happen to overwhelmingly vote for Democrats and watering down voting rules–is not just advocating out of state influence (in contradiction to another thing New Hampshire Democrats insist they are against), it is stuffing the ballot box to give them even more votes in town councils and the state legislature, to legalize other behaviors that could give Democrats more political power over the rest of us.

Making it legal does not change the fundamental issue at hand.   It makes it impossible for actual residents to choose their own candidates or to ensure that warrants, spending, any measure on their local ballot, passed or failed because of the will of the people who truly live there.

Republicans have tried to give that voice back to you, by simply asking people to commit to living here before voting like they do; and to demonstrate some evidence of that commitment before they vote to spend New Hampshire residents money or to select candidates who will have the same power.  And before you say it….those out of state college students have not been denied their right to vote.  No one died in vain to protect that.  They can vote absentee, in their own home town, just like everyone in the military and military families have done for years, when they have volunteered to be someplace else in the world.

New Hampshire Democrats sanctioned the ultimate form of out of state influence on local elections by making it legal for non-residents to cast votes here.  And now they want it back.

And before I forget…did I answer your questions?  Or are the candidates actual own words and actions inadmissible before the Democrat court of opinion?

You are reading "Because Democrat Timothy Horrigan Asked..."  by Steve Mac Donald originally posted at GraniteGrok.com (Home)

Would NH Democrats Want Out Of State Military Personel Voting Here?

It is generally accepted that military personnel and their families,  no matter where they are working, get to vote back home, no matter where they are and how far away “home” is.

But to hear New Hampshire Democrats talk, if there was one or more, great big military bases in New Hampshire, with thousands of military personnel and family members stationed there, that those folks should be voting in New Hampshire, in that town, county, and district, no matter what state they claimed as their home or what was on their drivers license.

That’s how they justify out of state college students voting for Democrats in local College towns.

Fascilitators & Organizers

by Steve MacDonald 

The Foster’s (It’s Australian for Beeyah!) Daily Democrat, gave GraniteGrok some ink this morning regarding James O’Keefe’s “appearance” at a Rye Republican GOP event yesterday…(That’s Rye NH, not the grass or the spirits, though perhaps the humor.)

O’Keefe’s video appearance Sunday was facilitated by the conservative political website Granite Grok, which provided live video coverage of the Rye gala online.

Foster’s (It’s Australian for Beeyah!) also said this…

Between O’Keefe’s comments, the Granite Grok organizers showed brief clips from some of the videos created by O’Keefe and Project Veritas, the group he founded approximately two years earlier to assist his work.

Facilitators and Organizers.  At least they spelled the name right. I could not, unfortunately, be there, but Skip and Mike had things well manged as always.

Here’ a link to the Grok Exclusive video of the O’Keefe appearance which, yes…without the help of GraniteGrok, would not have been possible.

You are reading "Facilitators & Organizers"  by Steve Mac Donald originally posted at GraniteGrok.com.(Home)

NH – Where (More) Vote Fraud Really Has Been Around For Years

Vote Fraud has been prevalent, and hidden from New Hampshire voters, for years.   In fact, I know of a very large binder at a certain office in Concord, filled with evidence of voter fraud.   Evidence like this.

During the 2000 election 19 people claimed residence at #159 Bear Brook Road.  Nineteen people, all living and voting from one address?  Yes, all 19 registered to vote in New Hampshire, all from the same address.  As it turns out, none of them were actual New Hampshire residents.  In fact, there was no #159 Bear Brook road.  There was no #159 Bear Brook Road because there was no Bear Brook road.

The mandatory voter list purge that followed the 2000 elections produced 19 returned voter list letters, with 19 names of registered ‘NH’ voters, all for the same non-existent address, registered to vote in the November 2000 elections. They were all long gone by the time the letters were returned, votes cast and counted eight months before.  No charges were ever brought.  No one was ever tracked down.  Not by the NH AG at least.

Local activists, the real grass roots in NH, have been tracking and cataloging voter fraud for more than a decade.  They’ve done the hard work of compiling, reporting, and exposing these kinds of people when the state and the AG have shown no interest.  Some of those vote stealers have been in touch.  Apparently their names have turned up on Google, attached to accusations of vote fraud, falsifying  addresses on registration documents, that kind of thing.  I guess that can make it hard to get hired in certain professional circles when there are documents with your name on them attached to accusations of vote fraud.  Of course they do not all have to use real names.  They can just borrow them from dead people

And stealing 19 votes in some of these small towns is more than enough to steal a local election.   It is enough in plenty of larger towns and cities as well.  In many cases, one vote is one too many.  So vote fraud matters.

And this story is neither new nor unknown to the people responsible for protecting the integrity of the NH Ballot.  And it has only gotten easier since 2000.  The Democrat party’s record on watering down the process is well know locally.  Thanks to recent events it is about to become well known nationally.

And while dead people are not the only ones who get to vote illegally in New Hampshire, for some reason it is only the Veritas folks–none of who actually stole a vote–who are threatened with any kind of legal action.

Those  19 people from out of state who registered at the same non-existent address- they were never charged.  Here are three examples…

Joseph M. Gallagher - No Such address

Meredith J Benson - No such address

Christine A Kelly - No such address

Voter Fraud and Vote fraud are not a new problem.  But Democrats, and some Republicans, have treated it like the red-headed step child for long enough.  No more hiding behind misleading statements about the integrity of New Hampshire elections.  Your votes and your elections are being stolen from you, and have been at risk for some time.  Voter ID would eliminate most of the easiest ways to steal your vote.

But Democrats have been against voter ID all along.  They have also made it not just easier to register and vote without proving who you are, they have made it increasingly difficult to challenge same day registrants that might prevent illegal votes, and made tracking fraud after it has happened almost impossible.  This explains why they seem so confident in their claim that there is no voter fraud in NH.  When you have made it almost impossible to stop it, or spot it, how can anyone challenge you on it.

But vote fraud exists.  And it took an extreme act of courage to expose it for all to see.  An act that has Democrats and their fellow travelers scrambling for the rhetoric and crying for justice.  Justice they have never bothered to seek despite plenty of previous examples of how vote fraud can and has been committed in the state of New Hampshire.

But we shouldn’t be charging the folks with Project Veritas, we should be thanking them.